Cited by 15Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesStress Responses and Cortisol

Repeated cortisol administration does not reduce intrusive memories - A double blind placebo controlled experimental study

Graebener, Alexandra Heike, Michael, Tanja, Holz, Elena, Lass-Hennemann, Johanna·2017·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

PTSD is a severe mental disorder, which may develop after exposure to traumatic events and is characterized by intrusive memories. Intrusions are sudden brief sensory memories of the traumatic event, that cause immense distress and impairment in every day functioning. Thus, the reduction of intrusive memories is one of the main aims of PTSD therapy. Recently, the glucocorticoid cortisol has been proposed as a pharmacological option to reduce intrusive memories, because cortisol is known to have memory retrieval inhibiting effects. However, the research on the effects of cortisol administration on intrusive memories is not conclusive. The aim of the present study was to examine if repeated cortisol administration inhibits intrusions and recognition memory in an experimental study using the trauma film paradigm. In a randomized double-blind placebo controlled design participants were exposed to a traumatic film (known to induce intrusions in healthy participants) and received either a low dose of cortisol (20mg) or placebo on the three days following "trauma exposure". Intrusive memories were assessed with an Electronic Diary and an Intrusion Triggering Task. Furthermore, we assessed explicit memory for the traumatic film clip with a recognition test. Contrary to our predictions, the cortisol group did not report fewer intrusions than the placebo group nor did it show diminished performance on the recognition test. Our results show that sole cortisol administration after a traumatic experience cannot reduce intrusive re-experiencing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.09.001

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graebener, A. H., Michael, T., Holz, E., & Lass-Hennemann, J.
Affiliations
Saarland University (DE)
Corresponding author
Michael, Tanja
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
1132-1143
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756109794
Cited by
15
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
German Research Foundation (1457)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
cortisol, intrusive memories, post-traumatic stress disorder, glucocorticoids, recognition memory, trauma film paradigm, re-experiencing
MeSH terms
Psychological Trauma, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Depression, Double-Blind Method, Electrocardiography, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Memory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Saliva, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult, Visual Analog Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review