Cited by 114Physiological and biochemical adaptationsRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Paying the brain's energy bill

Open access
Padamsey, Zahid, Rochefort, Nathalie L.·2023·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

How have animals managed to maintain metabolically expensive brains given the volatile and fleeting availability of calories in the natural world? Here we review studies in support of three strategies that involve: 1) a reallocation of energy from peripheral tissues and functions to cover the costs of the brain, 2) an implementation of energy-efficient neural coding, enabling the brain to operate at reduced energy costs, and 3) efficient use of costly neural resources during food scarcity. Collectively, these studies reveal a heterogeneous set of energy-saving mechanisms that make energy-costly brains fit for survival.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2022.102668

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mechanism of emergence of human consciousness is very energy efficient.

    “The mechanism of its emergence is very energy efficient.”

    From There is no such thing as conscious artificial intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Padamsey and Rochefort, 2023

  • The brain uses approximately 400 kCal per day, less than 0.5 kWh.

    “The brain itself uses approximately 400 kCal per day, which is less than 0.5 kWh”

    From There is no such thing as conscious artificial intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Padamsey and Rochefort, 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padamsey, Z., & Rochefort, N. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain (GB)
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
78
Pages
102668
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312211297
Cited by
114
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 11
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (102857/Z/13/Z)
  • Royal Society (102857/Z/13/Z)
  • Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020)
  • Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (MR/X00743X/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/T007907/1)
  • H2020 European Research Council (866386)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
brain energy metabolism, energy reallocation, food shortages, energy conservation, energy-saving mechanisms, animal survival
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Head

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review