Cited by 29Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Changes in positive affect in cognitive-behavioral treatment of anxiety disorders

Open access
Wilner Tirpak, Julianne, Cassiello-Robbins, Clair, Ametaj, Amantia, Olesnycky, Olenka S., Sauer-Zavala, Shannon, Farchione, Todd J., Barlow, David H.·2019·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This study evaluated changes in positive affect within cognitive-behavioral treatments (CBT) for anxiety disorders. It was hypothesized that there would be significantly greater increases in positive affect in CBT conditions compared to the waitlist, and particularly higher in the Unified Protocol (UP) than the single disorder protocols (SDP) given the UP's focus on emotions (including positive emotions) rather than symptoms.Method Patients with heterogeneous anxiety disorders (N = 223) were randomly assigned to the UP, SDP or waitlist. Linear mixed model regression (intent to treat) analyses were used to compare change in positive affect, quality of life, and savoring between patients in the treatment conditions (UP and SDP) versus waitlist conditions. Between condition effect sizes were calculated to assess the magnitude of difference within conditions at post-treatment.Results Results indicated a significant Group (treatment vs. waitlist) × Time (pre- post-treatment) interaction (F(1, 154.36) = 6.75; p = .01) for positive affect in which the treatment group showed significant improvements in positive affect pre- to post-treatment (ESsg = 0.37, SEsg = 0.09, 95% CI [0.20: 0.54]) and the waitlist condition did not. There were no differences between UP and SDP conditions in positive affect at baseline or at post-treatment.Conclusions These results suggest CBT, which typically focuses on reductions in negative affect, may also improve positive affect. The importance of future research evaluating, targeting, and improving positive affect in CBT trials is discussed. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01243606.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2019.06.008

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [30]Zinbarg RE, Craske MG, Barlow DH. Mastery of Your Anxiety and Worry 2 edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  2. [31]Foa EB, Yadin E, Lichner TK. Exposure and Response (Ritual) Prevention for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (Workbook) 2 edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, USA; 2012.
  3. [32]Yadin E, Foa EB, Lichner TK. Treating Your OCD with Exposure and Response 2 edition. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
  4. [49]Barlow DH, Farchione TJ, Sauer-Zavala S, Latin HM, Ellard KK, Bullis JR. Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Workbook 2 edition. Oxford University Press 2017.
  5. [50]Keyes C. The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Soc Behav 2002; 43: 207– 22. 12096700
  6. [51]Keyes CL. Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. Am Psychol 2007; 62: 95. 17324035
  7. [52]Chakhssi F, Kraiss JT, Sommers-Spijkerman M, Bohlmeijer ET. The effect of positive psychology interventions on well-being and distress in clinical samples with psychiatric or somatic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18: 211 10.1186/s12888-018-1739-2. 29945603 PMC6020379 · DOI
  8. [53]Mroczek DK, Kolarz CM. The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 75: 1333. 9866191
  9. [54]Magidson JF, Weisberg RB. Implementing cognitive behavioral therapy in specialty medical settings. Cogn Behav Pract 2014; 24: 367– 71. 10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.08.003. 27471371 PMC4961296 · DOI
  10. [55]Sumner LA, IsHak WW, Dang J, Vanle B, Mahtani N, Danovitch I. Psychological interventions in inpatient medical settings: A brief review. Int J Healthc Med Sci 2018; 4: 73– 83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilner Tirpak, J., Cassiello-Robbins, C., Ametaj, A., Olesnycky, O. S., Sauer-Zavala, S., Farchione, T. J., & Barlow, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Hofstra University (US)
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
61
Pages
111-115
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952328723
Cited by
29
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
positive affect, cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety disorders, Unified Protocol, savoring, quality of life, waitlist control
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review