Cited by 1,590Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessPersonality Traits and Psychology

Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model.

Schlenker, Barry R., Leary, Mark R.·1982·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

This article presents a self-presentation approach to the study of social anxiety that proposes that social anxiety arises when people are motivated to make a preferred impression on real or imagined audiences but doubt they will do so, and thus perceive or imagine unsatisfactory evaluative reactions from subjectively important audiences. We presume that specific situational and dispositional antecedents of social anxiety operate by influencing people's motivation to impress others and their expectations of satisfactorily doing so. In contrast to drive models of anxiety but consistent with social learning theory, it is argued that the cognitive state of the individual mediates both affective arousal and behavior. The traditional inverted-U relation between anxiety and performance is reexamined in this light. Implications of the approach for counseling situations are considered, especially the recommendation that treatments be tailored to the specific type of self-presentational problem encountered by clients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.641

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interactions that result in conflict can often be traced to verbal and nonverbal cues that a participant interprets or misinterprets as distrust, disrespect, or anger.

    “Interactions that result in conflict can often be traced to verbal and nonverbal cues that a participant interprets (or misinterprets) as distrust, disrespect, or anger”

    From Police-Community Relations in Cincinnati (2009) · cites this paper as Schlenker and Leary, 1982

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1982-11
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
641-669
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2012577121
Cited by
1,590
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 42
FWCI
13.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
social anxiety, self-presentation, impression management, audience evaluation, anxiety-performance relationship, social learning theory, anxiety treatment, counseling
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review