Cited by 114Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Hippocampal activation of Rac1 regulates the forgetting of object recognition memory

Open access
Liu, Yunlong, Du, Shuwen, Lv, Li, Lei, Bo, Shi, Wei, Tang, Yikai, Wang, Lianzhang, Zhong, Yi·2016·Current Biology

Abstract

Forgetting is a universal feature for most types of memories. The best-defined and extensively characterized behaviors that depict forgetting are natural memory decay and interference-based forgetting [1, 2]. Molecular mechanisms underlying the active forgetting remain to be determined for memories in vertebrates. Recent progress has begun to unravel such mechanisms underlying the active forgetting [3-11] that is induced through the behavior-dependent activation of intracellular signaling pathways. In Drosophila, training-induced activation of the small G protein Rac1 mediates natural memory decay and interference-based forgetting of aversive conditioning memory [3]. In mice, the activation of photoactivable-Rac1 in recently potentiated spines in a motor learning task erases the motor memory [12]. These lines of evidence prompted us to investigate a role for Rac1 in time-based natural memory decay and interference-based forgetting in mice. The inhibition of Rac1 activity in hippocampal neurons through targeted expression of a dominant-negative Rac1 form extended object recognition memory from less than 72 hr to over 72 hr, whereas Rac1 activation accelerated memory decay within 24 hr. Interference-induced forgetting of this memory was correlated with Rac1 activation and was completely blocked by inhibition of Rac1 activity. Electrophysiological recordings of long-term potentiation provided independent evidence that further supported a role for Rac1 activation in forgetting. Thus, Rac1-dependent forgetting is evolutionarily conserved from invertebrates to vertebrates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.056

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Du, S., Lv, L., Lei, B., Shi, W., Tang, Y., Wang, L., & Zhong, Y.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhong, Yi
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
26
Issue
17
Pages
2351-2357
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514991315
Cited by
114
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
  • Tsinghua University
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
Rac1, forgetting, object recognition memory, hippocampus, small GTPases, dominant negative Rac1, long-term potentiation, memory consolidation, memory erasure, evolution of memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Neuropeptides, Visual Perception, Long-Term Potentiation, rac1 GTP-Binding Protein, Recognition, Psychology, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review