Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 672

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention

Lu, Yaobin, Zhao, Ling, Wang, Bin·2010·Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
DOI 10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.003

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Armstrong, 1996, The real value of on-line communities, Harvard Business Review, 74, 134
  2. Ba, 2001, Establishing online trust through a community responsibility system, Decision Support Systems, 31, 323, 10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00144-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baier, 1986, Trust and antitrust, Ethics, 96, 231, 10.1086/292745 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bughin, 2001, The marketing scale effectiveness of virtual communities, Electronic Markets, 11, 258, 10.1080/101967801753405544 · DOI
  5. Chau, 1997, Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach, Decision Sciences, 28, 309, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01313.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chen, 2007, Understanding the emerging C2C electronic market in China: an experience-seeking social marketplace, Electronic Markets, 17, 86, 10.1080/10196780701292468 · DOI
  7. Feng, 2004, Empathic and predictable communication influences online interpersonal trust, Behavior and Information Technology, 23, 97, 10.1080/01449290310001659240 · DOI
  8. Fussell, 2006, The relationship between social capital, transaction costs, and organizational outcomes: a case study, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11, 148, 10.1108/13563280610661688 · DOI
  9. Gefen, D. Building Users’ Trust in Freeware Providers and the Effects of this Trust on Users’ Perceptions of Usefulness, Ease of Use and Intended Use of Freeware. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, 1997.
  10. Gefen, 2000, E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust, Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 28, 725, 10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00021-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gefen, 2002, Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers, ACM SIGMIS Database, 33, 38, 10.1145/569905.569910 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gulati, 1995, Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85, 10.2307/256729 · DOI
  13. Ives, 1984, The information system as a competitive weapon, Communications of the ACM, 27, 1193, 10.1145/2135.2137 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Jin, 1999, Explaining cybermediation: an organizational analysis of electronic retailing, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3, 47, 10.1080/10864415.1999.11518348 · DOI
  15. Jones, 2000, Time to split, virtually: ‘discourse architecture’ and ‘community building’ create vibrant virtual publics, Electronic Markets, 10, 214, 10.1080/101967800750050326 · DOI
  16. Kankanhalli, 2005, Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly, 29, 113, 10.2307/25148670 · DOI
  17. Kim, 2003, A multidimensional trust formation model in B2C e-commerce: A conceptual framework and content analyses of academia/practitioner perspectives, Decision Support Systems, 40, 143, 10.1016/j.dss.2004.01.006 · DOI
  18. Koh, 2004, Sense of virtual community: a conceptual framework and empirical validation, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8, 75, 10.1080/10864415.2003.11044295 · DOI
  19. Lee, 2003, Virtual community informatics: a review and research agenda, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 5, 47
  20. Lin, 2006, Understanding behavioral intention to participate in virtual communities, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 540, 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.540 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lu, 2007, A research of consumer’s initial trust in online stores in China, Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 39, 167
  22. McKnight, 2002, The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 297, 10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00020-3 · DOI · Paper page
  23. McKnight, 1998, Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships, Academy of Management Review, 23, 473, 10.2307/259290 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pavlou, 2006, Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior, MIS Quarterly, 30, 115, 10.2307/25148720 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Porter, 2008, Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities, Management Science, 54, 113, 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0765 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Rothaermel, 2001, Virtual internet communities and commercial success: individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of TimeZone.Com, Journal of Management, 27, 297, 10.1177/014920630102700305 · DOI
  27. Rotter, 1967, A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust, Journal of Personality, 35, 651, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. Rousseau, 1998, Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust, Academy of Management Review, 23, 393, 10.5465/amr.1998.926617 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Shankar, 2002, Online trust: a stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 325, 10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00022-7 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Smith, D. N. Trust Me, Would I Steer You Wrong? The Influence of Peer Recommendations within Virtual Communities. Doctoral Thesis, University of Illinois, Chicago, 2002.
  31. Stewart, 2003, Trust transfer on the World Wide Web, Organization Science, 14, 5, 10.1287/orsc.14.1.5.12810 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Tung, L. L., Tan, P. L. J., Chia, P. J. T., Koh, Y. L., and Yeo, H. L. An empirical investigation of virtual communities and trust. In Twenty-Second International Conference on Information Systems, 2001.
  33. Wang, 2007, Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs, Journal of Management Information Systems, 223, 217, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230410 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Williams, 2000, Four smart ways to run online communities, Sloan Management Review, 41, 81
  35. Wu, 2005, Toward understanding members’ interactivity, trust, and flow in online travel community, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105, 937, 10.1108/02635570510616120 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Ziegler, 2007, Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity, Decision Support Systems, 43, 460, 10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.003 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lu, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, B.
Venue
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
346-360
ISSN
1567-4223 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.003
OpenAlex
W2092401734
Cited by
672
References
19
FWCI
52.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (70731001)
  • Ministry of Education (NCET-08-0233)
  • Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.