Cited by 434Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyChild Development and Digital Technology

Development of Korean Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale for Youth

Open access
Kim, Dongil, Lee, Yunhee, Lee, Juyoung, Nam, JeeEun Karin, Chung, Yeoju·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

This study developed a Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale (SAPS) based on the existing internet and cellular phone addiction scales. For the development of this scale, 29 items (1.5 times the final number of items) were initially selected as preliminary items, based on the previous studies on internet/phone addiction as well as the clinical experience of involved experts. The preliminary scale was administered to a nationally representative sample of 795 students in elementary, middle, and high schools across South Korea. Then, final 15 items were selected according to the reliability test results. The final scale consisted of four subdomains: (1) disturbance of adaptive functions, (2) virtual life orientation, (3) withdrawal, and (4) tolerance. The final scale indicated a high reliability with Cronbach's α of .880. Support for the scale's criterion validity has been demonstrated by its relationship to the internet addiction scale, KS-II (r = .49). For the analysis of construct validity, we tested the Structural Equation Model. The results showed the four-factor structure to be valid (NFI = .943, TLI = .902, CFI = .902, RMSEA = .034). Smartphone addiction is gaining a greater spotlight as possibly a new form of addiction along with internet addiction. The SAPS appears to be a reliable and valid diagnostic scale for screening adolescents who may be at risk of smartphone addiction. Further implications and limitations are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0097920

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PSU shares many traits with substance abuse disorders and behavioural addictions, and it appears to be common.

    “PSU shares many traits with substance abuse disorders and behavioural addictions [13–18], and it appears to be common.”

    From Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: a systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says the smartphone-addiction scale drew on criteria for other behavioural addictions and identifies withdrawal and tolerance among its subdomains. The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that 11.4% of South Korean youths were considered addicted to smartphones, supporting the impression that it is common in that population. Our copy does not explicitly compare problematic smartphone use with substance abuse disorders, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [6]National Information Society Agency (2011) Report on the Development of Korean Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale for Youth and Adults. PMC4029762 24848006
  2. [8]Lee H (2008) Exploration of the Predicting Variables Affecting the Addictive Mobile Phone Use. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology 22(1): 133– 157.
  3. [16]Kim D, Lee C (2010) Technology Trends of Smartphone User Interface. Korea Information Science Society Review 28(5): 15– 26.
  4. [18]Kim M (2011) Study on Online and Offline Relationship of Smart Phone SNS Users: Centering on Twitter. The Graduate School of Ewha Women's University. Master's Thesis.
  5. [19]Noh M, Kim J, Lee J (2010) Analysis of Smartphone and Convergence of Functions through Association Analysis. Journal of the Korea Society of Management Information Systems 1: 254– 259.
  6. [21]Kim J (2010) The Evolution of Mobile Internet Service. OSIA Standards & Technology Review 38(1): 4– 12.
  7. [23]Choi WS (2010) Study on the importance of functional characteristic of smartphones. Journal of Information Technology Application & Management 1: 289– 297.
  8. [34]Shin K, Kim DI, Chung Y (2011) Report: Development of Korean Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale For Youth and Adults. National Information Society Agency. PMC4029762 24848006
  9. [38]Young KS (1996) Addictive use of the internet: a case that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports 79: 899– 902. 8969098
  10. [42]Demetrovics Z, Szereredi B, Rozsa S (2008) The three-factor model of Internet Addiction: The development of the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire. Behavior Research Methods 40(2): 563– 574. 18522068
  11. [48]Kang H, Son C (2009) Development and Validation of the Mobile Phone Addiction Scale for Adolescents. Korean journal of health psychology 14(3): 497– 510.
  12. [50]Keum C (2013) Research into smartphone addiction proneness and mental health problem for middle and high school student at Korea. Seoul National University Master's Thesis.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, D., Lee, Y., Lee, J., Nam, J. K., & Chung, Y.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Yunhee
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-05-21
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e97920
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084863892
Cited by
434
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
67.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
smartphone addiction, scale development, adolescents, internet addiction, addiction screening, withdrawal, tolerance, construct validity, criterion validity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Cell Phone, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review