Cited by 607Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EuroOOPS: An international, multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome

Abstract

Background & aims The aim of the study was to implement nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002) and to assess the association between nutritional risk and clinical outcome. Methods NRS-2002 was implemented in 26 hospital departments (surgery, internal medicine, oncology, intensive care, gastroenterology and geriatrics) in Austria, the Czech Republic, Egypt, Germany, Hungary, Lebanon, Libya, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and Switzerland. Being a prospective cohort study, randomly selected adult patients were included at admission and followed during their hospitalisation. Data were collected on the nutritional risk screening, complications, mortality, length of stay and discharge. The correlation between risk status and clinical outcome was assessed and adjusted for confounders (age, speciality, diagnoses, comorbidity, surgery, cancer and region) by multivariate regression analysis. Results Of the 5051 study patients, 32.6% were defined as 'at-risk' by NRS-2002. 'At-risk' patients had more complications, higher mortality and longer lengths of stay than 'not at-risk' patients and these variables were significantly related to components of NRS-2002, also when adjusted for confounders. Conclusions Components of NRS-2002 are independent predictors of poor clinical outcome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.03.012

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Edington, 2000, Prevalence of malnutrition on admission to four hospitals in England. The Malnutrition Prevalence Group, Clin Nutr, 19, 191, 10.1054/clnu.1999.0121 · DOI
  2. Correia, 2003, Prevalence of hospital malnutrition in Latin America: the multicenter ELAN study, Nutrition, 19, 823, 10.1016/S0899-9007(03)00168-0 · DOI
  3. Thomas, 2002, Malnutrition in subacute care, Am J Clin Nutr, 75, 308, 10.1093/ajcn/75.2.308 · DOI
  4. Lazarus, 2005, Prevalence and documentation of malnutrition in hospitals: A case study in a large private hospital setting, Nutr Diet, 26, 41, 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2005.tb00008.x · DOI
  5. Naber, 1997, Prevalence of malnutrition in nonsurgical hospitalized patients and its association with disease complications, Am J Clin Nutr, 66, 1232, 10.1093/ajcn/66.5.1232 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kyle, 2005, Does nutritional risk, as assessed by Nutritional Risk Index, increase during hospital stay? A multinational population-based study, Clin Nutr, 24, 516, 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.04.003 · DOI
  7. McWhirter, 1994, Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital, BMJ, 308, 945, 10.1136/bmj.308.6934.945 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gallagher-Allred, 1996, Malnutrition and clinical outcomes: the case for medical nutrition therapy, J Am Diet Assoc, 96, 361, 10.1016/S0002-8223(96)00099-5 · DOI
  9. Beck, 2001, Food and nutritional care in hospitals: how to prevent undernutrition–report and guidelines from the Council of Europe, Clin Nutr, 20, 455, 10.1054/clnu.2001.0494 · DOI
  10. Beck, 2002, Practices in relation to nutritional care and support–report from the Council of Europe, Clin Nutr, 21, 351, 10.1054/clnu.2002.0555 · DOI
  11. Kondrup, 2003, ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002, Clin Nutr, 22, 415, 10.1016/S0261-5614(03)00098-0 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kondrup, 2003, Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials, Clin Nutr, 22, 321, 10.1016/S0261-5614(02)00214-5 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Johansen, 2004, Effect of nutritional support on clinical outcome in patients at nutritional risk, Clin Nutr, 23, 539, 10.1016/j.clnu.2003.10.008 · DOI
  14. Schneider, 2004, Malnutrition is an independent factor associated with nosocomial infections, Br J Nutr, 92, 105, 10.1079/BJN20041152 · DOI
  15. Kondrup, 2002, Incidence of nutritional risk and causes of inadequate nutritional care in hospitals, Clin Nutr, 21, 461, 10.1054/clnu.2002.0585 · DOI
  16. Buzby, 1988, Study protocol: a randomized clinical trial of total parenteral nutrition in malnourished surgical patients, Am J Clin Nutr, 47, 366, 10.1093/ajcn/47.2.366 · DOI
  17. Charlson, 1987, A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation, J Chronic Dis, 40, 373, 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Wolfe, 1995, Length of hospital stay and complications after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: clinical and procedural predictors, Circulation, 92, 311, 10.1161/01.CIR.92.3.311 · DOI
  19. Chen, 2005, Impact of nosocomial infection on cost of illness and length of stay in intensive care units, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 26, 281, 10.1086/502540 · DOI
  20. Suarez, 2004, Length of stay and mortality in neurocritically ill patients: impact of a specialized neurocritical care team, Crit Care Med, 32, 2311, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000146132.29042.4C · DOI
  21. Correia, 2003, The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis, Clin Nutr, 22, 235, 10.1016/S0261-5614(02)00215-7 · DOI
  22. Rasmussen, 2004, Prevalence of patients at nutritional risk in Danish hospitals, Clin Nutr, 23, 1009, 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.01.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 546

Metadata

Authors
Sorensen, J., Kondrup, J., Prokopowicz, J., Schiesser, M., Krähenbühl, L., Meier, R., & Liberda, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • HFR Freiburg Kantonsspital (CH)
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
340-349
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041669990
Cited by
607
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 35
FWCI
21.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
nutritional risk screening, NRS-2002, nutritional risk, clinical outcomes, in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, hospital discharge, predictors of poor outcome, multicenter study
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cohort Studies, Weight Loss, Nutrition Assessment, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality, Risk Assessment, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review