Cited by 84Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Dreaming and offline memory processing

Open access
Wamsley, Erin J., Stickgold, Robert·2010·Current Biology

Abstract

The activities of the mind and brain never cease. Although many of our waking hours are spent processing sensory input and executing behavioral responses, moments of unoccupied rest free us to wander through thoughts of the past and future, create daydreams, and imagine fictitious scenarios. During sleep, when attention to sensory input is at a minimum, the mind continues to process information, using memory fragments to create the images, thoughts, and narratives that we commonly call 'dreaming'. Far from being a random or meaningless distraction, spontaneous cognition during states of sleep and resting wakefulness appears to serve important functions related to processing past memories and planning for the future. From single-cell recordings in rodents to behavioral studies in humans, recent studies in the neurosciences suggest a new conception of dreaming as part of a continuum of adaptive cognitive processing occurring across the full range of mind/brain states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.045

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most effective means of triggering dreams that contain partial similarities to real-life events is through repetitive overtraining on a task.

    “First, the most effective means of triggering dreams that contain partial similarities to real-life events is through repetitive overtraining on a task.”

    From The overfitted brain: Dreams evolved to assist generalization (2021) · cites this paper as [130]

    The section “The Offline Reactivation of Memory during Sleep and Quiet Wakefulness” reports that, after extensive play of a game, a third of participants’ sleep-onset dreams contained task-related imagery. It also says dreams commonly incorporate elements of waking experiences without exactly reproducing them. But it does not establish that repetitive overtraining is the most effective way to trigger such dreams. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It seems the most effective way to trigger dreams about something is to have subjects perform on a novel task like Tetris repetitiously, likely because the visual system has become overfitted to the task.

    “For example, it seems the most effective way to trigger dreams about something is to have subjects perform on a novel task like Tetris repetitiously,73,130 likely because the visual system has become overfitted to the task.”

    From The overfitted brain: Dreams evolved to assist generalization (2021) · cites this paper as [130]

    In “The Offline Reactivation of Memory during Sleep and Quiet Wakefulness” (page unavailable), the paper reports that extensive play of an engaging arcade game was followed by task-related imagery in a third of participants’ sleep-onset dreams. It supports the idea that extended task engagement can influence dream content, but does not identify Tetris or establish that repetitive practice is the most effective way to elicit such dreams. The visual-system explanation follows the citations and is not treated as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a link between dream mentation during non-REM sleep and memory consolidation after a nap, although the effect was based on only four subjects who reported task-related mentation.

    “The same group also reported a link between dream mentation during non-REM sleep and memory consolidation after a nap (1303), although the effect was based on only four subjects who actually reported task-related mentation.”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1303]

    The section “The Offline Reactivation of Memory during Sleep and Quiet Wakefulness” reports that participants who described task-related dreams during a nap showed enhanced memory for a virtual maze at retest. Our copy discusses NREM dreaming elsewhere, but does not specify that the nap finding was limited to NREM sleep or state that only four subjects reported task-related mentation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When recent experiences appear in dreams, even in fragmentary form, subsequent memory for those experiences is improved.

    “Importantly, when recent experiences appear in dreams, even in fragmentary form, subsequent memory for those experiences is improved.”

    From Constructive episodic simulation in dreams (2022) · cites this paper as [36]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wamsley, E. J., & Stickgold, R.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Stickgold, Robert
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
20
Issue
23
Pages
R1010-R1013
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071142736
Cited by
84
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32 HL 07901, T32HL007901)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-48832, R01MH048832)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
dreams, sleep, spontaneous cognition, memory consolidation, future planning, daydreaming, single-unit recording, rodent models
MeSH terms
Cognition, Dreams, Humans, Memory, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review