Cited by 22Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Serum anti-PDIK1L autoantibody as a novel marker for endometriosis

Open access
Nabeta, Motowo, Abe, Yasuhito, Haraguchi, Ryuma, Kito, Katsumi, Kusanagi, Yasuki, Ito, Masaharu·2010·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To establish a novel serum marker for endometriosis, serum autoantibodies (autoAbs) were investigated using a proteomic approach.Design Retrospective study.Setting Departments of Molecular Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology in Ehime University and University Hospital.Patient(s) Sixty-nine patients with endometriosis, 38 disease control patients without endometriosis, and 44 healthy volunteers.Intervention(s) Autoantibodies in sera of endometriotic patients and healthy controls were investigated using a human fibroblast cell line, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and Western blotting. Proteins in reacted spots were identified using MALDI time of flight mass spectrometry with MASCOT analysis. ELISAs were established using recombinant proteins, and autoAb-titers were estimated in sera of endometriotic patients and controls.Main outcome measure(s) Identification of serum autoAb useful for diagnosis of endometriosis.Result(s) Several autoAbs were identified. ELISAs were established and serum autoAb titers were estimated. Among those identified, anti-PDIK1L-autoAb levels were significantly elevated in endometriotic patients. Sensitivity (59.4%) and accuracy (72.8%) of serum anti-PDIK1L-autoAb assay were better than those of serum CA125 levels (36.2% and 62.9%, respectively) in diagnosis of endometriosis. Additionally, anti-PDIK1L-autoAb could detect endometriotic patients in early stages.Conclusion(s) Serum anti-PDIK1L-autoAb can be a new serum marker for the diagnosis of endometriosis. This study validates further clinical evaluation of this novel marker.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.008

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serum anti-PDIK1L and anti-syntaxin 5 autoantibodies were reported elevated in endometriosis patients.

    “Additionally, serum anti-PDIK1L [77] and anti-syntaxin 5 autoantibodies [78] were reported elevated in endometriosis patients.”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [77]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ozkan S, Murk W, Arici A. Endometriosis and infer- tility: epidemiology and evidence-based treatments. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008;1127:92-100.
  2. Audebert A. Endometriosis coaching. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2006;34:329-36.
  3. Bast RJ, Xu F, Yu Y, Barnhill S, Zhang Z, Mill G. CA125: the past and the future. Int J Biol Markers 1998;13:179-87.
  4. Chen F, Song Y, Lee N, Lo S. The use of serum CA125 as a marker for endometriosis in patient with dysmenorrhea for monitoring therapy and for re- currence of endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77:665-70.
  5. Matarese G, De Placido G, Nikas Y, Alviggi C. Path- ogenesis of endometriosis: natural immunity dys- function or autoimmune disease? Trends Mol Med 2003;9:223-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nabeta, M., Abe, Y., Haraguchi, R., Kito, K., Kusanagi, Y., & Ito, M.
Affiliations
Ehime University (JP)
Corresponding author
Abe, Yasuhito
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
94
Issue
7
Pages
2552-2557.e1
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144434711
Cited by
22
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
endometriosis, serum autoantibodies, serum biomarkers, endometriosis diagnosis, CA125
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autoantibodies, Carcinoma, Cells, Cultured, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Leiomyoma, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Uterine Diseases, Uterine Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review