Cited by 25Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

New Directions in Virtual Reality-Based Therapy for Anxiety Disorders

David, Daniel, Matu, Silviu-Andrei, David, Oana Alexandra·2013·International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/ijct.2013.6.2.114

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
David, D., Matu, S.-A., & David, O. A.
Affiliations
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Venue
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
Published
2013-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
114-137
ISSN
1937-1209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059193756
Cited by
25
References
97
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
virtual reality therapy, anxiety disorders, mechanisms of change, treatment efficacy, cost reduction, access to treatment, ecological validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review