Cited by 401Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEarly Childhood Education and Development

Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children's Reading Comprehension.

Glenberg, Arthur M., Gutierrez, Tiana, Levin, Joel R., Japuntich, Sandra, Kaschak, Michael P.·2004·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

The Indexical Hypothesis suggests a new method for enhancing children’s reading comprehension. Young readers may not consistently “index, ” or map, words to the objects the words represent. Consequently, these readers fail to derive much meaning from the text. The instructional method involves manipulating toy objects referred to in the text (e.g., a barn, a tractor, a horse, in a text about a farm) to simulate the actions described in the text. Correctly manipulating the objects forces indexing and facilitates the derivation of meaning. Both actual manipulation and imagined manipulation resulted in markedly better (compared with rereading) memory for and comprehension of the text material, thereby lending strong support to the Indexical Hypothesis. Can young children’s reading comprehension be enhanced? Are there potent reading-comprehension strategies that can be identified

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2004-09
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
424-436
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2129995169
Cited by
401
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
reading comprehension, young children, word-object mapping, text comprehension strategies, memory for text, re-reading, early literacy instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review