Cited by 52Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsPlace Attachment and Urban Studies

Familiarity expands space and contracts time

Open access
Jafarpour, Anna, Spiers, Hugo·2017·Hippocampus

Abstract

When humans draw maps, or make judgments about travel-time, their responses are rarely accurate and are often systematically distorted. Distortion effects on estimating time to arrival and the scale of sketch-maps reveal the nature of mental representation of time and space. Inspired by data from rodent entorhinal grid cells, we predicted that familiarity to an environment would distort representations of the space by expanding the size of it. We also hypothesized that travel-time estimation would be distorted in the same direction as space-size, if time and space rely on the same cognitive map. We asked international students, who had lived at a college in London for 9 months, to sketch a south-up map of their college district, estimate travel-time to destinations within the area, and mark their everyday walking routes. We found that while estimates for sketched space were expanded with familiarity, estimates of the time to travel through the space were contracted with familiarity. Thus, we found dissociable responses to familiarity in representations of time and space. © 2016 The Authors Hippocampus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.22672

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Familiar locations are drawn larger on maps than are unfamiliar locations.

    “and familiar locations are drawn larger on maps than are unfamiliar locations 141 (Box 1).”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [141]

  • Familiar places are drawn larger than unfamiliar places.

    “This value attribution may be reflected in the finding that familiar places are drawn larger than unfamiliar places 141 , as well-known places are most likely to be valued or to contain reward.”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [141]

  • Recent evidence indicates that turns in a path and familiarity with an environment can impact representations of distance.

    “Recent evidence indicates that turns in a path and the familiarity with an environment can also impact on representations of distance (Bonasia et al. 2016; Jafarpour and Spiers 2016; Brunec et al. 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jafarpour, A., & Spiers, H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jafarpour, Anna
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-02
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
12-16
ISSN
1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2539119223
Cited by
52
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (094850/Z/10/Z)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Keywords
spatial familiarity, travel time estimation, cognitive maps, mental representation of space, mental representation of time, sketch maps, grid cells, spatial scaling, international students
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Space Perception, Time Perception, Recognition, Psychology, Spatial Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review