The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS
HOOD, C. (1991) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x · Cited by 10,159
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance?
Stoker, G. (2006) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074005282583 · Cited by 1,351
Privacy in the Digital Age: a Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1
Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409971 · Cited by 1,339
Cited by
Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 · Cited by 1,990
Madan, R., & Ashok, M. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101774 · Cited by 468
“The institutional perspective focuses on developing a typology of public values such as Hood (1991) and Bannister and Connolly (2014).”
Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era
Höchtl, J., Parycek, P., & Schöllhammer, R. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187 · Cited by 331
“When talking about a transformation; however, the change has to go beyond a mere improvement of existing services and procedures (Bannister and Connolly 2014).”
BackgroundCriado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-07-2019-0178 · Cited by 339
Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion
Busch, P. A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2018) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-170050 · Cited by 267
Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda
Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917 · Cited by 266
Public value creation in digital government
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421 · Cited by 265
Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: The case of social services
Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.004 · Cited by 169
Wang, C., Teo, T. S. H., & Janssen, M. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102401 · Cited by 161
Lindgren, I., & van Veenstra, A. F. (2018) · Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age · doi:10.1145/3209281.3209302 · Cited by 128
Lee, T., Lee, B.-K., & Lee-Geiller, S. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102098 · Cited by 122
"The Computer Says No!" -- A Case Study on Automated Decision-Making in Public Authorities
Wihlborg, E., Larsson, H., & Hedstrom, K. (2016) · 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.364 · Cited by 106
Dobrolyubova, E. (2021) · NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy · doi:10.2478/nispa-2021-0003 · Cited by 72
The effects of e-Government cloud assimilation on public value creation: An empirical study of China
Liang, Y., Qi, G., Zhang, X., & Li, G. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101397 · Cited by 65
Data-Driven Policy Making: The Policy Lab Approach
van Veenstra, A. F., & Kotterink, B. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64322-9_9 · Cited by 60
James, A., & Whelan, A. (2022) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0261018320985463 · Cited by 45
"We Would Never Write That Down": Classifications of Unemployed and Data Challenges for AI
Petersen, A. C. M., Christensen, L. R., Harper, R., & Hildebrandt, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449176 · Cited by 37
Esko, T., & Koulu, R. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231164113 · Cited by 21
Al-Emadi, A., & Anouze, A. L. (2018) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/ijegr.2018010102 · Cited by 19
Handbook of Research on Artificial Intelligence in Government Practices and Processes
(2022) · Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9609-8 · Cited by 18
Conceptualising Contestability: Perspectives on Contesting Algorithmic Decisions
Lyons, H., Velloso, E., & Miller, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449180 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bannister, F., & Connolly, R.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-128
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156636549
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 154.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
