The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories
Open accessAbstract
Belief in conspiracy theories has been associated with a range of negative health, civic, and social outcomes, requiring reliable methods of reducing such belief. Thinking dispositions have been highlighted as one possible factor associated with belief in conspiracy theories, but actual relationships have only been infrequently studied. In Study 1, we examined associations between belief in conspiracy theories and a range of measures of thinking dispositions in a British sample (N=990). Results indicated that a stronger belief in conspiracy theories was significantly associated with lower analytic thinking and open-mindedness and greater intuitive thinking. In Studies 2-4, we examined the causational role played by analytic thinking in relation to conspiracist ideation. In Study 2 (N=112), we showed that a verbal fluency task that elicited analytic thinking reduced belief in conspiracy theories. In Study 3 (N=189), we found that an alternative method of eliciting analytic thinking, which related to cognitive disfluency, was effective at reducing conspiracist ideation in a student sample. In Study 4, we replicated the results of Study 3 among a general population sample (N=140) in relation to generic conspiracist ideation and belief in conspiracy theories about the July 7, 2005, bombings in London. Our results highlight the potential utility of supporting attempts to promote analytic thinking as a means of countering the widespread acceptance of conspiracy theories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Conspiracy belief is correlated with lower levels of analytic thinking (Swami, Voracek, Stieger, Tran, & Furnham, 2014)”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Swami, Voracek, Stieger, Tran, & Furnham, 2014
In the citing paper
“Recent research has linked individual differences in analytic thinking with skepticism about various epistemically suspect information, such as fake news (Pennycook & Rand, 2019;2020), religious and paranormal beliefs (Pennycook et al., 2016;Shenhav et al., 2012), conspiracy theories (Swami et al., 2014), and pseudo-profound bullshit (Pennycook et al., 2015;Pennycook & Rand, 2020).”
From The detection of political deepfakes (2022) · cites this paper as Swami et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“This result extends prior research that associated analytic thinking with higher scrutiny towards other post-truth phenomena, such as fake news (Pennycook & Rand, 2019, 2020) and conspiracy theories (Swami et al., 2014).”
From The detection of political deepfakes (2022) · cites this paper as Swami et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291 · Cited by 4,263
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 · Cited by 2,517 · cited 2×
“Need for cognition was mea sured using the 18 item Need for Cognition Scale (NCogS; Cacioppo et al., 1996).”
Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles.
Epstein, S. J., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390 · Cited by 1,928
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 724
Kazun, A., & Porshnev, A. (2021) · Monitoring obŝestvennogo mneniâ: èkonomičeskie i socialʹnye peremeny · doi:10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.1889 · Cited by 12
Ali, A., & Qazi, I. A. (2022) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-101 · Cited by 13
“…beliefs (Pennycook et al., 2012), lower susceptibility to bias in deductive reasoning (Toplak et al., 2011), greater rejection of conspiracy claims (Swami et al., 2014), lower perceived accuracy of fake news (Pennycook & Rand, 2019a), lower likelihood of sharing misinformation on social media…”
BackgroundFluency and the Perceived Ethicality of Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility
Grolleau, G., Mzoughi, N., & Wright, S. A. (2022) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21787 · Cited by 14
Bordeleau, J. (2023) · International Political Science Abstracts · doi:10.1177/00208345231157664 · Cited by 12
“Low cognitive skills have also been attributed to higher conspiracy beliefs, with analytical thinking and deliberation exercises reducing individual adherence to conspiratorial explanations (Swami et al., 2014; Bago et al., 2022; van Prooijen, 2017).”
Wu, Y., Kuru, O., Baruh, L., Çarkoğlu, A., Cemalcılar, Z., & Yıldırım, K. (2023) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2023.2181678 · Cited by 11
“For instance, educators may foster students’ analytical thinking ability, which prompts deliberate information processing to attenuate the influence of conspiratorial worldview (Swami et al., 2014).”
BackgroundThe Sociocognitive Origins of Personal Mastery
Brett, G., & Dubash, S. (2023) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/00221465231167558 · Cited by 15
“Second, given that cognitive styles predict not only mastery but also moral values and religious, romantic, paranormal, and conspiracy beliefs (see Pennycook et al. 2012, 2014; Swami et al. 2014; Trémolière and Djeriouat 2019), this suggests that they may be an important cognitive mechanism for cultural acquisition (C…”
BackgroundGkinopoulos, T., Pagliaro, S., Pacilli, M. G., Bilewicz, M., Teresi, M., & Ballone, C. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.3002 · Cited by 14
Küçükaydın, M. A., & Ayaz, E. (2024) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-024-10482-2 · Cited by 12
“There was no evidence of a relationship between SRC and analytical thinking in the previous literature, although the literature indicates that belief in conspiracy theories affects analytical thinking, which, in turn, has the potential to affect SRC (Gjoneska, 2021; Swami et al., 2014).”
InfluentialCombler le fossé. L’avenir des recherches sur les théories du complot
Bütter, M., Knight, P., & Albert, N. G. (2016) · Diogène · doi:10.3917/dio.249.0021 · Cited by 12
Armstrong, T., Rockloff, M., Browne, M., & Blaszczynski, A. P. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.2020.00049 · Cited by 13
Tomljenović, H., Bubić, A., & Hren, D. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01110-7 · Cited by 14
Exploring vaccine hesitancy: the twofold role of critical thinking
Cannito, L., Ceccato, I., Bortolotti, A., Crosta, A. D., Malva, P. L., Palumbo, R., Domenico, A. D., & Palumbo, R. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-04165-w · Cited by 12
“For instance, analytic thinking is associated with reduced beliefs in conspiracy theories and, in line with that, experimentally eliciting analytic thinking produces a reduction in conspiracies ideation (Swami et al., 2014).”
BackgroundResultZwar, L., König, H., & Hajek, A. (2022) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-022-03177-0 · Cited by 10
The myth of regaining control: Ostracism increases superstitious tendencies
Poon, K., Wong, N. H., Lai, H., & Jiang, Y. (2022) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12606 · Cited by 12
Conceptual Approaches to the Study of Spatial Inequality: the Case of Russian Education
Adamovich, K. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-147-161 · Cited by 10
Conspiracy Beliefs and Consumption: The Role of Scientific Literacy
Allred, N., & Bolton, L. E. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucae024 · Cited by 11
Analytic adolescents prevail over fake news – A large-scale preregistered study
Faragó, L., Orosz, G., Paskuj, B., & Krekó, P. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112747 · Cited by 17
Engaging with Conspiracy Believers
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Biddlestone, M., Green, R., & Toribio‐Flórez, D. (2024) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-024-00741-0 · Cited by 14
Bessarabova, E., Banas, J. A., Reinikainen, H., Talbert, N., Luoma‐aho, V., & Tsetsura, K. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1416722 · Cited by 14
Cicco, G. D., Molinario, E., Contu, F., Pierro, A., Douglas, K. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07710-5 · Cited by 12
Pennycook, G., Binnendyk, J., & Rand, D. G. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672251338358 · Cited by 17
“…with this account, people who believe false conspiracies tend to lack analytic thinking skills (Bayrak et al., 2025; Binnendyk & Pennycook, 2022; Swami et al., 2014), and people may come to conspiracies through intuitive biases such as hypersensitive agency detection (Douglas et al., 2016) or…”
Oliver, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04612-3 · Cited by 16
Scandurra, C., Pizzo, R., Pinto, L. E., Cafasso, C., Pellegrini, R., Cafaggi, F., D’Anna, O., Muzii, B., Bochicchio, V., & Maldonato, M. N. (2022) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe12100109 · Cited by 16
“Nevertheless, anxiety appears to be associated with heightened threat awareness and a greater propensity to interpret ambiguous information and circumstances in a threatening manner [66], which in turn promotes belief in conspiracy theories [67].”
BackgroundRudloff, J. P., Hutmacher, F., & Appel, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31079-9 · Cited by 13
Buchmayr, F. (2019) · Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie · doi:10.1007/s11614-019-00385-w · Cited by 11
Petelinšek, A., & Korajlija, A. L. (2020) · Health Psychology Research · doi:10.4081/hpr.2020.8853 · Cited by 11
Students’ Views on the Covid-19 pandemic: Attitudes, Representations, and Coping Mechanisms
Assante, G. M., & Candel, O. S. (2020) · Postmodern Openings · doi:10.18662/po/11.4/240 · Cited by 12
Analytic Thinking and Political Orientation in the Corona Crisis
Maglić, M., Pavlovic, T. M., & Franc, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631800 · Cited by 10
“…cognitive factors in explaining conspiracy beliefs in general, with different indicators of cognitive proficiency being generally associated with reduced conspiratorial ideation (Oliver and Wood, 2014a,b; Swami et al., 2014, 2017; Stanovich et al., 2016; Van Prooijen, 2017; Georgiou et al., 2019).”
BackgroundRepetition could increase the perceived truth of conspiracy theoriesPreprint
Béna, J., Rihet, M., Carreras, O., & Terrier, P. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3gc6k · Cited by 11
Reuter, C., Hughes, A., & Buntain, C. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2442486 · Cited by 10
“…attainment (Guess, Nagler, and Tucker 2019; Scherer et al. 2021), patterns of media consumption (Jamieson and Albarracin 2020), cognitive traits (Pennycook and Rand 2019; Swami et al. 2014), and others–a more thorough review of this literature is available in Nan, Wang, and Thier (2022).”
Grinschgl, S., Ninaus, M., Wood, G. M. D. O., & Neubauer, A. C. (2025) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2025.05.002 · Cited by 12
Anti-vaccination attitudes are associated with less analytical and more intuitive reasoning
Caravaggio, F., Porco, N., Kim, J., Fervaha, G., Graff‐Guerrero, A., & Gerretsen, P. (2021) · Psychology Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2021.2014911 · Cited by 10
“…persons who demonstrate less analytical and more intuitive reasoning are more likely to, i) endorse conspiracy theories (Ballová Mikušková, 2018; Swami et al., 2014), ii) support ‘complementary and alternative’ medicine (Browne et al., 2015; Lindeman, 2011), iii) have religious and paranormal…”
BackgroundPersily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.002 · Cited by 11
The Role of Political Ideology and Open-Minded Thinking Style in the (in)Accuracy of Factual Beliefs
Kossowska, M., Szwed, P., & Czarnek, G. (2022) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-022-09789-z · Cited by 10
Brito‐Costa, S., Jonason, P. K., Tosi, M., Antunes, R., Silva, S., & Castro, F. V. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268193 · Cited by 10
“Simultaneously, however, women were more likely to be religious [34] which may disable their tendencies to take appropriate and effective acts to minimize risk with beliefs that prayer might be the best option and distrust of scientists [13, 14].”
BackgroundCognitive reflection and endorsement of the “great replacement” conspiracy theory
Jedinger, A., Masch, L., & Burger, A. M. (2023) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.10825 · Cited by 12
“The results of this study are compatible with a causality hypothesis according to which intuitive thinking facilitates epistemically unsubstantiated beliefs, such as endors ing conspiracy theories (Bensley et al., 2022; Binnendyk & Pennycook, 2022; Swami et al., 2014).”
BackgroundResultTrémolière, B., & Djeriouat, H. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.025 · Cited by 12
Gollwitzer, A., & Oettingen, G. (2019) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000368 · Cited by 10
Linguistic drivers of misinformation diffusion on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic
Domenico, G. D., Tuan, A., & Visentin, M. (2021) · Italian Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1007/s43039-021-00026-9 · Cited by 10
Martini, S., Guidi, M., Olmastroni, F., Basile, L., Borri, R., & Isernia, P. (2021) · Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica · doi:10.1017/ipo.2021.26 · Cited by 11
“Finally, a conspiracy mindset has been found to correlate with intuitive thinking – automatic and characterized by affective reactions – rather than analytic reasoning – neutral and based on close examination (Swami et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMeuer, M., Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2021) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.587 · Cited by 9
The Societal Impacts of Covid-19: A Transnational Perspective
Bozkurt, V., Dawes, G. D., Gülerce, H., & Westenbroek, P. (2021) · Istanbul University Press eBooks · doi:10.26650/b/ss49.2021.006 · Cited by 19
Bonafé-Pontes, A., Couto, C., Kakinohana, R. K., Travain, M., Schimidt, L., & Rodrigues, R. P. (2021) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 10
(2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ar96c · Cited by 12
You believe what?!: Relational closeness and belief relevance predict conspiracy belief tolerance
Okdie, B. M., Rempala, D. M., & Mustric, S. R. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03891-5 · Cited by 9
Staszak, S., Maciejowska, J., Urjasz, W., Misiuro, T., & Cudo, A. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192214789 · Cited by 9
“Some research showed that conspiracy thinking may be negatively correlated with the level of analytical thinking and with education [23,26].”
BackgroundDorling, D., & Gietel‐Basten, S. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-36-64 · Cited by 8
Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination
Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M., Hietanen, M., & Baron, J. (2023) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-023-09620-x · Cited by 9
“In the present data, as in previous studies (Baron et al. 2015; Janssen et al. 2019; Swami et al. 2014), NFC overlapped with both AOT and CRT, while CRT and AOT were largely independent of each other, supporting the notion of two related, but partly dissociable aspects of analytic thinking…”
Conspiracy Theories and their Believers
Stockemer, D., & Bordeleau, J. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009570794 · Cited by 10
Political ideology shapes risk and benefit judgments of COVID‐19 vaccines
Rubaltelli, E., Dickert, S., Markowitz, D. M., & Slovic, P. (2023) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14150 · Cited by 9
Corbelli, G., Cicirelli, P. G., D’Errico, F., & Paciello, M. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12090470 · Cited by 12
Poier, S., & Suchanek, M. (2024) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-024-02210-5 · Cited by 12
“Swami et al. (2014b) add to this definition, “… a subset of false beliefs in which the ultimate cause of an event is believed to be due to a plot by multiple actors working together with a clear goal in mind, often unlawfully and in secret” (Swami et al. 2014a).”
Teorias da conspiração: significados em contexto brasileiro
Rezende, A. T., da Silva, F. M. D. S. M., Ribeiro, M. G. C., Loureto, G. D. L., Neta, O. F. D. S., & Gouveia, V. V. (2019) · Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) · doi:10.1590/1982-0275201936e180010 · Cited by 12
Khokhlova, O., Lamba, N., Bhatia, A., & Виноградова, М. Г. (2021) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-021-00282-4 · Cited by 9
McCaffery, K. J., Ayre, J., Dodd, R. H., Pickles, K. M., Copp, T., Muscat, D. M., Nickel, B., Cvejic, E., Zhang, M., Mac, O. A., et al. (2023) · Information Services & Use · doi:10.3233/isu-230185 · Cited by 11
Psychologia myślenia spiskowego
Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2016) · Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego eBooks · doi:10.31338/uw.9788323522157 · Cited by 5
Misinformation about COVID-19: Psychological Insights
Anastasiades, E., Argyrides, M., & Mousoulidou, M. (2021) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia1040091 · Cited by 10
“Indeed, analytic reasoning, besides being associated with a higher tendency to reject misinformation [89], is also associated with sharing behavior that is based on more accurate judgments of information veracity [97], and the sharing of more reliable information [101].”
Of Precarity and Conspiracy: Introducing A Socio-Functional Model of Conspiracy BeliefsPreprint
Adam‐Troian, J., Chayinska, M., Paladino, M. P., Uluğ, Ö. M., Vaes, J., & Wagner‐Egger, P. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mnfrd · Cited by 9
Intuition, reason, and conspiracy beliefsPreprint
Binnendyk, J., & Pennycook, G. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/su3nq · Cited by 9
«3D-модель» российской экономики
Chepurenko, A. Y. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-118-128 · Cited by 8
Lee, J., Kang, D.-Y., Lee, H. Y., & Kim, J. W. (2023) · Health Education Journal · doi:10.1177/00178969231210215 · Cited by 11
“Previous research has found that conspiracy thinking is associated with heuristic processing or an irrational thinking style (Swami et al., 2014; Tomljenovic et al., 2020), which can result in detrimental consequences such as rejecting scientific consensus (Douglas et al., 2019) or distrust in…”
BackgroundRole of Conspiracy Mentality and Paranormal Beliefs in Predicting Conspiracy Beliefs Among Neopagans
Dyrendal, A., Kennair, L. E. O., & Lewis, J. (2018) · International Journal for the Study of New Religions · doi:10.1558/ijsnr.36716 · Cited by 8
Appel, M., & Mehretab, S. (2019) · Die Psychologie des Postfaktischen: Über Fake News, „Lügenpresse“, Clickbait & Co. · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58695-2_11 · Cited by 10
The Effect of Brooding About Societal Problems on Conspiracy Beliefs: A Registered Report
Liekefett, L., Sebben, S., & Becker, J. C. (2024) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.92995 · Cited by 9
Lin, X., Yan, L., & Xu, J. B. (2024) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2024.2323163 · Cited by 8
“As age increases, individuals are supposed to have accumulated more analytic thinking abilities (Swami et al., 2014).”
The Status Foundations of Conspiracy Beliefs
Roscigno, S. (2024) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231241237654 · Cited by 8
“The first is cognitive in nature and surrounds critical, rational, or complex thinking skills (Lantian et al. 2021; Swami et al. 2014; van Prooijen 2017).”
Byington, B. (2019) · Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism · doi:10.26613/jca/2.1.19 · Cited by 9
Zelič, Ž., Berič, M., & Grum, D. K. (2022) · Studia Psychologica · doi:10.31577/sp.2022.01.844 · Cited by 10
COVID-19 Related Stresses, Conspiracy Beliefs, Uncertainty, and Non-adherence to Safety Guidelines
Barahmand, U., Mohamadpour, S., & Ahmad, R. H. S. (2022) · International Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.21500/20112084.5367 · Cited by 6
“A conspiracy theory (CT) is an unsubstantiated false belief that an event has been caused by a plot developed by a group of people, organizations or countries collaborating toward a specific secret goal (Swami et al., 2014) to deceive people or to keep them in control (Stieger et al., 2013).”
BackgroundTella, R. D., & Rotemberg, J. (2016) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w22975 · Cited by 10
Adam-Troian, J., Wagner-Egger, P., Motyl, M., Arciszewski, T., Imhoff, R., Zimmer, F., Klein, O., Babińska, M., Bangerter, A., Bilewicz, M., et al. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nzg7x · Cited by 75
“Other lines of investigation show that CTs adherence is lower among individuals with high analytical reasoning and high moral orientation towards epistemic rationality (Swami et al., 2014; Stahl & Van Prooijen, 2018).”
Democracy and belief in conspiracy theories in New ZealandPreprint
Marques, M. D., Hill, S., Clarke, E. J. R., Williams, M. N., Ling, M., Kerr, J. R., Douglas, K. M., Cichocka, A. K., & Sibley, C. G. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/s8qf4 · Cited by 8
Pärnamets, P., Alfano, M., Bavel, J. J. V., & Ross, R. M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2ujra · Cited by 9
Celia, G., Lausi, G., Girelli, L., Cavicchiolo, E., Limone, P., Giannini, A. M., & Cozzolino, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939615 · Cited by 7
Ozimek, P., Nettersheim, M., Rohmann, E., & Bierhoff, H. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12110435 · Cited by 6
“According to Swami and colleagues [3], this leads to a preference for quick and easy explanations for uncertainties.”
BackgroundResultYoung, D., Molokach, B., & Oittinen, E. (2023) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101776 · Cited by 4
Conspiracy Theory Belief: A Sane Response to an Insane World?
Pierre, J. M. (2023) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-023-00716-7 · Cited by 8
“They don't want you to know the truth”: Evaluating predictors of beliefs in conspiracy theories
dos Reis, M. I. C. S., Rabelo, A., Pilati, R., Franco, V. R., de Almeida, M. D., Iturri-Angulo, N., & Rebouças, T. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4161 · Cited by 6
Adamus, M., Chayinska, M., Šrol, J., Adam‐Troian, J., Mikušková, E. B., & Teličák, P. (2025) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70003 · Cited by 8
“Cognitive abilities, in turn, including analytic and scientific thinking, are among the protective factors insulating against the endorsement of CBs (Erlich et al., 2023; Swami et al., 2014).”
Reflection predicts and leads to decreased conspiracy belief
Bayrak, F., Sümer, V., Doğruyol, B., Sarıbay, S. A., Alper, S., İşler, O., & Yılmaz, O. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106085 · Cited by 9
Reveling in Mayhem: The Need for Chaos in Pandemic Psychology
Alam, R., & Vitriol, J. A. (2025) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12661 · Cited by 7
Mason, J. (2019) · Narrative Inquiry · doi:10.1075/ni.19023.mas · Cited by 6
“Swami, Voracek, Stieger, Tran and Furnham also found correlations between conspiracy belief and reduced levels of analytical thinking (Swami et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSituational Factors Influencing Receptivity to Bullshit
Brown, M., Keefer, L. A., & McGrew, S. J. (2019) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.v14i3.37393 · Cited by 8
“…thinking ulti‐ mately heightens individuals’ endorsement of scientific findings over other beliefs (e.g., endorsing evolution over creationism; Gervais, 2015) and reduces beliefs in conspiracy theories, an established correlate of bullshit receptivity (Hart & Graether, 2018; Swami et al., 2014).”
BackgroundCritical Thinking and the Rejection of Unsubstantiated Claims
Bensley, D. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108684354.005 · Cited by 9
Adiwena, B. Y., Satyajati, M. W., & Hapsari, W. (2020) · Buletin Psikologi · doi:10.22146/buletinpsikologi.60212 · Cited by 7
“In conditions of stress, anxiety, and fear, a person tends to be unable to think logically and analytically, thereby increasing the likelihood of believing in conspiracy theories (Swami et al., 2014; Swami et al., 2016).”
BackgroundGoing beyond simplicity: Using machine learning to predict belief in conspiracy theories
Brandenstein, N. (2022) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2859 · Cited by 9
What is wrong with conspiracy beliefs?
Alper, S., & Yılmaz, O. (2023) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17926.1 · Cited by 7
Die COVID-19-Verschwörung in Theorie und Praxis
Förstl, H. (2020) · DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1055/a-1216-6974 · Cited by 7
“[20] Swami V, Voracek M, Stieger S et al.”
BackgroundANXIETY, ILLUSORY PATTERN PERCEPTION AND CONSPIRACY BELIEFS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Spasovski, O., Démuthová, S., & Kuzmanović, V. (2021) · Teorija in praksa · doi:10.51936/tip.58.3.1333-1149 · Cited by 5
“The findings of some studies show that analytical and critical thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories (Swami et al., 2014), thus enabling students to distinguish scientific arguments from fake information.”
BackgroundReligious Conspiracy Theories About the COVID-19 Pandemic Are Associated With Negative Mental Health
Košárková, A., Maliňáková, K., Novák, L., van Dijk, J. P., & Tavel, P. (2022) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.3389/ijph.2022.1604324 · Cited by 7
“It was also found that beliefs in conspiracy theories may be linked to negative health and adverse social effects [10, 12].”
Background(2017) · OECD economic surveys. Austria · doi:10.1787/eco_surveys-aut-2017-graph59-en · Cited by 9
Tomas, F., Nera, K., & Schöpfer, C. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/qgtzb · Cited by 7
Mohamed, T. N., & Bendania, A. (2023) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-023-01851-7 · Cited by 7
“Therefore, active open-minded thinking is a strong predictor of performance on heuristics and biased exercises, as well as avoiding reasoning traps such as belief in superstitions and conspiracy theories (Swami et al., 2014).”
Conspiracy theories and the epistemic power of narratives
Munro, D. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2381538 · Cited by 7
“5 Empirical evidence suggests that people tend to believe conspiracy theories and other forms of misinformation as a result of intuitive judgments of truth, rather than based on more analytical or reflective thinking (Binnendyk & Pennycook, 2022; Pennycook & Rand, 2019; Swami et al., 2014).”
Imhoff, R., & Bertlich, T. (2024) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-168 · Cited by 6
“Research has provided support for the notion that conspiracy endorsement results from less analytical thinking (Swami et al., 2014, but see Većkalov et al., 2024 for failed replications) and that conspiracy theories are particularly endorsed by people low in cognitive reflection, analytic or…”
Conspiracy Theories and Religious Worldviews: Unraveling a Complex Relationship
Hesse, J., & Weidemann, C. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.55 · Cited by 6
“The overemphasis of holistic over analytic thinking is according to some studies positively correlated with conspiratorial thinking (see, e.g., Swami et al. 2014) and religious beliefs (see, e.g., Pennycook et al. 2012).”
Jedinger, A., & Masch, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2024.1447313 · Cited by 6
Pro‐Science Beliefs: The Role of Analytic Thinking and Epistemic Values
Yilmaz, S., & Ståhl, T. (2025) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.13114 · Cited by 6
“Importantly, analytic thinking has been found to be associated with disbelief in a variety of epistemically suspect beliefs, such as conspiracy theories (Swami et al. 2014) and paranormal beliefs (Pennycook et al. 2012).”
Biddlestone, M., Ziemer, C.-T., Maertens, R., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104818 · Cited by 8
Conspiracy beliefs in the context of a comprehensive rationality assessment
Stanovich, K., & Toplak, M. E. (2024) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2024.2368026 · Cited by 6
“…thinking in our battery of best predictors, the 29.0% variance explained is higher than most other attempts to explain conspir-acy belief that does not include conspiracy mentality itself as a predictor (e.g., Barron et al., 2014; Šrol, 2022; Ståhl & van Prooijen, 2018; Swami et al., 2014).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Westminster (GB)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Swami, Viren
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 572-585
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965444852
- Cited by
- 726
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15
- FWCI
- 55.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nbn-resolving.de
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) (acceptedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, analytical thinking, conspiracist ideation, intuitive thinking, open-mindedness, verbal fluency
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Culture, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Thinking, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review