Cited by 71Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Supporting self-efficacy beliefs and interest as educational inputs and outcomes: Framing AI and Human partnered task experiences

Fryer, Luke K., Thompson, Andrew, Nakao, Kaori, Howarth, Mark, Gallacher, Andrew·2020·Learning and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101850

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies assessing the effect of using chatbots in college students' education had an effect size larger than 0.8, so the effect size in this study was set at 0.8, corresponding to a large effect size as presented by Cohen.

    “Since previous studies that assessed the effect of using chatbot in college students’ education had an effect size larger than 0.8 [7, 20], the effect size in this study was set at 0.8, which corresponds to a large effect size, as presented by Cohen [21].”
  • The choice of a relatively-large effect size of 0.8 in this study was based on previous research examining the effectiveness of chatbots targeting college students, all of which reported effect sizes greater than 0.8.

    “The choice of a relatively-large effect size of 0.8 in this study was based on previous research examining the effectiveness of chatbots targeting college students [26, 27], all of whom reported effect sizes greater than 0.8.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fryer, L. K., Thompson, A., Nakao, K., Howarth, M., & Gallacher, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Kyushu Sangyo University (JP)
  • Seinan Gakuin University (JP)
Corresponding author
Fryer, Luke K.
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
80
Pages
101850
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3026635542
Cited by
71
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
self-efficacy, interest, self-concept, chatbots, AI-assisted language learning, task interest, course interest, Japanese as a second language, university language courses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review