Cited by 241Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionWorkplace Violence and Bullying

Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review

Berne, S., Frisén, A., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Naruskov, K., Luik, P., Katzer, C., Erentaite, R. +1 more·2013·Aggression and Violent Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.022

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Instruments used to measure cyberbullying often do not align with the conceptualization of cyberbullying and lack adequate reliability and validity testing.

    “For instance, instruments used to measure cyberbullying often do not align with the conceptualization of cyberbullying and lack adequate reliability and validity testing (50, 51).”
  • Debate about the application of these criteria to cyberbullying is ongoing and the absence of consensus on the conceptualization and operation of the phenomenon has hindered efforts to understand and address it.

    “Debate about the application of these criteria to cyberbullying is ongoing and the absence of consensus on the conceptualization and operation of the phenomenon has hindered efforts to understand and address it (Berne et al., 2013;Deschamps & McNutt, 2016;Dooley, Pyzalski, & Cross, 2009;Kota, Schoohs, Benson, & Moreno, 2014;Kowalski et al., 2014;Langos, 2012;Menesini & Nocentini, 2009;Peter & Pet”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berne, S., Frisén, A., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Naruskov, K., Luik, P., Katzer, C., Erentaite, R., & Zukauskiene, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of Tartu (EE)
Corresponding author
Berne, S.
Venue
Aggression and Violent Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
320-334
ISSN
1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987146572
Cited by
241
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
cyberbullying, assessment instruments, psychometric properties, validity, reliability statistics, online harassment, conceptual definitions, instrument selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review