Cited by 35Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Gut microbiome meta-analysis reveals dysbiosis is independent of body mass index in predicting risk of obesity-associated CRC

Open access
Greathouse, K Leigh, White, James Robert, Padgett, R Noah, Perrotta, Brittany G, Jenkins, Gregory D, Chia, Nicholas, Chen, Jun·2019·BMJ Open Gastroenterology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is a risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), accounting for more than 14% of CRC incidence. Microbial dysbiosis and chronic inflammation are common characteristics in both obesity and CRC. Human and murine studies, together, demonstrate the significant impact of the microbiome in governing energy metabolism and CRC development; yet, little is understood about the contribution of the microbiome to development of obesity-associated CRC as compared to individuals who are not obese. DESIGN: In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis using five publicly available stool and tissue-based 16S rRNA and whole genome sequencing (WGS) data sets of CRC microbiome studies. High-resolution analysis was employed for 16S rRNA data, which allowed us to achieve species-level information to compare with WGS. RESULTS: Characterisation of the confounders between studies, 16S rRNA variable region and sequencing method did not reveal any significant effect on alpha diversity in CRC prediction. Both 16S rRNA and WGS were equally variable in their ability to predict CRC. Results from diversity analysis confirmed lower diversity in obese individuals without CRC; however, no universal differences were found in diversity between obese and non-obese individuals with CRC. When examining taxonomic differences, the probability of being classified as CRC did not change significantly in obese individuals for all taxa tested. However, random forest classification was able to distinguish CRC and non-CRC stool when body mass index was added to the model. CONCLUSION: Overall, microbial dysbiosis was not a significant factor in explaining the higher risk of colon cancer among individuals with obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000247

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The meta-analysis could not establish that these taxa contributed to colorectal cancer development because the included studies were cross-sectional.

    “it could not establish that these taxa contributed to development of CRC, due to the cross-sectional design of the included studies”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greathouse, K. L., White, J. R., Padgett, R. N., Perrotta, B. G., Jenkins, G. D., Chia, N., & Chen, J.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • Resphera Biosciences (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Greathouse, K Leigh
Venue
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e000247
ISSN
2054-4774 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953358317
Cited by
35
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA179243)
  • Baylor University (Summer Research Sabbatical)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Keywords
gut microbiota, colorectal cancer, obesity, dysbiosis, body mass index, alpha diversity, cancer risk prediction, stool microbiome, 16S rRNA, whole genome sequencing, random forest classification, energy metabolism, chronic inflammation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review