Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep brain stimulation and electromagnetic interference

Open access
Rahimpour, Shervin, Kiyani, Musa, Hodges, Sarah E., Turner, Dennis A.·2021·Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has evolved into an approved and efficacious treatment for movement, obsessive-compulsive, and epilepsy disorders that are refractory to medical therapy, with current investigation into other disease conditions. However, there are unintentional and intentional sources of external electromagnetic interference (EMI) that can lead to either malfunctioning or damaged DBS devices, as well as injury to human tissue. Comprehensive studies and guidelines on such topics in the medical literature are scarce. Herein, we review the principles behind EMI, as well as the various potential sources of interference, both unintentional (e.g. stray EMI fields) and intentional (e.g. MRI scans, "brainjacking"). Additionally, we employ the Manufacturer and User Device Facility Experience (MAUDE) database to assess real-world instances of EMI (e.g., airport body scanners, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electrosurgery) affecting DBS devices commonly implanted in the United States (US).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106577

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kainz, 2003, Electromagnetic interference of GSM mobile phones with the implantable deep brain stimulator, ITREL-III, Biomed. Eng. Online, 2, 11, 10.1186/1475-925x-2-11 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 68

Metadata

Authors
Rahimpour, S., Kiyani, M., Hodges, S. E., & Turner, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rahimpour, Shervin
Venue
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
203
Pages
106577
ISSN
0303-8467 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3131287423
Cited by
63
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (UH3NS103468, UH3NS129898)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, electromagnetic interference, MRI safety, electrosurgery, MAUDE database, movement disorders, epilepsy, obsessive-compulsive disorder
MeSH terms
Electromagnetic Fields, Electronics, Humans, Deep Brain Stimulation, Implantable Neurostimulators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep brain stimulation and electromagnetic interference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106577
The paper
Rahimpour, S., Kiyani, M., Hodges, S. E., & Turner, D. A. (2021). Deep brain stimulation and electromagnetic interference. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106577

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.