Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 59

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using think-aloud protocol in self-regulated reading research

Hu, Jingjing, Gao, Xuesong (Andy)·2017·Educational Research Review
DOI 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Afflerbach, 1984, Research methodology on the use of verbal reports in reading research, Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 307, 10.1080/10862968409547524 · DOI
  2. Azevedo, 2004, Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia?, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Azevedo, 2004, The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students' conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87, 10.2190/DVWX-GM1T-6THQ-5WC7 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Azevedo, 2005, Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia, Instructional Science, 33, 381, 10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Azevedo, 2007, The effect of a human agent's external regulation upon college students' hypermedia learning, Metacognition and Learning, 2, 67, 10.1007/s11409-007-9014-9 · DOI
  6. Baker, 1984, Metacognitive skills and reading, Handbook of Reading Research, 1, V394
  7. Barkaoui, 2011, Think-aloud protocols in research on essay rating: An empirical study of their veridicality and reactivity, Language Testing, 28, 51, 10.1177/0265532210376379 · DOI
  8. Baumann, 1992, Effect of think-aloud instruction on elementary students' comprehension monitoring abilities, Journal of Literacy Research, 24, 143
  9. Bernacki, 2012, The effects of achievement goals and self-regulated learning behaviors on reading comprehension in technology-enhanced learning environments, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 148, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.12.001 · DOI
  10. Bowles, 2010, Concurrent verbal reports in second language acquisition research, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 3010, 111, 10.1017/S0267190510000036 · DOI
  11. Bowles, 2005, Vol. 27, 415
  12. Branch, 2001, Junior high students and think alouds: Generating information-seeking process data using concurrent verbal protocols, Library and Information Science Research, 23, 107, 10.1016/S0740-8188(01)00065-2 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Bråten, 2004, Does the influence of reading purpose on reports of strategic text processing depend on students' topic knowledge?, Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 324, 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.324 · DOI
  14. Bråten, 2003, A longitudinal think-aloud study of spontaneous strategic processing during the reading of multiple expository texts, Reading and Writing, 16, 195, 10.1023/A:1022895207490 · DOI
  15. van den Broek, 2001, The effects of readers' goals on inference generation and memory for texts, Memory & Cognition, 29, 1081, 10.3758/BF03206376 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Coiro, 2007, Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet, Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 214, 10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Crain-Thoreson, 1997, Windows on comprehension: Reading comprehension processes as revealed by two think-aloud procedures, Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 579, 10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.579 · DOI
  18. Cromley, 2006, Self-report of reading comprehension strategies : What are we measuring?, Metacognition and Learning, 1, 229, 10.1007/s11409-006-9002-5 · DOI
  19. Cumming, 2002, Decision making while rating ESL/EFL writing tasks: A descriptive framework, The Modern Language Journal, 86, 67, 10.1111/1540-4781.00137 · DOI
  20. Denton, 2015, Text-processing differences in adolescent adequate and poor comprehenders reading accessible and challenging narrative and informational text, Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 393, 10.1002/rrq.105 · DOI
  21. Fadlelmula, 2010, How a learner self-regulates reading comprehension : A case study for graduate level reading, US-China Education Review, 7, 22
  22. Goldma, 2012, Comprehending and learning from internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners, Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 356, 10.1002/RRQ.027 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Greene, 2007, Adolescents' use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 125, 10.2190/G7M1-2734-3JRR-8033 · DOI
  24. Greene, 2009, A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 18, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Griffiths, 2015, What have we learnt from “ good language learners ”?, ELT Journal, 69, 425, 10.1093/elt/ccv040 · DOI
  26. Hu, J. Gao, X. in press. Self-regulated strategic writing for academic studies in an English-medium-instruction context. Language and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1373804. · DOI
  27. Jiménez, 1995, Three children, two languages, and strategic reading: Case studies in bilingual/monolingual reading, American Educational Research Journal, 32, 67, 10.3102/00028312032001067 · DOI
  28. Juliebo, 1998, Metacognition of young readers in an early intervention programme, Journal of Research in Reading, 21, 24, 10.1111/1467-9817.00040 · DOI
  29. Kendeou, 2007, The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts, Memory & Cognition, 35, 1567, 10.3758/BF03193491 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kinnunen, 1995, Comprehension monitoring and the level of comprehension in high- and low-achieving primary school children's reading, Learning and Instruction, 5, 143, 10.1016/0959-4752(95)00009-R · DOI
  31. Linderholm, 2002, The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778, 10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.778 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.778 · Paper page
  32. Liyanage, 2011, Gender and language learning strategies: Looking beyond the categories, The Language Learning Journal, 40, 237, 10.1080/09571736.2011.574818 · DOI
  33. Mateos, 2008, Reading and writing to learn in secondary education: Online processing activity and written products in summarizing and synthesizing tasks, Reading and Writing, 21, 675, 10.1007/s11145-007-9086-6 · DOI
  34. de Milliano, 2016, Types and sequences of self-regulated reading of low-achieving adolescents in relation to reading task achievement, Journal of Research in Reading, 39, 229, 10.1111/1467-9817.12037 · DOI
  35. Moos, 2008, Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: The impact of conceptual scaffolds, Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1686, 10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.001 · DOI
  36. Narvaez, 1999, The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 488, 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.488 · DOI
  37. Rayner, 2009, Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 10.1080/17470210902816461 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Robinson, 2001, The validity of verbal reports in children’ s subtraction, Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 211, 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.211 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.211
  39. Rogers, 1991, Students as literary critics: The interpretive experiences, beliefs, and processes of ninth-grade students, Journal of Literacy Research, 23, 391
  40. Rogers, 2016, Implicit and explicit knowledge of L2 inflectional morphology, Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 781, 10.1017/S0142716415000247 · DOI
  41. Roohani, 2015, Effects of self-regulated strategy development on EFL learners' reading comprehension and metacognition, GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 15, 31
  42. Scott, 2008, Assessing text processing: A comparison of four methods, Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 290, 10.1080/10862960802502162 · DOI
  43. Veenman, 2005, Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences, Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159, 10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Veenman, 2006, Metacognition and learning : Conceptual and methodological considerations, Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3, 10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Veenman, 2004, The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective, Learning and Instruction, 14, 89, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Yang, 2015, Methodological considerations in second language writing research: A critical appraisal of the think-aloud technique, Second Language Learning Research, 1, 41
  47. Zhang, 2008, Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom, Instructional Science, 36, 89, 10.1007/s11251-007-9025-6 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hu, J., & Gao, X. (.
ORCID
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
22
Pages
181-193
ISSN
1747-938X
DOI
10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.004
Cited by
59
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Standing Committee on Language Education and Research (SCOLAR) (EDB(LE)/P&R/EL/164/19)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.