Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors

Allan Cheyne, J., Solman, Grayden J.F., Carriere, Jonathan S.A., Smilek, Daniel·2009·Cognition
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.009

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Bellgrove, 2006, The cognitive genetics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Sustained attention as a candidate phenotype, Cortex, 42, 838, 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70426-X · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bellgrove, 2005, Dissecting the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) phenotype: Sustained attention, response variability and spatial attentional asymmetries in relation to dopamine transporter (DAT1) genotype, Neuropsychologia, 43, 1847, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.011 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Botvinick, 2001, Conflict monitoring and cognitive control, Psychological Review, 108, 624, 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Burgund, 2003, Sustained and transient activity during an object-naming task: A mixed blocked and event-related fMRI study, NeuroImage, 19, 29, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00061-2 · DOI
  5. Cheyne, 2006, Absent-mindedness: Lapses in conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures, Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 578, 10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.009 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cohen, 2000, Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: Who’s in control?, Nature Neuroscience, 3, 421, 10.1038/74783 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dockree, 2007, Optimal sustained attention is linked to the spectral content of background EEG activity: Greater ongoing tonic alpha (10Hz) power supports successful phasic goal activity, European Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 900, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05324.x · DOI
  8. Dockree, 2005, Neurophysiological markers of alert responding during goal-directed behavior: A high-density electrical mapping study, NeuroImage, 27, 587, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.044 · DOI
  9. Dockree, 2004, Behavioural and physiological impairments of sustained attention after traumatic brain injury, Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 403, 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.019 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Donaldson, 2001, Dissociating state and item components of recognition memory using fMRI, NeuroImage, 13, 129, 10.1006/nimg.2000.0664 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Douse, 1900, On some minor psychological interferences: A study of misspellings and related mistakes, Mind: New Series, 9, 85, 10.1093/mind/IX.36.85 · doi:10.1093/mind/ix.36.85
  12. Farrin, 2003, Effects of depressed mood on objective and subjective measures of attention, Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 15, 98, 10.1176/jnp.15.1.98 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fassbender, 2006, The role of a right fronto-parietal network in cognitive control: Common activations for “cues-to-attend” and response inhibition, Journal of Psychophysiology, 20, 286, 10.1027/0269-8803.20.4.286 · DOI
  14. Garavan, 2006, Individual differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control, Brain Research, 1105, 130, 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.029 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Giambra, 1995, A laboratory method for investigating influences on switching attention to task-unrelated imagery and thought, Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 1, 10.1006/ccog.1995.1001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Gilden, 2007, Response variability in attention deficit disorders, Psychological Science, 18, 796, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01982.x · DOI
  17. Hart, 1998, Awareness of errors in naturalistic action after traumatic brain injury, Journal of Head Trauma, 13, 16, 10.1097/00001199-199810000-00004 · DOI
  18. Hester, 2004, Individual differences in error processing: A review and reanalysis of three event-related fMRI studies using the GO/NOGO task, Cerebral Cortex, 14, 986, 10.1093/cercor/bhh059 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hester, 2005, Neural mechanisms involved in error processing: A comparison of errors made with and without awareness, NeuroImage, 27, 602, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.035 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Johnson, 2007, Response variability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Evidence for neuropsychological heterogeneity, Neuropsychologia, 45, 630, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.034 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Johnson, 2007, Dissociation of performance of children with ADHD and high-functioning autism on a task of sustained attention, Neuropsychologia, 45, 2234, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.019 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kane, 2007, For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life, Psychological Science, 18, 614, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01948.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kaufman, 2003, Cingulate hypoactivity in cocaine users during a GO/NOGO task as revealed by event-related fMRI, Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 7839, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-21-07839.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Klein, 2006, Intra-subject variability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Biological Psychiatry, 60, 1088, 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kvavilashvili, 2004, Out of one’s mind: A study of involuntary semantic memories, Cognitive Psychology, 48, 47, 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00115-4 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Mackworth, 1948, The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Research, 1, 6
  27. Manly, 2001, The differential assessment of children’s attention: The test of everyday attention for children TEA-CH) normative sample and ADHD attention, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 1065, 10.1111/1469-7610.00806 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Manly, 2004, An electronic knot in the handkerchief: ‘Content free cueing’ and the maintenance of attentive control, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14, 89, 10.1080/09602010343000110 · DOI
  29. Manly, 2002, Coffee in the cornflakes: Time-of-day as a modulator of executive response control, Neuropsychologia, 40, 1, 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00086-0 · DOI
  30. Manly, 1999, The absent mind: Further investigations of sustained attention to response, Neuropsychologia, 37, 661, 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00127-4 · DOI · Paper page
  31. McAvinue, 2005, Impaired sustained attention and error awareness in traumatic brain injury: Implications for insight, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 15, 569, 10.1080/09602010443000119 · DOI
  32. Miller, 2001, An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Mitchell, 2007, Separating sustained from transient aspects of cognitive control during thought suppression, Psychological Science, 18, 292, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01891.x · DOI
  34. Mullins, 2005, Variability in time reproduction: Difference in ADHD combined and inattentive subtypes, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 169, 10.1097/00004583-200502000-00009 · DOI
  35. O’Connell, 2004, Reduced electrodermal response to errors predicts poor sustained attention performance in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Neuroreport, 15, 2535, 10.1097/00001756-200411150-00021 · DOI · Paper page
  36. O’Keeffe, 2004, Poor insight in traumatic brain injury mediated by impaired error processing? Evidence from electrodermal activity, Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 101
  37. Rabbitt, 1966, Errors and error correction in choice–response tasks, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264, 10.1037/h0022853 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Reason, 1998, How necessary steps in a task get omitted: Reviving old ideas to combat a persistent problem, International Journal of Cognitive Technology, 3, 24
  39. Reason, 1984, Absent-mindedness in shops: Its incidence, correlates and consequences, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 121, 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1984.tb00635.x · DOI
  40. Robertson, 1997, ‘Oops!:’ Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects, Neuropsychologia, 35, 747, 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Sarason, 1986, Cognitive interference: Situational determinants and trait-like characteristics, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 215, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.215 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.215 · Paper page
  42. Smallwood, 2003, Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information, Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 452, 10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00018-7 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Smallwood, 2004, Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention, Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 657, 10.1016/j.concog.2004.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Smallwood, 2006, Encoding during the attentional lapse: Accuracy of encoding during the semantic SART, Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 218, 10.1016/j.concog.2005.03.003 · DOI
  45. Smallwood, 2008, Segmenting the stream of consciousness: The psychological correlates of temporal structures in the time series data of a continuous performance task, Brain and Cognition, 66, 50, 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.05.004 · DOI
  46. Smallwood, 2007, The lights are on but no one’s home: Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 527, 10.3758/BF03194102 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Smallwood, 2003, Task-unrelated thought: The role of distributed processing, Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 169, 10.1016/S1053-8100(02)00003-X · DOI
  48. Smallwood, 2003, The effects of block duration and task demands on the experience of task unrelated thought, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 22, 13, 10.2190/TBML-N8JN-W5YB-4L9R · DOI
  49. Smallwood, 2004, The consequences of encoding information on the maintenance of internally generated images and thoughts: The role of meaning complexes, Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 789, 10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.004 · DOI
  50. Stemmer, 2004, Error detection in patients with lesions to the medial prefrontal cortex: An ERP study, Neuropsychologia, 42, 118, 10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00121-0 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Teasdale, 1993, Working memory and stimulus independent thought: Effects of memory load and presentation rate, European Journal of Psychology, 5, 417
  52. Velanova, 2003, Functional–anatomic correlates of sustained and transient processing components engaged during controlled retrieval, Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 8460, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-24-08460.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Visscher, 2003, Mixed blocked/event-related designs separate transient and sustained activity in fMRI, NeuroImage, 19, 1694, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00178-2 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Whyte, 2007, Measuring sustained attention after brain injury: Differences in key findings from the sustained attention to response task (SART), Neuropsychologia, 44, 2007, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.012 · DOI

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Allan Cheyne, J., Solman, G. J. F., Carriere, J. S. A., & Smilek, D.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
98-113
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.009
OpenAlex
W1988340313
Cited by
369
References
18
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.009
The paper
Allan Cheyne, J., Solman, G. J. F., Carriere, J. S. A., & Smilek, D. (2009). Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.