Cited by 180Memory Processes and InfluencesStatistics Education and MethodologiesInnovative Teaching Methods

Retrieving Essential Material at the End of Lectures Improves Performance on Statistics Exams

Lyle, Keith B., Crawford, Nicole A.·2011·Teaching of Psychology

Abstract

At the end of each lecture in a statistics for psychology course, students answered a small set of questions that required them to retrieve information from the same day’s lecture. These exercises constituted retrieval practice for lecture material subsequently tested on four exams throughout the course. This technique is called the PUREMEM (pronounced “pure mem”) procedure for Pure Memory or Practicing Unassisted Retrieval to Enhance Memory for Essential Material. Exam scores were significantly and substantially higher in a section of the course taught with the PUREMEM procedure than one taught without it. Students liked the procedure and believed it increased learning via several different mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0098628311401587

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar benefits of in-class quizzes in college classes have been seen in a Psychology Research Methods class, an Introductory Psychology class, and a Statistics for Psychology class at large state universities.

    “Similar benefits of in-class quizzes in college classes have been seen in a Psychology Research Methods class (Bjork et al. 2014), in an Introductory Psychology class (Batsell et al. 2017), and in a Statistics for Psychology class (Lyle & Crawford 2011), all of them at large state universities.”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Lyle & Crawford 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyle, K. B., & Crawford, N. A.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Lyle, Keith B.
Venue
Teaching of Psychology
Published
2011-03-23
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
94-97
ISSN
  • 0098-6283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8023
OpenAlex
W2090017607
Cited by
180
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teaching of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
retrieval practice, statistics education, exam performance, memory enhancement, lecture method, student perceptions, statistics in psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review