Cited by 105Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Maternal mindfulness during pregnancy and infant socio-emotional development and temperament: The mediating role of maternal anxiety

van den Heuvel, M.I., Johannes, M.A., Henrichs, J., Van den Bergh, B.R.H.·2015·Early Human Development

Abstract

Background Accumulating evidence shows that maternal anxiety during pregnancy adversely affects child outcomes. The positive effects of maternal psychosocial factors during pregnancy on child outcomes are not yet studied. This prospective study addresses the association between maternal mindfulness during pregnancy and socio-emotional development and temperament in 10months-old infants. We also investigated whether this association was mediated by maternal anxiety.Method Mothers (N=90) provided information about mindfulness and anxiety at the beginning of the second trimester of pregnancy. Infant socio-emotional development (Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social Emotional; ASQ:SE) and temperament (Infant Behaviour Questionnaire-Revised; IBQ-R) were assessed at age 10months.Results Higher maternal mindfulness during pregnancy was associated with less infant self-regulation problems and less infant negative affectivity. Mediation analysis showed that maternal anxiety mediated the association between infant self-regulation problems and maternal mindfulness.Conclusion These results suggest that maternal mindfulness during pregnancy may have positive effects on infant development. This association may be mediated by reduced anxiety symptoms in pregnant women who score high on mindfulness. Additional replication studies are needed using objective measures of infant behavioural/emotional outcomes and mindfulness of the mother during child development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.12.003

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Heuvel, M. I., Johannes, M. A., Henrichs, J., & Van den Bergh, B. R. H.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Venue
Early Human Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
103-108
ISSN
0378-3782 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973825058
Cited by
105
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Science Foundation
  • European Commission Seventh Framework Programme (279281)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
pregnancy, maternal anxiety, infant temperament, negative affectivity, mediation, infant behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Development, Emotions, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Social Behavior, Temperament, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review