Cited by 4Mental Health via WritingDigital Mental Health InterventionsMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Can an online expressive writing program support people with inflammatory bowel disease? A feasibility randomised controlled trial

Open access
Skvarc, David, Evans, Subhadra, Cheah, Suiyin, Cranney, Madeleine, German, Bonnie, Orr, Rebecca, Emerson, Catherine, Olive, Lisa +4 more·2022·Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background We explored feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an online writing intervention (WriteforIBD) against an active control condition for distress in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods A feasibility RCT was conducted in 19 adults (89.5% female, aged 20-69 years) with IBD and mild-moderate distress. Participants allocated to the WriteForIBD group completed a 4-day 30-min writing program adapted for IBD. The active control group wrote about trivial topics provided by researchers. Feasibility was established based on the recruitment and retention while acceptability based on completion rates and a numeric rating scale. All participants completed measures of mental health and disease activity before and after the intervention (one week) and at follow-up three months after the study commencement.Results The retention rate in the study was high (100% WriteForIBD; 82% control). All participants attended every session. 84.2% of participants were satisfied with the intervention. All participants reported a significant improvement in IBD-Control immediately after the intervention; F (2, 33.7) = 7.641, p = .002. A significant interaction of group*time for resilience was noted, R 2 = 0.19, p < .001, with the active control group reporting a significant decline in resilience from the first follow-up to three months while no significant change in resilience for the WriteForIBD group was recorded.Conclusions Online expressive writing is potentially feasible and highly acceptable to people with IBD who report distress. Future large-scale trials should explore the intervention that is adapted from this feasibility study.Registration ID: ACTRN12620000448943p.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101616

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skvarc, D., Evans, S., Cheah, S., Cranney, M., German, B., Orr, R., Emerson, C., Olive, L., Beswick, L., Massuger, W., Raven, L., & Mikocka-Walus, A.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Barwon Health (AU)
  • Crohn's & Colitis Australia (AU)
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
48
Pages
101616
ISSN
1744-3881 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281660707
Cited by
4
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deakin University
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1158487)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
inflammatory bowel disease, expressive writing, psychological distress, resilience, COVID-19 pandemic, feasibility, acceptability, mental health, disease activity
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Chronic Disease, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Writing, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review