Cited by 26Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

Experimental pain tolerance is decreased and independent of clinical pain intensity in patients with endometriosis

Open access
van Aken, Mieke, Oosterman, Joukje, van Rijn, Tineke, Woudsma, Kelly, Ferdek, Magdalena, Ruigt, Gé, Kozicz, Tamas, Braat, Didi +2 more·2018·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To investigate alterations in tactile, pain thresholds and pain tolerance thresholds in patients with endometriosis using a multimodality approach.Design Cross-sectional study.Setting Multidisciplinary referral center.Patient(s) Women with proven endometriosis (N = 35) and healthy controls (N = 38).Intervention(s) Pain processing was tested using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to investigate sensation, pain, and pain tolerance thresholds for thermal, electrical, and pressure stimuli.Main outcome measure(s) Differences in QST measures in patients with endometriosis and in healthy controls on the endometriosis site and control sites, and the association between QST outcomes and patient characteristics.Result(s) We observed a significantly decreased pain tolerance in patients with endometriosis, independent of clinical pain intensity or revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage, compared with healthy controls.Conclusion(s) Increasing knowledge concerning mechanisms underlying the pain of women with endometriosis creates opportunities to develop new treatment options. More attention should be paid not only to treat endometriosis in a surgical or pharmacologic way, but also to desensitize by pain education or cognitive therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.040

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pain sensitivity is higher among women with endometriosis than in healthy controls.

    “Pain sensitivity is higher among women with endometriosis than in healthy controls.51,52”

    From Prenatal Origins of Endometriosis Pathology and Pain: Reviewing the Evidence of a Role for Low Testosterone (2023) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Results (p. 2; QST: Pressure Stimulation and Electrical Stimulation, p. 5) report lower experimental pain tolerance in women with endometriosis than in healthy controls. But pain-detection thresholds did not differ, so the broader statement that pain sensitivity was higher is supported only for the tolerance measure. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pain sensitivity is higher among women than men.

    “For example, pain sensitivity is higher among women than men.51,52”

    From Prenatal Origins of Endometriosis Pathology and Pain: Reviewing the Evidence of a Role for Low Testosterone (2023) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Discussion (p. 7) describes a comparison between women with and without endometriosis, not between women and men. Searches for sex differences and male–female pain thresholds found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Aken, M., Oosterman, J., van Rijn, T., Woudsma, K., Ferdek, M., Ruigt, G., Kozicz, T., Braat, D., Peeters, A., & Nap, A.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Rijnstate Hospital (NL)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
110
Issue
6
Pages
1118-1128
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898908320
Cited by
26
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Carleton University (ECSW2014-2411-275)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
endometriosis, pain tolerance, pain threshold, quantitative sensory testing, tactile perception, thermal pain, electrical pain, pressure pain, pain processing, endometriosis-associated pain, pain education, cognitive therapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Pain Threshold, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review