Cited by 248Medication Adherence and ComplianceCognitive Functions and MemoryPharmacy and Medical Practices

The impact of cognitive function on medication management: Three studies.

Open access
Stilley, Carol S., Bender, Catherine M., Dunbar-Jacob, Jacqueline, Sereika, Susan, Ryan, Christopher M.·2010·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Medication nonadherence has been a persistent problem over the past three decades; forgetting and being distracted from regular routines are the barriers most frequently cited by patients. Prior research on cognitive function and medication adherence has yielded mixed results. DESIGN: This report compares findings of three studies: All were longitudinal, two were randomized controlled intervention trials, and one was descriptive. Samples of adult patients taking once daily lipid-lowering medication, diabetic patients with comorbid conditions on complex regimens, and early stage breast cancer patients on hormonal therapy completed similar batteries of standardized, valid, neuropsychological tests at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adherence to medication regimens, over time, was tracked with electronic event monitors. RESULTS: Medication nonadherence was prevalent in all studies. Deficits in attention/mental flexibility and/or working memory predicted nonadherence in all studies; impaired executive function was related to poor adherence in one study. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that better mental efficiency may be the key to better medication adherence with any regimen, and that targeted cognitive functions, which can be easily and quickly assessed, may identify patients at risk of poor adherence regardless of diagnosis or regimen.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016940

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mild cognitive impairment in older adults is associated with poor medication adherence in most studies.

    “Also, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in older adults has been found to be associated with poor medication adherence in most studies.11–13”

    From Effectiveness of eHealth interventions targeted to improve medication adherence among older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Abstract (Results; page unavailable) reports that deficits in attention, mental flexibility, or working memory predicted non-adherence in all three studies. But the Methods describe adult samples, including participants aged 24–60 in Study #1, and do not identify participants as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The Introduction also describes prior research findings as mixed, so this paper does not establish the claim about MCI in older adults across most studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Schutte C Medication adherence in the elderly: The predictive power of neuropsychological tests Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B 2006 67 6-B 3466
  2. Lezak MD Neuropsychological Assessment 1995 Oxford University Press New York 3rd Ed.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stilley, C. S., Bender, C. M., Dunbar-Jacob, J., Sereika, S., & Ryan, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2010
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
50-55
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2006842057
Cited by
248
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
FWCI
16.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health (2 P30 NR003924-15, 5U01HLO 48992-02, R01 DK59048, R01 CA107408-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medication adherence, medication non-adherence, cognitive function, attention, cognitive flexibility, working memory, executive function, lipid-lowering drugs, diabetes mellitus, breast cancer, hormone therapy, neuropsychological assessment, risk identification
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Cognition Disorders, Drug Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Patient Compliance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review