Cited by 337Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsAgricultural and Food Production Studies

Nutrition, agriculture and the global food system in low and middle income countries

Open access
Popkin, Barry M.·2014·Food Policy

Abstract

The entire food value chain and diet of low and middle income countries (LMICs) are rapidly shifting. Many of the issues addressed by the nutrition community ignore some of the major underlying shifts in purchases of consumer packaged foods and beverages. At the same time, the drivers of the food system at the farm level might be changing. There is a need for the agriculture and nutrition communities to understand these changes and focus on some of their implications for health. This rapid growth of the retail sector will change the diets of the food insecure as much as that of the food secure across rural and urban LMIC's. This short commentary contents that current research, programs and policies are ignoring these rapid dynamic shifts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.05.001

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wartella EA Lichtenstein AH Boon CS Examination of front-of-package nutrition rating systems and symbols: Phase 1 Report, Committee on Examination of Front-of- Package Nutrition Ratings Systems and Symbols 2010 140 Institute of Medicine National Academy Press Washington DC 24983042

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popkin, B. M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Popkin, Barry M.
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
47
Pages
91-96
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093776283
Cited by
337
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 3
FWCI
48.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • NIH (R01-HD30880, DK056350, R01-HD38700)
  • Carolina Population Center (R24 HD050924)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
nutrition, agriculture, global food system, low- and middle-income countries, food value chains, dietary change, beverages, food insecurity, retail sector growth, urban-rural differences, health implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review