The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling with stakeholders☆
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also, as in most PM projects, the participatory process fostered by the modelling exercise becomes even more important than its output (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
From Towards integrated management of sandy anthropogenic shores: Developing tools for the exploration of human-natural interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Voinov and Bousquet, 2010
In the citing paper
“the participatory approach is a co-learning and co-understanding approach in which engagement helps to clarify differing perspectives and align values among the various participants, fostering a shared understanding (Voinov and Bousquet (2010).”
From Towards integrated management of sandy anthropogenic shores: Developing tools for the exploration of human-natural interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Voinov and Bousquet (2010)
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
Checkland, P. B. (1981) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 6,256
Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review
Reed, M. S. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 · Cited by 4,689
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2 · Cited by 4,207
Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources
Elinor Ostrom, B., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9739 · Cited by 3,869
Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources.
Rutherford, A. A., & Walters, C. (1987) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531565 · Cited by 3,334
Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social?Ecological Systems
Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7 · Cited by 1,863
Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture
Pretty, J. N. (1995) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(95)00046-f · Cited by 1,753
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Characterising performance of environmental models
Bennett, N. D., Croke, B. F. W., Guariso, G., Guillaume, J. H. A., Hamilton, S. H., Jakeman, A. J., Marsili-Libelli, S., Newham, L. T. H., Norton, J. P., Perrin, C., et al. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011 · Cited by 1,536
“…the accuracy of its predictive power, but by other outcomes, including communityand capacity-building, and the ontological and educational functionality that it brings to groups of stakeholders or users who gain from being part of modelling process (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010; Krueger et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationKelly, R., Jakeman, A. J., Barreteau, O., Borsuk, M. E., Elsawah, S., Hamilton, S. H., Henriksen, H. J., Kuikka, S., Maier, H. R., Rizzoli, A. E., et al. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005 · Cited by 812
“…assessment models or tools to enhance the effectiveness of decision-making andmanagement has beenwidely acknowledged (see for example Bland, 1999; Voinov and Bousquet 2010; Carnevale et al., 2012; Hong et al., 2012; Jakeman and Letcher, 2003; Gough et al., 1998; Kragt et al., 2011; Liu et al.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationViviroli, D., Archer, D., Buytaert, W., Fowler, H. J., Greenwood, G. B., Hamlet, A. F., Huang, Y., Koboltschnig, G. R., Litaor, M. I., López‐Moreno, J. I., et al. (2011) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-15-471-2011 · Cited by 702
“A promising approach is also the inclusion of local stakeholders in the monitoring and modelling process, which fosters ownership and knowledge dissemination and at the same time decreases costs and improves quality (e.g. Roa Garc ı́a nd Brown, 2009; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundBayesian networks in environmental modelling
Aguilera, P. A., Fernández, A., Fernández, R., Rumí, R., & Salmerón, A. (2011) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.06.004 · Cited by 671
Good practice in Bayesian network modelling
Chen, S. H., & Pollino, C. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.012 · Cited by 659
Modelling with stakeholders – Next generation
Voinov, A. A., Kolagani, N., McCall, M. K., Glynn, P. D., Kragt, M. E., Ostermann, F., Pierce, S. A., & Ramu, P. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.016 · Cited by 642
Self-citationDesigning agroecological transitions; A review
Duru, M., Therond, O., & Fares, M. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x · Cited by 542
“Besides having modelling structures suitable for representing the dynamics at hand, they represent social-ecological system using concepts similar to those that stakeholders usually use and thus are relatively intuitive for stakeholders (Voinov and Bousque 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Role of Expert Opinion in Environmental Modelling
Krueger, T., Page, T., Hubacek, K., Smith, L., & Hiscock, K. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011 · Cited by 413
“This perspective offers a substantive rationale for 6 participatory modelling (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010, focussing on the instrumental 7 rationale), which will be discussed but is not the main focus of the paper.”
BackgroundIntegrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future
Laniak, G. F., Olchin, G., Goodall, J. L., Voinov, A. A., Hill, M. C., Glynn, P. D., Whelan, G., Geller, G. N., Quinn, N. W. T., Blind, M. W., et al. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.006 · Cited by 478
“The challenge is to foster and promote participation in a coordinated manner across the full community, which is often easier said than done (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationTools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job
Voinov, A., Jenni, K., Gray, S., Kolagani, N., Glynn, P. D., Bommel, P., Prell, C., Zellner, M., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., et al. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028 · Cited by 428
“This issue creates a dilemma: claiming a “ neutral posture ” by inviting all relevant people may further strengthen the most powerful actors, while adopting a non-neutral posture to empower the weakest actors may compromise the legitimacy of the process (Barnaud and Van Paassen, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPotential applications of subseasonal‐to‐seasonal ( S2S ) predictions
White, C. J., Carlsen, H., Robertson, A. W., Klein, R. J. T., Lazo, J. K., Kumar, A., Vitart, F., de Perez, E. C., Ray, A. J., Murray, V. S. G., et al. (2017) · Meteorological Applications · doi:10.1002/met.1654 · Cited by 515
“Scientists and users could co-develop tools and processes for fostering the joint development of S2S predictions, with stakeholder-based modelling (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010) or co-exploration/co-production processes (Lemos and Morehouse, 2005; Meadow et al.”
BackgroundTurner, K. G., Anderson, S., González-Chang, M., Costanza, R., Courville, S., Dalgaard, T., Dominati, E., Ida Kubiszewski, A., Ogilvy, S., Porfirio, L. L., et al. (2015) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.07.017 · Cited by 380
Self-citationThe Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems
Biggs, R., Preiser, R., de Vos, A., Schlüter, M., Maciejewski, K., & Clements, H. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003021339 · Cited by 435
Geo-Wiki: An online platform for improving global land cover
Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Perger, C., See, L., Schepaschenko, D. G., van der Velde, M., Kraxner, F., & Obersteiner, M. H. (2011) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.015 · Cited by 332
“…Geo-Wiki team of scientists must be active within this community, raising awareness of land cover issues; initiating campaigns; providing updates on the effects of collective user contributions; and generally guiding the crowd in a type of collaborative learning process (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundThe Complexities of Agent-Based Modeling Output Analysis
Lee, J.-., Filatova, T., Ligmann-Zielińska, A., Hassani‐Mahmooei, B., Stonedahl, F., Lorscheid, I., Voinov, A. A., Polhill, G. J., Sun, Z., & Parker, D. C. (2015) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.2897 · Cited by 327
“This participatory modelling is a powerful strategy to facilitate decision-making, management, and consensus building (Voinov & Bousquet 2010).”
MethodSelf-citationEnvironmental decision support systems (EDSS) development – Challenges and best practices
McIntosh, B. S., Ascough, J. C., Twery, M. J., Chew, J. D., Elmahdi, A., Haase, D., Harou, J., Hepting, D. H., Cuddy, S., Jakeman, A. J., et al. (2011) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.009 · Cited by 326
Self-citationAgroecological principles for the redesign of integrated crop–livestock systems
Bonaudo, T., Bendahan, A. B., Sabatier, R., Ryschawy, J., Bellon, S., Léger, F. G., Magda, D. D., & Tichit, M. (2013) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2013.09.010 · Cited by 325
Biodiversity scenarios neglect future land‐use changes
Titeux, N., Henle, K., Mihoub, J., Regos, A., Geijzendorffer, I. R., Cramer, W., Verburg, P. H., & Brotons, L. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13272 · Cited by 303
“The dialogue with and engagement of stakeholders, such as policy advisers and NGOs, within a participatory modelling framework (Voinov & Bousquet, 2010) will be key to agreeing on a set of biodiversity-oriented storylines and desirable pathways at relevant spatial and temporal scales for…”
BackgroundCollaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management
Basco‐Carrera, L., Warren, A., van Beek, E., Jonoski, A., & Giardino, A. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.014 · Cited by 296
“Many participatory modelling approaches do not have a single purpose, but rather a combination of rationales (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialMental Modeler: A Fuzzy-Logic Cognitive Mapping Modeling Tool for Adaptive Environmental Management
Gray, S. A., Gray, S., Cox, L. J., & Henly-Shepard, S. (2013) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2013.399 · Cited by 292
Gray, S. A., Gray, S., de Kok, J., Helfgott, A., O’Dwyer, B., Jordan, R., & Nyaki, A. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07396-200211 · Cited by 286
Integrated assessment and modelling: Overview and synthesis of salient dimensions
Hamilton, S. H., Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., Jakeman, A. J., & Pierce, S. A. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.005 · Cited by 299
“Integration can be achieved in these IAM phases using a mix of stakeholder participation processes and modelling tools (Jakeman and Letcher, 2003; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010); examples are given in Table 3.”
InfluentialGray, S. A., Chan, A., Clark, D., & Jordan, R. (2011) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.011 · Cited by 274
“Although data availability about these interactions are difficult to collect on the ecological and economic timescales needed to make fisheries management decisions, making stakeholder knowledge explicit through methods like the one described in this study could help resolve these issues by clearly articulating the re…”
Feng, Z., Jin, X., Chen, T., & Wu, J. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105446 · Cited by 255
Practical solutions for making models indispensable in conservation decision‐making
Addison, P., Rumpff, L., Bau, S., Carey, J. M., Chee, Y. E., Jarrad, F., McBride, M. F., & Burgman, M. A. (2013) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.12054 · Cited by 268
“…should carefully address the following three perceptions: (1) participants’ perception—that participant involvement is merely a token gesture (Voinov & Bousquet, 2010), (2) experts’ and decision-makers’ perception—’lay’ stakeholder opinions are untrustworthy and undermine the scientific…”
BackgroundAgent-Based Modelling of Social-Ecological Systems: Achievements, Challenges, and a Way Forward
Schulze, J., Müller, B. H., Groeneveld, J., & Grimm, V. (2017) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.3423 · Cited by 248
Kotir, J. H., Smith, C. S., Brown, G., Marshall, N., & Johnstone, R. W. (2016) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.081 · Cited by 244
Martín, E. G., Giordano, R., Pagano, A., van der Keur, P., & Costa, M. M. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139693 · Cited by 228
Muiderman, K., Gupta, A., Vervoort, J., & Biermann, F. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.673 · Cited by 222
“…and participatory scenario explorations—are seen as pivotal to facilitating knowledge transfer from experts to lay groups and for adapting livelihoods, institutions, and ecosystems to uncertain futures (Dougill et al., 2010; Ostrom, 2010; Tschakert & Dietrich, 2010; Voinov & Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundAgricultural production systems modelling and software: current status and future prospects
Holzworth, D. P., Snow, V., Janssen, S., Athanasiadis, I. N., Donatelli, M., Hoogenboom, G., White, J. W., & Thorburn, P. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.013 · Cited by 218
“Second, more modelling is done in a participatory setting (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010) where modellers, together with stakeholders, evaluate scenario options and develop a common understanding of the problem and the system being modelled.”
BackgroundProspects of modelling societal transitions: Position paper of an emerging community
Holtz, G., Alkemade, F., de Haan, F. J., Köhler, J., Trutnevyte, E., Luthe, T., Halbe, J., Papachristos, G., Chappin, E. J. L., Kwakkel, J. H., et al. (2015) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.006 · Cited by 244
Challenges, tasks, and opportunities in modeling agent-based complex systems
An, L., Grimm, V., Sullivan, A., Turner, B. L., Malleson, N., Heppenstall, A. J., Vincenot, C. E., Robinson, D. T., Ye, X., Liu, J., et al. (2021) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109685 · Cited by 241
“…being used to facilitate cooperation in inter – or transdisciplinary settings where they support communication and understanding across disciplines and knowledge systems of scientists and non-scientists, for example via participatory modeling (Ramanath and Gilbert, 2004; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundJayasooriya, V. M., & Ng, A. W. M. (2014) · Water Air & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-014-2055-1 · Cited by 229
“…best practices such as introducing transparent modelling procedures, determining clear objectives of the GI implementation and continuous involvement of the participants in each of the different stages of the planning process(Korfmacher, 2001, Glasbergen, 2002, Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
How to make ecological models useful for environmental management
Schuwirth, N., Borgwardt, F., Domisch, S., Friedrichs‐Manthey, M., Kattwinkel, M., Kneis, D., Kuemmerlen, M., Langhans, S. D., Martínez‐López, J., & Vermeiren, P. (2019) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108784 · Cited by 214
Walker, D. W., Śmigaj, M., & Tani, M. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1488 · Cited by 207
“…knowledge: The value of such knowledge is increasingly appreciated for ecosystems and natural resource management (Wiseman & Bardsley, 2016) and risk reduction (Van Asselt & Renn, 2011), and there are calls for its greater utilization for monitoring networks before it is lost (Alessa et al., 2016).”
BackgroundEight grand challenges in socio-environmental systems modeling
Elsawah, S., Filatova, T., Jakeman, A. J., Kettner, A. J., Zellner, M. L., Athanasiadis, I. N., Hamilton, S. H., Axtell, R. L., Brown, D. G., Gilligan, J. M., et al. (2020) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling · doi:10.18174/sesmo.2020a16226 · Cited by 205
“Most SES modeling steps need expert and/or stakeholder engagement and evaluation, for which there is now much guidance regarding the why and how (e.g. Bert et al., 2014; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010; Walker et al., 2003; Zellner et al., 2012).”
BackgroundJakku, E., & Thorburn, P. J. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.08.007 · Cited by 204
“So, application of our framework helps expand the definition of ‘success’ in participatory DSS development in agriculture, closer to that common in stakeholder-based environmental modelling (Pahl-Wostl et al., 2007; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodComputational Modelling of Public Policy: Reflections on Practice
Gilbert, N., Ahrweiler, P., Barbrook-Johnson, P., Narasimhan, K. P., & Wilkinson, H. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.3669 · Cited by 199
Preparing for an interdisciplinary future: A perspective from early-career researchers
Bridle, H. L., Vrieling, A., Cardillo, M., Araya, Y., & Hinojosa, L. (2013) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.09.003 · Cited by 198
“problems and to develop models [19], but also actively participate in data collection and scientific experiments [20].”
BackgroundCoproducing Flood Risk Knowledge: Redistributing Expertise in Critical ‘Participatory Modelling’
Landström, C., Whatmore, S. J., Lane, S. N., Odoni, N. A., Ward, N., & Bradley, S. (2011) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a43482 · Cited by 198
“In PM, modellers parameterise the options suggested by stakeholders and run models to create scenarios, the focus being on presenting the outputs of models in the participatory forum (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
Simple or complicated agent-based models? A complicated issue
Sun, Z., Lorscheid, I., Millington, J. D. A., Lauf, S., Magliocca, N. R., Groeneveld, J., Balbi, S., Nolzen, H., Müller, B. H., Schulze, J., et al. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.006 · Cited by 196
“On the one hand, stakeholders need to understand the model sufficiently (e.g., through transparent model design; see above), which demands simple models (Sohl and Claggett, 2013; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundCosenz, F., Rodrigues, V. P., & Rosati, F. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2395 · Cited by 191
“To do this, collaborative modeling approaches are proved to be effective methods for an active stakeholder engagement (Rouwette, 2011; Voinov & Bousquet, 2010).”
Henly-Shepard, S., Gray, S., & Cox, L. J. (2014) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.004 · Cited by 190
Participatory flood vulnerability assessment: a multi-criteria approach
de Brito, M. M., Evers, M., & Almoradie, A. D. S. (2018) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-22-373-2018 · Cited by 183
“However, participation and cooperation are key aspects for bridging the gap between modellers and end users and eventually between science and policy (Barthel et al., 2015; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. M. (2021) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1 · Cited by 183
“While the notion of socio-scientific models has not been explored much in the field of science education, this multidisciplinary modeling approach (which we contend is analogous to “causal loop diagrams” or “system diagrams”) has been applied and studied in many other disciplines (Buchholz et al., 2007; Fairweather, 2…”
MethodPagano, A., Pluchinotta, I., Pengal, P., Cokan, B., & Giordano, R. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.059 · Cited by 170
“Stakeholders participate to some degree in different stages of the process, including problem definition, system description, identification of policy levers, model development and/or policy analysis (Voinov et al., 2016; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundBarbrook-Johnson, P., & Penn, A. S. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-01919-7 · Cited by 182
Regime shifts in coupled socio-environmental systems: Review of modelling challenges and approaches
Filatova, T., Polhill, G. J., & van Ewijk, S. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.04.003 · Cited by 182
“Early engagement of stake-holders in the design and exploration of models applied to study potential regime shifts is essential for the acceptance of models' results, including exploration of policy options' impacts (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundButler, C., & Adamowski, J. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.010 · Cited by 164
“Within this method, the group learning and experience sharing between stakeholders throughout the process is more heavily valued than other PMB processes (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
InfluentialImproving ecosystem service frameworks to address wicked problems
Davies, K. K., Fisher, K., Dickson, M. E., Thrush, S. F., & Heron, R. L. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07581-200237 · Cited by 176
How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods
Berthet, E. T. A., Barnaud, C., Girard, N., Labatut, J., & Martin, G. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627 · Cited by 159
“For example, participatory modelling techniques are increasingly used to promote social learning and to integrate different types of knowledge and values in decision-making (Voinov and Bousquet 2010; Ginger 2013).”
MethodImplementing Participatory Water Management: Recent Advances in Theory, Practice, and Evaluation
von Korff, Y., Daniell, K. A., Moellenkamp, S., Bots, P. W. G., & Bijlsma, R. M. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-04733-170130 · Cited by 180
Boundary matters: the potential of system dynamics to support sustainability?
Nabavi, E., Daniell, K. A., & Najafi, H. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.032 · Cited by 170
Methods for translating narrative scenarios into quantitative assessments of land use change
Mallampalli, V. R., Mavrommati, G., Thompson, J. R., Duveneck, M. J., Meyer, S. R., Ligmann-Zielińska, A., Druschke, C. G., Hychka, K. C., Kenney, M. A., Kok, K. I., et al. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.011 · Cited by 160
“Modelers who plan to engage stakeholders in scenario translation ought to take the time to learn from existing best practices in participatory modeling, including flexibility, temporal and spatial openness, and transparency (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundIntegrating Systems Science and Community-Based Participatory Research to Achieve Health Equity
Frerichs, L., Lich, K. H., Dave, G., & Corbie-Smith, G. M. (2015) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2015.302944 · Cited by 164
Farming system design for innovative crop-livestock integration in Europe
Moraine, M., Duru, M., Nicholas, P., Leterme, P., & Therond, O. (2014) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731114001189 · Cited by 152
“The main limitation of such design approaches is that the problems and questions are most often predetermined and do not really consider social context or non-scientific knowledge (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundMoraine, M., Duru, M., & Thérond, O. (2016) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170515000526 · Cited by 152
“design process to decipher this complexity (Steyaert and Jiggins, 2007; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
The added value of participatory modelling in fisheries management – what has been learnt?
Röckmann, C., Ulrich, C., Dreyer, M., Bell, E., Borodzicz, E. P., Haapasaari, P., Hauge, K. H., Howell, D., Mäntyniemi, S., Miller, D., et al. (2012) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.027 · Cited by 159
“Dreyer and Renn [29] highlight four purposes of participatory modelling in the context of natural resource governance [20,22,30–32]: (A) Collective learning for consensus-building and/or conflict reduction; (B) knowledge incorporation and quality control for better management decisions; (C) higher levels of legitimacy…”
BackgroundSun, Z., & Müller, D. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.06.007 · Cited by 161
“Contrary to many other simulation models, stakeholders can be more readily involved in model and scenario development, which eases their skepticism towards the modeling exercise (Gilbert et al., 2002; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
BackgroundWater Governance, Stakeholder Engagement, and Sustainable Water Resources Management
Megdal, S. B., Eden, S., & Shamir, E. (2017) · Water · doi:10.3390/w9030190 · Cited by 150
“Stakeholder engagement in modeling has been used in many instances and has been successful in creating a shared knowledge base [13].”
MethodModel-based policymaking or policy-based modelling? How energy models and energy policy interact
Süsser, D., Ceglarz, A., Gaschnig, H., Stavrakas, V., Flamos, A., Giannakidis, G., & Lilliestam, J. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101984 · Cited by 149
A general framework for Dynamic Emulation Modelling in environmental problems
Castelletti, A. F., Galelli, S., Ratto, M., Soncini‐Sessa, R., & Young, P. C. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.002 · Cited by 150
Decision support models in climate policy
Doukas, H., & Νίκας, Α. (2019) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.017 · Cited by 146
Farming system design to feed the changing world. A review
Martin, G., Martin‐Clouaire, R., & Duru, M. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0075-4 · Cited by 144
“One of the main limitations of this kind of approach is that the development of innovations depends on the social relations between the operators and their ability to communicate and share knowledge (Voinov and Bousquet 2010).”
BackgroundEvaluating integrated assessment models of global climate change
Schwanitz, V. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.005 · Cited by 134
“Inspiration for participatory approaches can be found in Voinov and Bousquet (2010); White et al. (2010).”
BackgroundMarcucci, E., Pira, M. L., Gatta, V., Inturri, G., Ignaccolo, M., & Pluchino, A. (2017) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2017.04.006 · Cited by 146
“…citizens, (5) validation of the main elements of the model via observations or involving stakeholders in a participatory modeling approach (see e.g. Voinov and Bousquet, 2010; Anand et al., 2016), (6) general relaxation of model assumptions considering, for example, different power between…”
BackgroundLawrence, J., Bell, R. G., Blackett, P., Stephens, S. A., & Allan, S. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.012 · Cited by 141
Badham, J., Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., Hamilton, S. H., Hunt, R. J., Jakeman, A. J., Pierce, S. A., Snow, V. O., Babbar‐Sebens, M., Fu, B., et al. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013 · Cited by 135
“2018), engaging stakeholders (Vennix et al. 1990; Voinov and Bousquet 2010; Voinov et al. 2018), and general modeling (Banks 1999).”
BackgroundElsawah, S., Hamilton, S. H., Jakeman, A. J., Rothman, D. S., Schweizer, V. J., Trutnevyte, E., Carlsen, H., Drakes, C., Frame, B., Fu, B., et al. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138393 · Cited by 145
Agent-based modelling and flood risk management: A compendious literature review
Zhuo, L., & Han, D. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125600 · Cited by 126
Stakeholder driven update and improvement of a national water resources model
Højberg, A. L., Troldborg, L., Stisen, S., Christensen, B. B. S., & Henriksen, H. J. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.010 · Cited by 124
Participatory land use modelling, pathways to an integrated approach
Hewitt, R. J., van Delden, H., & Escobar, F. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.019 · Cited by 124
“Voinov and Bousquet (2010) find early examples of participation in modelling in the work of Forrester (e.g. 1961) and also in environmental assessment from the 1970s (Wagner and Ortolando 1975, 1976).”
BackgroundPira, M. L., Marcucci, E., Gatta, V., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., & Pluchino, A. (2017) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1007/s12544-017-0268-2 · Cited by 132
“It is convincingly argued that better decisions are implemented with less conflict and more success when they are stakeholder-driven [8].”
BackgroundDeveloping successful environmental decision support systems: Challenges and best practices
Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110513 · Cited by 136
Gray, S., Voinov, A., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., BenDor, T., Bommel, P., Glynn, P., Hedelin, B., Hubacek, K., Introne, J., et al. (2018) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1627 · Cited by 106
“Indeed, although recent reviews have indicated that learning is a core benefit of PM (Voinov and Bousquet 2010), which is also supported by the studies presented here, formal evaluations of learning among researchers, managers, and stakeholders involved remains extremely limited (Gray et al. 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationWhy are decisions in flood disaster management so poorly supported by information from flood models?
Leskens, J. G., Brugnach, M., Hoekstra, A. Y., & Schuurmans, W. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.11.003 · Cited by 130
“The application of one of the methods proposed, direct involvement of decision-makers in the computation of flood predictions (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010), will only work if technical limitations of models are overcome in terms of computation time and flexibility to adapt models to actual…”
BackgroundMethodTowards adaptive and integrated management paradigms to meet the challenges of water governance
Halbe, J., Pahl‐Wostl, C., Sendzimir, J., & Adamowski, J. (2013) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2013.146 · Cited by 118
Mental models for conservation research and practice
Moon, K., Guerrero, A. M., Adams, V. M., Biggs, D., Blackman, D. A., Craven, L. K., Dickinson, H., & Ross, H. (2019) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12642 · Cited by 117
How Ecosystem Services Knowledge and Values Influence Farmers' Decision-Making
Lamarque, P., Meyfroidt, P., Nettier, B., & Lavorel, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107572 · Cited by 117
“Participatory simulation, of which role-playing game constitute one tool, is a very useful approach in decision-making processes in complex systems [54,55].”
BackgroundGray, S., Gagnon, A. S., Gray, S. A., O’Dwyer, B., O’Mahony, C., Muir, D., Devoy, R. J. N., Falaleeva, M., & Gault, J. (2013) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.11.008 · Cited by 115
Strategic directions for agent-based modeling: avoiding the YAAWN syndrome
O’Sullivan, D., Evans, T. P., Manson, S. M., Metcalf, S. S., Ligmann-Zielińska, A., & Bone, C. E. (2015) · Journal of Land Use Science · doi:10.1080/1747423x.2015.1030463 · Cited by 114
“Considering the purpose of models brings us naturally to the last major issue raised, the question of how ABMs (or simulation models more generally) can be used to connect with land-change stakeholders beyond the scientific community (Voinov & Bousquet, 2010).”
InfluentialPrioritizing investments for climate-smart agriculture: Lessons learned from Mali
Andrieu, N., Sogoba, B., Zougmoré, R. B., Howland, F., Samaké, O. B., Bonilla-Findji, O., Lizarazo, M., Nowak, A. C., Dembélé, C., & Corner-Dolloff, C. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.02.008 · Cited by 112
Bert, F., Podestá, G., Rovere, S. L., Menéndez, Á. N., NORTH, M. J., Tatara, E. R., Laciana, C. E., Weber, E. U., & Toranzo, F. R. (2011) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.08.007 · Cited by 112
Characteristics of bioeconomy systems and sustainability issues at the territorial scale. A review
Wohlfahrt, J., Ferchaud, F., Gabrielle, B., Godard, C., Kurek, B., Loyce, C., & Thérond, O. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.385 · Cited by 111
Stakeholder engagement in water governance as social learning: lessons from practice
Wehn, U., Collins, K., Anema, K., Basco‐Carrera, L., & Lerebours, A. (2017) · Water International · doi:10.1080/02508060.2018.1403083 · Cited by 113
Combining participatory modelling and citizen science to support volunteer conservation action
Gray, S. A., Jordan, R., Crall, A., Newman, G., Hmelo‐Silver, C. E., Huang, J., Novak, W. E., Mellor, D. T., Frensley, B. T., Prysby, M., et al. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.037 · Cited by 107
Integrating modelling and smart sensors for environmental and human health
Reis, S., Seto, E., Northcross, A., Quinn, N. W. T., Convertino, M., Jones, R. L., Maier, H. R., Schlink, U., Steinle, S., Vieno, M., et al. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.06.003 · Cited by 114
“…so tightly couple real-time sensor data with models, that they produce information that actively engages with the public and informs stakeholders (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010; Boschetti, 2015) towards improving public health in a seamless and transparent manner e true ubiquitous sensing and…”
BackgroundLinking Complexity and Sustainability Theories: Implications for Modeling Sustainability Transitions
Peter, C., & Swilling, M. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6031594 · Cited by 120
“Most importantly, the modeling framework must support and facilitate the creation of a “shared understanding” of the complexities of transitions to sustainability through enabling participation [10–13].”
BackgroundOliver, D. M., Fish, R. D., Winter, M., Hodgson, C. J., Heathwaite, A. L., & Chadwick, D. R. (2011) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.013 · Cited by 103
Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction
Voinov, A. A., Seppelt, R., Reis, S., Nabel, J. E. M. S., & Shokravi, S. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.005 · Cited by 113
“On the other hand, participatory modelling (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010; Van Asselt et al., 2003) tries to focus on the modelling process rather than the model itself (Fig.”
Self-citationBayesian belief networks to analyse trade-offs among ecosystem services at the regional scale
Landuyt, D., Broekx, S., & Goethals, P. L. M. (2016) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.015 · Cited by 102
Sanders, B. F., Schubert, J. E., Goodrich, K. A., Houston, D., FELDMAN, D. L., Basolo, V., Luke, A., Boudreau, D., Karlin, B., Cheung, W., et al. (2019) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2019ef001391 · Cited by 100
“…and meeting end ‐ user fl ood mapping needs through participatory processes (Hagemeier ‐ Klose & Wagner, 2009; Martini & Loat, 2007; Meyer et al., 2012; Voinov & Bousquet, 2010; DeLorme et al., 2016) and re fl ect the varying needs of different end ‐ users for different types of information, as…”
Bakhanova, E., Garcia, J. A., Raffe, W. L., & Voinov, A. A. (2020) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104846 · Cited by 116
Self-citationSahraoui, Y., Leski, C. D. G., Benot, M., Revers, F., Salles, D., van Halder, I., Barneix, M., & Carassou, L. (2021) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104039 · Cited by 102
Le, Q. B., Seidl, R., & Scholz, R. W. (2011) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.002 · Cited by 101
Meensel, J. V., Lauwers, L., Kempen, I., Dessein, J., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.002 · Cited by 101
Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: Results of an experiment
Arciniegas, G., Janssen, R., & Rietveld, P. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.021 · Cited by 101
When do aquatic systems models provide useful predictions, what is changing, and what is next?
Robson, B. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.009 · Cited by 100
An evolving research agenda for human–coastal systems
Lazarus, E. D., Ellis, M. A., Murray, A. B., & Hall, D. M. (2015) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.043 · Cited by 108
“…created and retained by individual 539 stakeholders and networks and communities of stakeholders (Ames, 2004; St. 540 Martin and Hall-Arber, 2008; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010) will help scientists and 541 publics alike explain and anticipate physical and social impacts of, and responses 542 to,…”
BackgroundBednarska-Olejniczak, D., Olejniczak, J., & Svobodová, L. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11020332 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Voinov, A., & Bousquet, F.
- Affiliations
- International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Voinov, Alexey
- ORCID
- Voinov, Alexey
- Venue
- Environmental Modelling & Software
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1268-1281
- ISSN
- 1364-8152 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127470579
- Cited by
- 1,354
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 64
- FWCI
- 194.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Modelling & Software (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Keywords
- stakeholder engagement, participatory modeling, cooperative learning, environmental assessment, decision support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
