Cited by 37Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringSleep and related disorders

Feasibility of Single Channel Oximetry for Mass Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Open access
Behar, Joachim A., Palmius, Niclas, Li, Qiao, Garbuio, Silverio, Rizzatti, Fabìola P.G., Bittencourt, Lia, Tufik, Sergio, Clifford, Gari D.·2019·EClinicalMedicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growing awareness for the high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) coupled with the dramatic proportion of undiagnosed individuals motivates the elaboration of a simple but accurate screening test. This study assesses, for the first time, the performance of oximetry combined with demographic information as a screening tool for identifying OSA in a representative (i.e. non-referred) population sample. METHODS: A polysomnography (PSG) clinical database of 887 individuals from a representative population sample of São Paulo's city (Brazil) was used. Using features derived from the oxygen saturation signal during sleep periods and demographic information, a logistic regression model (termed OxyDOSA) was trained to distinguish between non-OSA and OSA individuals (mild, moderate, and severe). The OxyDOSA model performance was assessed against the PSG-based diagnosis of OSA (AASM 2017) and compared to the NoSAS and STOP-BANG questionnaires. FINDINGS: The OxyDOSA model had mean AUROC = 0.94 ± 0.02, Se = 0.87 ± 0.04 and Sp = 0.85 ± 0.03. In particular, it did not miss any of the 75 severe OSA individuals. In comparison, the NoSAS questionnaire had AUROC = 0.83 ± 0.03, and missed 23/75 severe OSA individuals. The STOP-BANG had AUROC = 0.77 ± 0.04 and missed 14/75 severe OSA individuals. INTERPRETATION: We provide strong evidence on a representative population sample that oximetry biomarkers combined with few demographic information, the OxyDOSA model, is an effective screening tool for OSA. Our results suggest that sleep questionnaires should be used with caution for OSA screening as they fail to identify many moderate and even some severe cases. The OxyDOSA model will need to be further validated on data recorded using overnight portable oximetry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.05.015

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A model has been developed to identify OSA using data that could be obtained from a wearable user (pulse oximetry biomarkers and demographic information).

    “a model has been developed to identify OSA using data, which could be obtained from a wearable user (pulse oximetry biomarkers and demographic information)”

    From Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [206]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Pack A. Sleep apnea: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment 2016 CRC Press Pack A. Sleep apnea: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. CRC Press, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behar, J. A., Palmius, N., Li, Q., Garbuio, S., Rizzatti, F. P. G., Bittencourt, L., Tufik, S., & Clifford, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Behar, Joachim A.
Venue
EClinicalMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
11
Pages
81-88
ISSN
2589-5370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950062353
Cited by
37
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EClinicalMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (306138/2017-4, 309336/2017-1, 401569/2016-0)
  • Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, sleep apnea screening, oxygen saturation, logistic regression, polysomnography, STOP-BANG questionnaire, NoSAS, sleep questionnaires, demographic factors, undiagnosed sleep apnea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review