Cited by 728

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community

Liu, I-Fan, Chen, Meng Chang, Sun, Yeali S., Wible, David, Kuo, Chin-Hwa·2010·Computers & Education

DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315749105 · Cited by 6,604
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9781410610904 · Cited by 6,235
Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x · Cited by 3,802
Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007 · Cited by 1,184
Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics
Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003 · Cited by 1,132

Show all 11 references

Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12864 · Cited by 1,204
Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for E-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors
Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036 · Cited by 986
Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios
Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 · Cited by 693
Exploring Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning Through the Development of a Comprehensive Technology Acceptance Model
Salloum, S. A., Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, A., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2939467 · Cited by 651
Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025 · Cited by 496
Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: a structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635 · Cited by 445
Measuring Students’ Use of Zoom Application in Language Course Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1 · Cited by 438
Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005 · Cited by 388
A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use
Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-M., Huang, S.-H., & Lin, Y.-T. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.008 · Cited by 293
Students' adoption of AI-based teacher-bots (T-bots) for learning in higher education
Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., Metri, B., & Kaushik, N. (2024) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-02-2021-0152 · Cited by 176
Examining EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and the adoption of mobile-assisted language learning: A partial least square approach
Hsu, L. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1278024 · Cited by 164
Ethical Perceptions of AI in Hiring and Organizational Trust: The Role of Performance Expectancy and Social Influence
Figueroa-Armijos, M., Clark, B. B., & da Motta Veiga, S. P. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05166-2 · Cited by 164
An Investigation of Students’ Acceptance of Moodle in a Blended Learning Setting Using Technology Acceptance Model
Yeou, M. (2016) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239515618464 · Cited by 141
What drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model
Zheng, J., & Li, S. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101612 · Cited by 132
The Integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Value-Based Adoption Model to Study the Adoption of E-Learning: The Moderating Role of e-WOM
Liao, Y.-K., Wu, W.-Y., Le, T. Q., & Phung, T. T. T. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14020815 · Cited by 123
Applying the technology acceptance model in a study of the factors affecting usage of the Taiwan digital archives system
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Hsu, H.-F., Wong, W.-T., & Chen, M.-Y. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.011 · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Research on designers’ behavioral intention toward Artificial Intelligence-Aided Design: integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Technology Acceptance Model
Jiao, J., & Cao, X. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450717 · Cited by 37
The impact of digital literacy and social presence on teachers’ acceptance of online professional development
Mailizar, M., Umam, K., & Elisa, E. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/12329 · Cited by 25
Investigating computer science students’ intentions towards the use of an online educational platform using an extended technology acceptance model (e-TAM): An empirical study at a public university in Tunisia
Adouani, Y., & Khenissi, M. A. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12437-6 · Cited by 11

Authors: Liu, I.-F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C.-H.
Venue: Computers & Education
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2010-02
Volume: 54
Issue: 2
Pages: 600-610
ISSN: 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009
OpenAlex: W2142341968
Cited by: 728
References: 11
FWCI: 44.01
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.

Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Record

About these checks

Data sources