Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 570

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex

Chambers, Christopher D.·2013·Cortex
DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Chase, 1976, A statistical power analysis of applied psychological research, Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 234, 10.1037/0021-9010.61.2.234 · DOI
  2. Della Sala, 2013, Nothing endures but change, Cortex, 49, 1, 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.11.003 · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.11.003
  3. Fiedler, 2012, The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 661, 10.1177/1745691612462587 · DOI · Paper page
  4. John, 2012, Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling, Psychological Science, 23, 524, 10.1177/0956797611430953 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Neuroskeptic, 2012, The nine circles of scientific hell, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 643, 10.1177/1745691612459519 · DOI
  6. Tressoldi, 2012, Replication unreliability in psychology: elusive phenomena or “elusive” statistical power?, Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 218, 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00218 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chambers, C. D.
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
609-610
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016
OpenAlex
W2002030061
Cited by
570
References
11
FWCI
36.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.