Cited by 9Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Learning beyond sensations: How dreams organize neuronal representations

Open access
Deperrois, Nicolas, Petrovici, Mihai A., Senn, Walter, Jordan, Jakob·2024·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Semantic representations in higher sensory cortices form the basis for robust, yet flexible behavior. These representations are acquired over the course of development in an unsupervised fashion and continuously maintained over an organism's lifespan. Predictive processing theories propose that these representations emerge from predicting or reconstructing sensory inputs. However, brains are known to generate virtual experiences, such as during imagination and dreaming, that go beyond previously experienced inputs. Here, we suggest that virtual experiences may be just as relevant as actual sensory inputs in shaping cortical representations. In particular, we discuss two complementary learning principles that organize representations through the generation of virtual experiences. First, "adversarial dreaming" proposes that creative dreams support a cortical implementation of adversarial learning in which feedback and feedforward pathways engage in a productive game of trying to fool each other. Second, "contrastive dreaming" proposes that the invariance of neuronal representations to irrelevant factors of variation is acquired by trying to map similar virtual experiences together via a contrastive learning process. These principles are compatible with known cortical structure and dynamics and the phenomenology of sleep thus providing promising directions to explain cortical learning beyond the classical predictive processing paradigm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105508

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative examples in a NREM memory replay can be obtained by pushing the projection of the FF pathway to the higher cortical area away from previous hippocampal memory replays in this higher area.

    “Negative examples in a NREM memory replay can be obtained by pushing the projection of the FF pathway to the higher cortical area away from previous hippocampal memory replays in this higher area [55].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deperrois, N., Petrovici, M. A., Senn, W., & Jordan, J.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Deperrois, Nicolas
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
157
Pages
105508
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389627741
Cited by
9
References
91
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (CRSII5–180316)
  • University of Bern
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (720270, 785907, 945539)
  • Seventh Framework Programme (604102)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
dreams, virtual experience, semantic representation, adversarial learning, contrastive learning, predictive processing, cortical learning, sleep, imagination, unsupervised learning
MeSH terms
Brain, Dreams, Humans, Imagination, Sensation, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review