Cited by 428Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthGender Roles and Identity Studies

Stigma in response to mental disorders: a comparison of Australia and Japan

Open access
Griffiths, Kathleen M, Nakane, Yoshibumi, Christensen, Helen, Yoshioka, Kumiko, Jorm, Anthony F, Nakane, Hideyuki·2006·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: There are few national or cross-cultural studies of the stigma associated with mental disorders. Australia and Japan have different systems of psychiatric health care, and distinct differences in cultural values, but enjoy similar standards of living. This study seeks to compare the nature and extent of stigma among the public in the two countries. Methods: A household survey of the public was conducted in each country using similar methodologies. The Australian study comprised a national survey of 3998 adults aged over 18 years. The Japanese survey involved 2000 adults aged 20 to 69 from 25 regional sites distributed across the country. Interviewees reported their personal attitudes (personal stigma, social distance) and perceptions of the attitudes of others (perceived stigma, perceived discrimination) in the community with respect to four case vignettes. These vignettes described a person with: depression; depression with suicidal ideation; early schizophrenia; and chronic schizophrenia. Results: Personal stigma and social distance were typically greater among the Japanese than the Australian public whereas the reverse was true with respect to the perception of the attitudes and discriminatory behaviour of others. In both countries, personal stigma was significantly greater than perceived stigma. The public in both countries showed evidence of greater social distance, greater personal stigma and greater perceived stigma for schizophrenia (particularly in its chronic form) than for depression. There was little evidence of a difference in stigma for depression with and without suicide for either country. However, social distance was greater for chronic compared to early schizophrenia for the Australian public. Conclusion: Stigmatising attitudes were common in both countries, but negative attitudes were greater among the Japanese than the Australian public. The results suggest that there is a need to implement national public awareness interventions tailored to the needs of each country. The current results provide a baseline for future tracking of national stigma levels in each country.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-6-21

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Sartorius N Stigma: what can psychiatrists do about it? Lancet 1998 352 1058 1059 9759771 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08008-8 · DOI
  2. Hocking B Reducing mental illness stigma and discrmination - everybody's business Med J Aust 2003 178 S47 S48 12720521
  3. Crisp AH Cowan L Hart D The College's Anti-Stigma Campaign, 1998-2003: A shortened version of the concluding report Psychiatr Bull 2004 28 133 136 10.1192/pb.28.4.133 · DOI
  4. Wells JE Robins LN Bushnell JA Jarosz D Oakley-Brown MA Perceived barriers to care in St. Louis (USA) and Christchurch (NZ): reasons for not seeking professional help for psychological distress Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1994 29 155 164 7939964
  5. Corrigan PW Edwards AB Green A Diwan SL Penn DL Prejudice, social distance, and familiarity with mental illness. Schizophr Bull 2001 27 219 225 11354589
  6. Link BG Struening EL Rahav M Phelan JC Nuttbrock L On stigma and its consequences: Evidence from a longitudinal study of men with dual diagnoses of mental illness and substance abuse J Health Soc Behav 1997 38 177 190 9212538 10.2307/2955424 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kurumatani T Ukawa K Kawaguchi Y Miyata S Suzuki M Ide H Seki W Chikamori E Hwu HG Liao SC Edwards GD Shinfuku N Uemoto M Teachers' knowledge, beliefs and attitudes concerning schizophrenia: A cross-cultural approach in Japan and Taiwan Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004 39 402 409 15133598 10.1007/s00127-004-0758-0 · DOI
  8. Furnham A Chan E Lay theories of schiozphrenia. A cross-cultural comparison of British and Hong Kong Chinese attitudes, attributions and beliefs. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004 39 543 542 15243692 10.1007/s00127-004-0787-8 · DOI
  9. Kurihara T Kato M Sakamoto S Reverger R Kitamura T Public attitudes towards the mentally ill: A cross-cultural study between Bali and Tokyo. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000 54 547 552 11043804 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00751.x · DOI
  10. Kumakura N Ito H Mori T Saito T Kurisu E Asaka A Sasaki Y Rhi B Kim Y K H Rin H Yang LY Attitude change towards mental illness during nursing education - a cross-cultural study of student nurses in Korea, Republic of China and Japan. Asia Pac J Public Health 1992 6 120 125 1342798
  11. Yamamoto K Randall M Takeda M Leelamanit W Attitudes of medical students towards persons with mental disorders: A comparative study between Japan and Thailand Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1996 50 171 180 9201772
  12. Yamada M Shimosato S Kazama M Tanaka R Panichkul Y Supatra SLP Meekanon P Rojsanyakul W Mori C Investigation of nursing students' attitudes toward people with mental disorders: A comparative study of Thailand and Japan Bulletin of Yamanashi Medical University 2001 18 69 75
  13. Angermeyer MC Beck M Matschinger H Determinants of the public's preference for social distance from people with schizophrenia Can J Psychiatry 2003 48 663 668 14674048
  14. Dietrich S Beck M Bujantugs B Kenzine D Matschinger H Angermeyer MC The relationship between public causal beliefs and social distance toward mentally ill people Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2004 38 348 354 15144513 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01363.x · DOI
  15. Sugiura T Sakamoto S Kijima N Kitamura F Kitamura T Stigmatizing perception of mental illness by Japanese students: Comparison of different psychiatric disorders J Nerv Ment Dis 2000 188 239 242 10790003 10.1097/00005053-200004000-00009 · DOI
  16. Slingsby BT Decision making models in Japanese psychiatry: Transitions from passive to active patterns. Soc Sci Med 2004 59 83 91 15087145 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.006 · DOI
  17. Mino Y Yasuda N Tsuda T Shimodera S Effects of a one-hour educational program on medical students' attitudes to mental illness Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001 55 501 507 11555346 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2001.00896.x · DOI
  18. Hopper K Wanderling J Revisiting the developed versus developing country distinction in course and outcome in schizophrenia: Results from ISoS, the WHO Collaborative Followup Project. Schizophr Bull 2000 26 835 846 11087016
  19. Jorm AF Nakane Y Christensen H Yoshioka K Griffiths KM Wata Y Public beliefs about treatment and outcomes of mental disorders: a comparison of Australia and Japan BMC Medicine 2005 3 12 16004615 10.1186/1741-7015-3-12 PMC1177951 · DOI
  20. Nakane Y Jorm AF Yoshioka K Christensen H Nakane H Griffiths KM Public beliefs about causes and risk factors for mental disorders: a comparison of Japan and Australia BMC Psychiatry 2005 5 33 16174303 10.1186/1471-244X-5-33 PMC1253516 · DOI
  21. Payton ME Greenstone MH Schenker N Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: What do they mean in terms of statistical significance J Insect Sci 2003 3 34 15841249 PMC524673
  22. Kuno E Asukai N Efforts toward building a community-based mental health system in Japan Int J Law Psychiatry 2000 23 361 373 10981277 10.1016/S0160-2527(00)00043-1 · DOI
  23. Penn DL Guynan K Daily T Spaulding WD Garbin CP Sullivan M Dispelling the stigma of schizophrenia: What sort of information is best? Schiz Bull 1994 20 567 578 7973472
  24. Gaebel W Baumann A Witte AM Zaeske H Public attitudes towards people with mental illness in six German cities Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2002 252 278 287 12563536 10.1007/s00406-002-0393-2 · DOI
  25. Jorm AF Christensen H Griffiths KM Changes in depression awareness and attitudes in Australia: the impact of beyondblue: the national depression initiative. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2006 40 42 46 16403036 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01739.x · DOI
  26. Jorm AF Korten AE Jacomb PA Christensen H Henderson S Attitudes towards people with a mental disorder: a survey of the Australian public and health professionals Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1999 33 77 83 10197888 10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00513.x · DOI
  27. Angermeyer MC Matschinger H Public beliefs about schizophrenia and depression: similarities and differences Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2003 38 526 533 14504738 10.1007/s00127-003-0676-6 · DOI
  28. Stuart H Arboleda-Floréz J Community attitudes toward people with schizophrenia Can J Psychiatry 2001 46 245 257 11320678
  29. Tanaka G Inadomi H Kikuchi Y Ohta Y Evaluating stigma against mental disorder and related factors Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2004 58 558 566 15482589 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2004.01300.x · DOI
  30. Lauber C Nordt C Falcato L Rossler W Factors influencing social distance toward people with mental illness Community Ment Health J 2004 40 15259631
  31. Corrigan PW Don't call me nuts. An international perspective on the stigma of mental illness Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004 109 403 404 15117284 10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00316.x · DOI
  32. Tanaka G Ogawa T Inadomi H Kikuchi Y Ohta Y Effects of an educational program on public attitudes towards mental illness Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2003 57 14629708

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffiths, K. M., Nakane, Y., Christensen, H., Yoshioka, K., Jorm, A. F., & Nakane, H.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Nagasaki International University (JP)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Nagasaki University (JP)
Corresponding author
Griffiths, Kathleen M
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2006-05-23
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
21-21
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1589737305
Cited by
428
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 27
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
mental health stigma, personal stigma, perceived stigma, social distance, perceived discrimination, cross-cultural comparison, Australia, Japan, depression, schizophrenia, suicidal ideation, public attitudes, stigma reduction interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Australia, Mental Disorders, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, Public Opinion, Social Conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review