Cited by 289Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsChild and Animal Learning Development

Elements of episodic-like memory in animals.

Open access
Clayton, N. S., Griffiths, D. P., Emery, N. J., Dickinson, A.·2001·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

A number of psychologists have suggested that episodic memory is a uniquely human phenomenon and, until recently, there was little evidence that animals could recall a unique past experience and respond appropriately. Experiments on food-caching memory in scrub jays question this assumption. On the basis of a single caching episode, scrub jays can remember when and where they cached a variety of foods that differ in the rate at which they degrade, in a way that is inexplicable by relative familiarity. They can update their memory of the contents of a cache depending on whether or not they have emptied the cache site, and can also remember where another bird has hidden caches, suggesting that they encode rich representations of the caching event. They make temporal generalizations about when perishable items should degrade and also remember the relative time since caching when the same food is cached in distinct sites at different times. These results show that jays form integrated memories for the location, content and time of caching. This memory capability fulfils Tulving's behavioural criteria for episodic memory and is thus termed 'episodic-like'. We suggest that several features of episodic memory may not be unique to humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2001.0947

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clayton, N. S., Griffiths, D. P., Emery, N. J., & Dickinson, A.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Clayton, N. S.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2001-09-29
Volume
356
Issue
1413
Pages
1483-1491
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2138140089
Cited by
289
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
episodic-like memory, animal memory, scrub jay, temporal memory, spatial memory, temporal generalization, comparative cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Feeding Behavior, Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review