Cited by 20Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringSleep and related disorders

Single-channel oximetry monitor versus in-lab polysomnography oximetry analysis: does it make a difference?

Behar, Joachim A, Palmius, Niclas, Zacharie, Sroussi, Chocron, Armand, Penzel, Thomas, Bittencourt, Lia, Tufik, Sergio·2020·Physiological Measurement

Abstract

Objective : Portable oximetry has been shown to be a promising candidate for large-scale obstructive sleep apnea screening. In polysomnography (PSG), the gold standard OSA diagnosis test, the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) is usually computed from desaturation events occurring during sleep periods only, i.e. overnight desaturations occurring during or overlapping with a wake state are excluded. However, for unattended home oximetry, all desaturations are taken into account since no reference electroencephalogram is available for sleep staging. We aim to evaluate the hypothesis that the predictive power of oximetry for OSA screening is not impaired when reference sleep stages are not available. Approach : We used a PSG clinical database of 887 individuals from a representative São Paulo (Brazil) population sample. Using features derived from the oxygen saturation time series and demographic information, OxyDOSA, a published machine learning model, was trained to distinguish between non-OSA and OSA individuals using the ODI computed while including versus excluding overnight desaturations overlapping with a wake period, thus mimicking portable and PSG oximetry analyses, respectively. Main results : When excluding wake desaturations, the OxyDOSA model had an AUROC = 94.9 ± 1.6, Se = 85.9 ± 2.8, Sp = 90.1 ± 2.6 and F 1 = 86.4 ± 2.7. When considering wake desaturations, the OxyDOSA model had an AUROC = 94.4 ± 1.6, Se = 88.0 ± 2.0, Sp = 87.7 ± 2.9 and F 1 = 86.2 ± 2.4. Non-inferiority was demonstrated (p = 0.049) at a tolerance level of 3%. In addition, analysis of the desaturations excluded by PSG oximetry analysis suggests that up to 21% of the total number of desaturations might actually be related to apneas or hypopneas. Significance : This analysis of a large representative population sample provided strong evidence that the predictive power of oximetry for OSA screening using the OxyDOSA model is not impaired when reference sleep stages are not available. This finding motivates the usage of portable oximetry for OSA screening.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6579/ab8856

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The performance of this OSA model was found not to be impaired when the reference sleep stages provided by screening in clinical practice were unavailable.

    “the performance of this model was found not to be impaired when the reference sleep stages provided by screening in clinical practice were unavailable”

    From Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [213]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behar, J. A., Palmius, N., Zacharie, S., Chocron, A., Penzel, T., Bittencourt, L., & Tufik, S.
Affiliations
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
Corresponding author
Behar, Joachim A
Venue
Physiological Measurement
Published
2020-04-01
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
044007
ISSN
  • 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6579
OpenAlex
W3016180556
Cited by
20
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiological Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (306138/2017-4)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, sleep apnea screening, oxygen desaturation index, sleep stage classification, machine learning prediction models, non-inferiority, hypopnea, apnea
MeSH terms
Electroencephalography, Humans, Laboratories, Monitoring, Physiologic, Oximetry, Databases, Factual, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review