Cited by 189Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation

Guo, Kai, Zhong, Yuchun, Li, Danling, Chu, Samuel Kai Wah·2023·Computers & Education

DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification
Kim, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1181 · Cited by 14,831
SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS
(2013) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12166 · Cited by 2,739
Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20035 · Cited by 1,596
Teaching and Researching Motivation
Busse, V. (2011) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.04.010 · Cited by 1,402
A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846 · Cited by 1,384
Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective
Wigfield, A. (1994) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf02209024 · Cited by 1,305
Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse
Osborne, J. F. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1183944 · Cited by 951
Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
(2015) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1 · Cited by 819
Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. F. (2005) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690500336957 · Cited by 806
Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger
Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862 · Cited by 770
The human side of human-chatbot interaction: A systematic literature review of ten years of research on text-based chatbots
Rapp, A., Curti, L., & Boldi, A. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102630 · Cited by 733
Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk tasking, and self-regulation.
Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.71.6.1250 · Cited by 604
Rank Analysis of Covariance
Quade, D. (1967) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10500925 · Cited by 543
A review of opportunities and challenges of chatbots in education
Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1952615 · Cited by 530
Key-Value Retrieval Networks for Task-Oriented Dialogue
Eric, M., Krishnan, L., Charette, F., & Manning, C. D. (2017) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-5506 · Cited by 442
Disciplinary Literacies and Learning to Read for Understanding: A Conceptual Framework for Disciplinary Literacy
Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W. R., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C. L., Lee, C. D., Shanahan, C. R., & Project READI (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741 · Cited by 396
Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance
Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816683559 · Cited by 363
Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines
Jonassen, D. H., & Kim, B. (2009) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8 · Cited by 308
Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2008) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y · Cited by 308
An analysis of children’ interaction with an AI chatbot and its impact on their interest in reading
Liu, C.-C., Liao, M.-G., Chang, C.-H., & Lin, H.-M. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104576 · Cited by 240
Developing an AI-based chatbot for practicing responsive teaching in mathematics
Lee, D., & Yeo, S. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646 · Cited by 210
The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012 · Cited by 208
Explanation and Evidence in Informal Argument
Brem, S. K., & Rips, L. J. (2000) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2404_2 · Cited by 202
Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing
Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666 · Cited by 201
Self-citation
Let's Debate: Active Learning Encourages Student Participation and Critical Thinking
Oros, A. L. (2007) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512160701558273 · Cited by 201
Language learning motivation through a small lens: A research agenda
Ushioda, E. (2016) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000173 · Cited by 196
The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers.
Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694 · Cited by 188
A systematic review on the impacts of game-based learning on argumentation skills
Noroozi, O., Dehghanzadeh, H., & Talaee, E. (2020) · Entertainment Computing · doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100369 · Cited by 171
Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing
Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2093914 · Cited by 135
Supporting students’ intrinsic motivation for online learning tasks: The effect of need-supportive task instructions on motivation, self-assessment, and task performance
Mendoza, N. B., Yan, Z., & King, R. B. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104663 · Cited by 122
The evaluation of chatbot as a tool for health literacy education among undergraduate students
Mokmin, N. A. M., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10542-y · Cited by 113
Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032 · Cited by 107
Gender differences in students’ argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments
Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Babaee, M., Ashrafi, H., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887 · Cited by 105
Conversation with a Chatbot before an Online EFL Group Discussion and the Effects on Critical Thinking
Goda, Y., Yamada, M., Matsukawa, H., Hata, K., & Yasunami, S. (2014) · The Journal of Information and Systems in Education · doi:10.12937/ejsise.13.1 · Cited by 102
The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education
el Majidi, A., Janssen, D., & de Graaff, R. (2021) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102576 · Cited by 102
An integrative review of in-class activities that enable active learning in college science classroom settings
Arthurs, L. A., & Kreager, B. Z. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1363925 · Cited by 99
Many Sides: Debate Across the Curriculum
Snider, A., & Schnurer, M. (2002) · Cited by 94
How to Prompt? Opportunities and Challenges of Zero- and Few-Shot Learning for Human-AI Interaction in Creative Applications of Generative Models
Dang, H., Mecke, L., Lehmann, F., Goller, S., & Buschek, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.01390 · Cited by 92
Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online supported peer feedback module to enhance students’ argumentative essay quality
Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J. A., Smits, M., Vervoort, M. T. W., & Verbaan, C.-L. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11683-y · Cited by 83
More or less choice? The influence of choice on task motivation and task engagement
Mozgalina, A. (2015) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.01.004 · Cited by 82
A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing
Fan, C., & Chen, G. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1660685 · Cited by 75
Mathematics teachers' attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation
Ayalon, M., & Hershkowitz, R. (2017) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.010 · Cited by 72
Supporting self-efficacy beliefs and interest as educational inputs and outcomes: Framing AI and Human partnered task experiences
Fryer, L. K., Thompson, A., Nakao, K., Howarth, M., & Gallacher, A. (2020) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101850 · Cited by 71
Directions of the 100 most cited chatbot-related human behavior research: A review of academic publications
Wang, J., Hwang, G., & Chang, C. (2021) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100023 · Cited by 70
Measuring group work dynamics and its relation with L2 learners’ task motivation and language production
Poupore, G. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168815606162 · Cited by 70
Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue
(2018) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-50 · Cited by 70
The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education
Noroozi, O. (2022) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2022.2092188 · Cited by 67
Investigating students’ engagement in chatbot-supported classroom debates
Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2207181 · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Chatbot-based training on logical fallacy in EFL argumentative writing
Zhang, R., Zou, D., & Cheng, G. (2023) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2023.2197417 · Cited by 65
Task Motivation in Process: A Complex Systems Perspective
Poupore, G. (2012) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr.1139 · Cited by 64
Argumentation in science education as a systemic activity: An activity-theoretical perspective
Lazarou, D., Sutherland, R., & Erduran, S. (2016) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.008 · Cited by 58
Dave the debater: a retrieval-based and generative argumentative dialogue agent
Le, D. T., Nguyen, C.-T., & Nguyen, K. A. (2018) · Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5215 · Cited by 52
An investigation of the relationship between argument structure and essay quality in assessed writing
Chuang, P.-L., & Yan, X. (2022) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100892 · Cited by 51
The influence of prior knowledge and collaborative online learning environment on students’ argumentation in descriptive and theoretical scientific concept
Liu, Q.-T., Liu, B.-W., & Lin, Y.-R. (2018) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1545100 · Cited by 49
Using critical questions to evaluate written and oral arguments in an undergraduate general education seminar: a quasi-experimental study
Nussbaum, E. M., Dove, I. J., Slife, N. M., Kardash, C. M., Turgut, R., & Vallett, D. (2018) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9848-3 · Cited by 49
Debbie, the Debate Bot of the Future
Rakshit, G., Bowden, K. K., Reed, L., Misra, A., & Walker, M. (2018) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92108-2_5 · Cited by 37
Against Spoon-Feeding. For Learning. Reflections on Students’ Claims to Knowledge
Dehler, G. E., & Welsh, M. A. (2013) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562913511436 · Cited by 37
A qualitative exploration of student perspectives of chatbot use during emergency remote teaching
Kohnke, L. (2022) · International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation · doi:10.1504/ijmlo.2022.125966 · Cited by 36
Students’ perceptions of debating as a learning strategy: A qualitative study
Rodger, D., & Stewart-Lord, A. (2019) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102681 · Cited by 35
Using Evidence in L2 Argumentative Writing: A Longitudinal Case Study Across High School and University
Kibler, A. K., & Hardigree, C. N. (2016) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12198 · Cited by 35
Enhancing civic education through the use of assigned advocacy, argumentation, and debate across the curriculum
Zorwick, L. W., & Wade, J. M. (2016) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2016.1203005 · Cited by 35
Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining
(2019) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-45 · Cited by 33
The Influence of Content on Adult L2 Learners’ Task Motivation: An Interest Theory Perspective
Poupore, G. (2015) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 32
Impacts of a Digital Dialogue Game and Epistemic Beliefs on Argumentative Discourse and Willingness to Argue
Noroozi, O., McAlister, S., & Mulder, M. (2016) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2297 · Cited by 31
Comfort or safety? Gathering and using the concerns of a participant for better persuasion
Hadoux, E., & Hunter, A. (2019) · Argument & Computation · doi:10.3233/aac-191007 · Cited by 31
The intersection of epistemic beliefs and gender in argumentation performance
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Tassone, V. C. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2198995 · Cited by 29
Methods of Argumentation
Andone, C. (2014) · History and Philosophy of Logic · doi:10.1080/01445340.2014.894711 · Cited by 29
Exploring debaters and audiences’ depth of critical thinking and its relationship with their participation in debate activities
Chen, X., Zhai, X., Zhu, Y., & Li, Y. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101035 · Cited by 24
A debate about the merits of debate in nurse education
Hartin, P., Birks, M., Bodak, M., Woods, C., & Hitchins, M. (2017) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.005 · Cited by 22
Advanced Social Interaction with Agents
Eskénazi, M., Devillers, L. Y., & Mariani, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92108-2 · Cited by 20
ArgueBot: A Conversational Agent for Adaptive Argumentation Feedback
Wambsganß, T., Guggisberg, S., & Söllner, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86797-3_18 · Cited by 20
Fostering Saudi EFL Learners’ Communicative, Collaborative and Critical Thinking Skills Through the Technique of In-Class Debate
Gulnaz, F. (2020) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v10n5p265 · Cited by 15
Evaluating Sources of Evidence for Argumentative Writing: A Collaborative Learning Design
Guo, K., Gu, M. M., & Jin, T. (2021) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3025 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Invest in What Energizes Students to Learn: Investigating Students’ Attitude towards Debate in the Foreign Language Classroom
el Majidi, A., de Graaff, R., & Janssen, D. (2015) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.17507/jltr.0605.03 · Cited by 11
Digitally Scaffolding Debate in the Classroom
Holzer, A., Tintarev, N., Bendahan, S., Kocher, B., Greenup, S., & Gillet, D. (2018) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3170427.3188499 · Cited by 10
Applying Toulmin: Does Peer Response Play a Role in Korean EFL College Students’ Revision Quality?
Huh, M.-H., & 이인환 (2014) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.69.3.201409.3 · Cited by 7
Accounting for the human when designing with AI : challenges identified
Stembert, N., & Harbers, M. (2019) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.1145/3290607 · Cited by 6

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Boekaerts, 2002, The on-line motivation questionnaire: A self-report instrument to assess students' context sensitivity, Vol. 12, 77
el Majidi, 2018, Perceived effect of in-class debates in second language learning, The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 7, 35
Venkovits, 2018, Debating in and outside the classroom: Key benefits, challenges, and how we may help, Werkstattstechnik, 13, 44
Wu, 2023, Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta‐analysis, British Journal of Educational Technology, 1

Sorted by citations

Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review
Law, L. (2024) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174 · Cited by 689
Improving EFL learners' speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions
Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103254 · Cited by 557
ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study
Urban, M., Děchtěrenko, F., Lukavský, J., Hrabalová, V., Svacha, F., Brom, C., & Urban, K. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031 · Cited by 396
Improving elementary EFL speaking skills with generative AI chatbots: Exploring individual and paired interactions
Tai, T., & Chen, H. H.-J. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105112 · Cited by 308
Students’ use of large language models in engineering education: A case study on technology acceptance, perceptions, efficacy, and detection chances
Bernabei, M., Colabianchi, S., Falegnami, A., & Costantino, F. (2023) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100172 · Cited by 218

See all 189

Authors: Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W.
Affiliations: University of Hong Kong (HK)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author: Li, Danling
ORCID: Guo, Kai
Zhong, Yuchun
Li, Danling
Chu, Samuel Kai Wah
Venue: Computers & Education
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2023-10
Volume: 203
Pages: 104862
ISSN: 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862
OpenAlex: W4379619507
Cited by: 188
References: 79
Citations by year: 2026: 59 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 7
FWCI: 17.73
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
Locations: Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords: chatbots, argumentation skills, task motivation, argumentative dialogue, AI-assisted learning, undergraduate students, argument structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks