Cited by 89Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Virtual reality exposure therapy in flight anxiety: a quantitative meta-analysis

Cardoş, Roxana A.I., David, Oana A., David, Daniel O.·2017·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.007

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardoş, R. A. I., David, O. A., & David, D. O.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
72
Pages
371-380
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592077253
Cited by
89
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, fear of flying, aviophobia, phobia treatment, exposure therapy, treatment efficacy, treatment moderators, publication bias, follow-up outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review