Cited by 986Smart Cities and TechnologiesUrban Planning and GovernanceInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Smart city policies: A spatial approach

Angelidou, Margarita·2014·Cities

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Abdoullaev, A. (2011). A smart world: A development model for intelligent cities. In The 11th IEEE international conference on computer and information technology, 31 August–02 September 2011, Pafos, Cyprus.
  2. Bria, F. (2012). New governance models towards an open Internet ecosystem for smart connected European cities and regions. In Open innovation, directorate-general for the information society and media, European commission (pp. 62–71).
  3. Copenhagen cleantech cluster (2012). Danish smart cities: Sustainable living in an urban world. An overview of Danish smart city competencies. In J. Mortensen, F. J. Rohde, K. R. Kristiansen, M. Kanstrup-clausen, & M. Lubanski (Eds.).
  4. GARNER, C., & Dornan, A. (2011). How can knowledge cities become smart? In T. Yigitcanlar & A. C. Fachinelli (Eds.), The 4th knowledge cities world summit, 26–27 October 2011, Bento Gonçalves, Brazil.
  5. Huber, A., & Mayer, I. (2012). Smart cities: An emerging city concept to frame sustainable transitions? In 3rd international conference on sustainability transitions: Sustainable transitions: Navigating theories and challenging realities, 29–31 August, 2012, Copenhagen.
  6. Lee, M., Bakici, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2012). New governance models towards an open Internet ecosystem for smart connected European cities and regions. In Open innovation, directorate-general for the information society and media, European commission (pp. 91–93).
  7. Marciano, C. (2012). Unpacking a smart city model: The revolution of Communication in the urban social space. In 7th international conference on interdisciplinary social sciences, 25–28 June 2012, Barcelona.
  8. Papa, 2013, Towards and urban planners’ perspective on smart city, TeMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 5
  9. Roche, S., Nabian, N., Kloeckl, K., & Ratti, C. (2012). Are ‘Smart Cities’ smart enough? In Global Geospatial Conference 2012, Spatially Enabling Government, Industry and Citizens, 14–17 May 2012, Québec City, Canada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 983

Metadata

Authors
Angelidou, M.
Affiliations
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Angelidou, Margarita
Venue
Cities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
41
Pages
S3-S11
ISSN
0264-2751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965446137
Cited by
986
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 15
FWCI
58.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Keywords
smart cities, smart city policy, urban development strategy, spatial planning, strategic choice, policy recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review