Cited by 1,537Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making StudiesPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

The affect heuristic

Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa L., Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G.·2007·European Journal of Operational Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inverse relation between expectations of risk and returns is consistent with judgments based on affect rather than reason.

    “This pattern of an inverse relation between expectations of risk and returns is consistent with judgments based on aect, rather than reason (e.g., Slovic et al. 2004Slovic et al. , 2005Slovic et al. , 2007;;Finucane et al. 2000).”
  • Much evidence demonstrates the significant role of affect in human judgment.

    “Much evidence demonstrates the significant role of affect in human judgment (Lerner et al., 2015; Loewenstein et al., 2001; Slovic et al., 2007).”

    From Everyone I Don’t Like Is Biased: Affective Evaluations and the Bias Blind Spot (2026) · cites this paper as Slovic et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G.
Affiliations
Decision Research (US)
Corresponding author
Slovic, Paul
Venue
European Journal of Operational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
177
Issue
3
Pages
1333-1352
ISSN
0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4246833228
Cited by
1,537
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 171 · 2025: 153 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 27
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Operational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
affect heuristic, affect, judgment and decision making, emotional responses, heuristic theory, positive and negative affect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review