The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sugar reduction in probiotic chocolate-flavored milk: Impact on dynamic sensory profile and liking
Abstract
Reducing the sugar content of processed products has been claimed to be one of the most efficient strategies for decreasing sugar intake. The present work aimed at studying the influence of sugar reduction on the dynamic sensory profile and consumers' liking of probiotic chocolate-flavored milks using a novel temporal methodology, and to evaluate two alternatives (vanilla flavor and thaumatin) to attenuate the sensory changes caused by sugar reduction. Probiotic chocolate-flavored milks were formulated with different reductions in added sugar (0, 20, 40 and 60%). Vanilla flavor and thaumatin were added to the sugar-reduced samples at two concentrations. Samples were evaluated by trained assessors using Temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA). Additionally, consumers evaluated the dynamic sensory profile of a subset of the samples using TCATA and indicated their overall liking using a 9-point hedonic scale. Results from the present work showed that the main effect of sugar reduction on the dynamic sensory profile of the probiotic chocolate-flavored milks was related to changes in sweetness, bitterness and thickness. A reduction in added sugar of 20% led to changes in sweetness intensity, which were perceived by both trained assessors and consumers. However, consumers' liking was not significantly affected by sugar reduction up to 40%. The addition of vanilla flavor at suprathreshold concentrations was not efficient in increasing sweetness perception in chocolate-flavored milks with the lowest sugar reduction percentage, suggesting that it may not be a feasible alternative for reducing sugar in this product category. These results suggest that in many situations sugar content of food products could be decreased without a relevant impact on consumers' sensory and hedonic perception.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While not all studies have shown bigger e ects at lower rather than higher sucrose concentrations [44], most studies have [45,104,105].”
From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [105]
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices
Lawless, H. T., & Heymann, H. (2010) · Food Science Text Series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5 · Cited by 4,815
Comparing Individual Means in the Analysis of Variance
Tukey, J. W. (1949) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001913 · Cited by 4,302
DEVELOPMENT OF FOOD PREFERENCES
Birch, L. L. (1999) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.41 · Cited by 1,757
Sensory evaluation of food—Principles and practices 1998
KILCAST, D. (1998) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(98)00004-4 · Cited by 1,716
Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition
Caballero, B. H., Trugo, L. C., & Finglas, P. M. (2003) · Academic eBooks · Cited by 1,639
Te Morenga, L., Mallard, S., & Mann, J. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e7492 · Cited by 1,629
Encyclopedia of analytical science
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0032 · Cited by 916
Lustig, R. H., Schmidt, L. A., & Brindis, C. D. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/482027a · Cited by 793
Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity
Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, A., Rogeaux, M., Étiévant, P. X., & Köster, E. P. (2009) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.04.005 · Cited by 727
Correspondence Analysis inR, with Two- and Three-dimensional Graphics: ThecaPackage
Nenadić, O., & Greenacre, M. J. (2007) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v020.i03 · Cited by 668
Guarner, F. (1998) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(97)00136-0 · Cited by 638
The impact of perceptual interactions on perceived flavor
Delwiche, J. (2004) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(03)00041-7 · Cited by 563
Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling
Varela, P., & Ares, G. (2014) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16853 · Cited by 438
Self-citationTemporal Check-All-That-Apply (TCATA): A novel dynamic method for characterizing products
Castura, J. C., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., & Ares, G. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.017 · Cited by 309
Self-citationAPPLICATION OF A CHECK‐ALL‐THAT‐APPLY QUESTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHOCOLATE MILK DESSERTS
Ares, G., Barreiro, C., Deliza, R., Giménez, A., & Gámbaro, A. (2010) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.2010.00290.x · Cited by 296
Self-citationGower, J. C., Gardner‐Lubbe, S., & le Roux, N. J. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470973196 · Cited by 277
Bacteria and chocolate: A successful combination for probiotic delivery
Possemiers, S., Marzorati, M., Verstraete, W., & de Wiele, T. V. (2010) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.008 · Cited by 217
Stein, L. J., Nagai, H., Nakagawa, M., & Beauchamp, G. K. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(02)00173-3 · Cited by 194
Effects of color and odor on judgments of sweetness among children and adults
Lavin, J. G., & Lawless, H. T. (1998) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(98)00009-3 · Cited by 166
Ares, G., Giménez, A., Barreiro, C., & Gámbaro, A. (2009) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.05.006 · Cited by 162
Self-citationSensory evaluation techniques — Make “good for you” taste “good”
Civille, G. V., & Oftedal, K. N. (2012) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.015 · Cited by 151
Repeatability in hedonic sensory measurement: a conceptual exploration
Köster, E. P., Couronné, T., Léon, F., Lévy, C., & Marcelino, A.-S. (2003) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00075-7 · Cited by 122
Encyclopedia of Human Nutrition
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5352 · Cited by 121
Impact of sensory differences on consumer acceptability of yoghurt and yoghurt-like products
Bayarri, S., Carbonell, I., Barrios, E. X., & Costell, E. (2011) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2010.09.002 · Cited by 113
Linton, O. B. (2010) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230280816_12 · Cited by 110
Application of multiple-sip temporal dominance of sensations to the evaluation of sweeteners
Zorn, S., Alcaire, F., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., & Ares, G. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.04.003 · Cited by 109
Self-citationLahtinen, S. J., Ouwehand, A. C., Salminen, S., Forssell, P., & Myllärinen, P. (2007) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-765x.2007.02110.x · Cited by 107
Subthreshold olfactory stimulation can enhance sweetness
Labbe, D., Rytz, A., Morgenegg, C., Ali, S., & Martin, N. (2007) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl040 · Cited by 105
Thompson, J. L., Lopetcharat, K., & Drake, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0313 · Cited by 97
Bank, A. D. (2017) · ADB economics working paper series · doi:10.22617/2313-6537 · Cited by 95
Acceptance of sugar reduction in flavored yogurt
Chollet, M., Gille, D., Schmid, A., Walther, B., & Piccinali, P. (2013) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-6610 · Cited by 93
Action on sugar—lessons from UK salt reduction programme
MacGregor, G. A., & Hashem, K. M. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60200-2 · Cited by 84
How can aroma-related cross-modal interactions be analysed? A review of current methodologies
Poinot, P., Arvisenet, G., Ledauphin, J., Gaillard, J.-L., & Prost, C. (2013) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.10.007 · Cited by 81
The impact of sugar and fat reduction on perception and liking of biscuits
Biguzzi, C., Schlich, P., & Langé, C. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.02.001 · Cited by 81
LeBar, M. (2004) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0279-0750.2004.00194.x · Cited by 81
Check-All-That-Apply Questions
Varela, P., & Ares, G. (2014) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16853-16 · Cited by 76
Self-citationSweet and taste-modifying proteins: A review
Gibbs, B. F., Alli, I., & Mulligan, C. N. (1996) · Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/0271-5317(96)00175-3 · Cited by 75
Grygorczyk, A., Lesschaeve, I., Corredig, M., & Duizer, L. M. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.02.017 · Cited by 68
How Sweet It Is: Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Obesity, and Cardiovascular Risk in Childhood
Kavey, R.-E. W. (2010) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2010.07.028 · Cited by 68
Comparison of methods to monitor liking of food during consumption
Sudre, J., Pineau, N., Loret, C., & Martin, N. (2011) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.10.013 · Cited by 67
Paixão, J. A., Rodrigues, J. B., Esmerino, E. A., da Cruz, A. G., & Bolini, H. M. A. (2014) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2014-7995 · Cited by 60
Odour-modulation of taste ratings by chefs
Boakes, R. A., & Hemberger, H. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.01.006 · Cited by 55
Mortazavian, A. M., Ehsani, M. R., & Sohrabvandi, S. (2007) · Milk science international/Milchwissenschaft · Cited by 50
Ideal and relative sweetness of high intensity sweeteners in mango nectar
Cadena, R. S., & Bolini, H. M. A. (2012) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02932.x · Cited by 48
de Souza, V. R., Pinheiro, A. C. M., Carneiro, J. D. D. S., Pinto, S. M., de Abreu, L. R., & Menezes, C. C. (2011) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.2011.00349.x · Cited by 38
Selected Topics in the Chemistry of Natural Products
(2007) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789812790781 · Cited by 36
Functional Foods: Health Effects and Clinical Applications
Galland, L. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-375083-9.00130-6 · Cited by 34
Labbe, D., & Martin, N. (2009) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjp045 · Cited by 30
Yebra-Biurrun, M. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-12-369397-7/00610-5 · Cited by 26
Dynamic Sensory Descriptive Methodologies: Time–Intensity and Temporal Dominance of Sensations
Varela, P., & Ares, G. (2014) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16853-18 · Cited by 20
Self-citationPOPA, D., & Ustunol, Z. (2011) · International Journal of Dairy Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0307.2011.00694.x · Cited by 18
Tying up the loose ends in simple correspondence analysisPreprint
Greenacre, M. J. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 16
Hagiwara, A., Yoshino, H., Sano, M. E. B., Kawabe, M., Tamano, S., Sakaue, K., Nakamura, M., Tada, M., Imaida, K., & Shirai, T. (2005) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2005.04.001 · Cited by 15
Koivistoinen, P., & Hyvönen, L. E. T. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 11
Sucrose: Dietary Sucrose and Disease
Caballero, B. H. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-375083-9.00257-9 · Cited by 10
RECENT TRENDS OF SOME NATURAL SWEET SUBSTANCES FROM PLANTS
Crammer, B. (2007) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789812790781_0007 · Cited by 9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Q. J., Mielby, L. A., Junge, J. Y., Bertelsen, A. S., Kidmose, U., Spence, C., & Byrne, D. V. (2019) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods8060211 · Cited by 168
“While not all studies have shown bigger effects at lower rather than higher sucrose concentrations [43], most studies have [44,103,104].”
ResultŚwiąder, K., & Marczewska, M. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10020446 · Cited by 163
Temporal Dominance of Sensations (TDS): a new deal for temporal sensory analysis
Schlich, P. (2017) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2017.05.003 · Cited by 155
Sugar reduction without compromising sensory perception. An impossible dream?
Hutchings, S. C., Low, J. Y. Q., & Keast, R. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2018.1450214 · Cited by 149
Invited review: Sugar reduction in dairy products
Keefer, H. R. M., Kaliappan, S., & Drake, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-14347 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliveira, D., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Castura, J. C., Deliza, R., & Ares, G.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
- Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Ares, Gastón
- Venue
- Food Research International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 75
- Pages
- 148-156
- ISSN
- 0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W803331712
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 14.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Research International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Científica
- CAPES-Brasil
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
- Keywords
- sugar reduction, consumer liking, temporal check-all-that-apply, sweetness perception, bitterness, texture, vanilla flavor, thaumatin, artificial sweeteners
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review