Cited by 231Media and Digital CommunicationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Explaining the success of social media with gratification niches: Motivations behind daytime, nighttime, and active use of TikTok in China

Open access
Scherr, Sebastian, Wang, Kexin·2021·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106893

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scherr, S., & Wang, K.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Kexin
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
124
Pages
106893
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3168669550
Cited by
230
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 6
FWCI
16.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (19AXW007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
TikTok, uses and gratifications theory, niche theory, motivations for social media use, novelty seeking, trendiness, self-presentation, competitive displacement, age differences, gender differences, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review