Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,981

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models

Grimm, Volker, Berger, Uta, Bastiansen, Finn, Eliassen, Sigrunn, Ginot, Vincent, Giske, Jarl, Goss-Custard, John, Grand, Tamara, Heinz, Simone K., Huse, Geir, Huth, Andreas, Jepsen, Jane U., Jørgensen, Christian, Mooij, Wolf M., Müller, Birgit, Pe’er, Guy, Piou, Cyril, Railsback, Steven F., Robbins, Andrew M., Robbins, Martha M., Rossmanith, Eva, Rüger, Nadja, Strand, Espen, Souissi, Sami, Stillman, Richard A., Vabø, Rune, Visser, Ute, DeAngelis, Donald L.·2006·Ecological Modelling
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Aber, 1997, Why don’t we believe the models?, Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am., 78, 232, 10.2307/20168170 · DOI
  2. Botkin, 1972, Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth, J. Ecol., 60, 849, 10.2307/2258570 · DOI · Paper page
  3. DeAngelis, 1980, Cannibalism and size dispersal in young-of-the-year largemouth bass: experiment and model, Ecol. Model., 8, 133, 10.1016/0304-3800(80)90033-2 · DOI
  4. DeAngelis, 2005, Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 36, 147, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152644 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Deutschman, 1997, Scaling from trees to forests: analysis of a complex simulation model, Science, 277, 1688, 10.1126/science.277.5332.1684b · DOI
  6. Dorndorf, N., 1999. Zur Populationsdynamik des Alpenmurmeltiers: Modellierung, Gefährdungsanalyse und Bedeutung des Sozialverhaltens für die Überlebensfähigkeit. Ph.D. Thesis. Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.
  7. Edmonds, 2003, Replication, replication, and replication: some hard lessons from model alignment, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 6
  8. Ginot, 2002, A multi-agents architecture to enhance end-user individual-based modelling, Ecol. Model., 157, 23, 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00211-9 · DOI
  9. Gopen, 1990, The science of scientific writing, Am. Sci., 78, 550
  10. Grimm, 1999, Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: What have we learned, and what could we learn in the future?, Ecol. Model., 115, 129, 10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00188-4 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Grimm, 2002, Visual debugging: a way of analyzing, understanding, and communicating bottom-up simulation models in ecology, Nat. Res. Model., 15, 23, 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2002.tb00078.x · DOI
  12. Grimm, 2003, Modelling the role of social behavior in the persistence of the alpine marmot Marmota marmota, Oikos, 102, 124, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11731.x · DOI
  13. Grimm, 2004, The intrinsic mean time to extinction: a unifying approach to analyzing persistence and viability of populations, Oikos, 105, 501, 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12606.x · DOI
  14. Grimm, 1999, Individual-based modelling and ecological theory: synthesis of a workshop, Ecol. Model., 115, 275, 10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00186-0 · DOI
  15. Hackländer, 1999, Male-caused failure of female reproduction and its adaptive value in alpine marmots (Marmota marmota), Behav. Ecol., 10, 592, 10.1093/beheco/10.5.592 · DOI
  16. Hales, 2003, Model-to-model analysis, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 6
  17. Huth, 1992, The simulation of the movement of fish schools, J. Theor. Biol., 156, 365, 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80681-2 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Huth, 1994, The simulation of fish schools in comparison with experimental data., Ecol. Model., 75–76, 135, 10.1016/0304-3800(94)90013-2 · DOI
  19. Inada, 2002, Order and flexibility in the motion of fish schools, J. Theor. Biol., 214, 371, 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2449 · DOI
  20. Kunz, 2003, Artificial fish schools: collective effects of school size, body size, and form, Artif. Life, 9, 237, 10.1162/106454603322392451 · DOI
  21. Liu, 1995, Individual-based simulation models for forest succession and management, Forest Ecol. Manage., 73, 157, 10.1016/0378-1127(94)03490-N · DOI
  22. Lorek, 1999, Modelling and simulation software to support individual-oriented ecological modelling, Ecol. Model., 115, 199, 10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00193-8 · DOI
  23. Parker, 2003, Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 93, 314, 10.1111/1467-8306.9302004 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Peck, 2004, Simulation as experiment: a philosophical reassessment for biological modeling, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 530, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.019 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Pitt, 2003, An individual-based model of canid populations: modelling territoriality and social structure, Ecol. Model., 166, 109, 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00130-3 · DOI
  26. Railsback, 2001, Concepts from complex adaptive systems as a framework for individual-based modelling, Ecol. Model., 139, 47, 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00228-9 · DOI
  27. Reuter, 1994, Selforganization of fish schools: an object-oriented model., Ecol. Model., 75/76, 147, 10.1016/0304-3800(94)90014-0 · DOI
  28. Rouchier, 2003, Re-implementation of a multi-agent model aimed at sustaining experimental economic research: the case of simulations with emerging speculation, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 6
  29. Shugart, 1992, The potential for application of individual-based simulation models for assessing the effects of global change, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 23, 15, 10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000311 · DOI
  30. Strand, 2002, Artificial evolution of life history and behavior, Am. Nat., 159, 624, 10.1086/339997 · DOI
  31. Tesfatsion, 2002, Agent-based computational economics: growing economies from the bottom up, Artif. Life, 8, 55, 10.1162/106454602753694765 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Tyler, 1994, Individual variability and spatial heterogeneity in fish population models, Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries, 4, 91, 10.1007/BF00043262 · DOI
  33. Van Winkle, 1993, Individual-based approach to fish population dynamics: an overview, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 122, 397, 10.1577/1548-8659(1993)122<0397:IBATFP>2.3.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Grimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., Eliassen, S., Ginot, V., Giske, J., Goss-Custard, J., Grand, T., Heinz, S. K., Huse, G., Huth, A., Jepsen, J. U., Jørgensen, C., Mooij, W. M., Müller, B., Pe’er, G., Piou, C., Railsback, S. F., Robbins, A. M., Robbins, M. M., Rossmanith, E., Rüger, N., Strand, E., Souissi, S., Stillman, R. A., Vabø, R., Visser, U., & DeAngelis, D. L.
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
198
Issue
1-2
Pages
115-126
ISSN
0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023
OpenAlex
W2145408484
Cited by
2,981
References
0
FWCI
76.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.