Cited by 108Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

GLP-1 Influences Food and Drug Reward

Open access
Hayes, Matthew R, Schmidt, Heath D·2016·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Natural rewards, including food, water, sleep and social interactions, are required to sustain life. The neural substrates that regulate the reinforcing effects of these behaviors are also the same neurobiological mechanisms mediating mood, motivation and the rewarding effects of pharmacological stimuli. That the neuropeptide glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is under investigation for both the homeostatic and hedonic controls of feeding is not surprising or novel. However, if the neural substrates that underline food reward are shared with other reward-related behaviors generally, then future research should investigate and embrace the likelihood that endogenous and exogenous GLP-1 receptor activation may influence multiple reward-related behaviors. Indeed, studies of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying motivated feeding behavior have informed much of the basic research investigating neural substrates of drug addiction. An emerging literature demonstrates a role for the GLP-1 system in modulating maladaptive reward behaviors, including drug and alcohol consumption. Thus, if GLP-1-based pharmacotherapies are to be used to treat drug addiction and other diseases associated with maladaptive reward behaviors (e.g. obesity and eating disorders), the neuroscience field must conduct systematic, mechanistic neuropharmacological and behavioral studies of each GLP-1 receptor-expressing nucleus within the brain. It is possible that behavioral selectivity may result from these studies, which could inform future approaches to targeting GLP-1R signaling in discrete brain nuclei to treat motivated behaviors. Equally as likely, non-selective effects on natural reward and maladaptive reward behaviors may be observed for GLP-1-based pharmacotherapies. In this case, a better understanding of the effects of increased central GLP-1R activation on motivated behaviors will aid in clinical approaches toward treating aberrant feeding behaviors and/or drug dependence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.005

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of central GLP-1 receptors attenuates dopamine-mediated reward pathways, reducing the incentive salience of food.

    “Activation of central GLP-1 receptors attenuates these dopamine-mediated reward pathways, reducing the incentive salience of food [59].”

    From Adherence and Persistence with GLP-1-Based Therapies: International Real-World Evidence and the Role of Nutritional and Lifestyle Support—A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [59]

    The “Central actions of GLP-1 on food and drug rewards” section (page unavailable) reports that GLP-1 receptor activation in mesolimbic nuclei reduces palatable-food intake and may reduce the motivational incentive of rewarding food. It does not establish attenuation of dopamine-mediated pathways as the mechanism, and it frames the motivational effect as a possibility rather than a settled result. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Hayes MR Mietlicki-Baase EG Kanoski SE De Jonghe BC Incretins and amylin: Neuroendocrine communication between the gut, pancreas, and brain in control of food intake and blood glucose Annu Rev Nutr 2014 34 237 260 24819325 PMC4458367

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, M. R., & Schmidt, H. D.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hayes, Matthew R
  • Schmidt, Heath D
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
9
Pages
66-70
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2261355898
Cited by
108
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01-DA037897, R01-DK096139)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
glucagon-like peptide-1, GLP-1 receptor, food reward, drug reward, drug addiction, natural reward, obesity, eating disorders, brain nuclei, neuropharmacology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review