Cited by 3,359Climate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate variability and models

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 79 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 84 references

5 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jiang, 2014, Urbanization projections for the shared socioeconomic pathways, Global Environ. Change

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,004

Metadata

Authors
O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K. L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D. S., van Ruijven, B. J., van Vuuren, D. P., Birkmann, J., Kok, K., Levy, M., & Solecki, W.
Affiliations
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • University of Denver (US)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
  • University of Stuttgart (DE)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Hunter College (US)
Corresponding author
O’Neill, Brian C.
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
42
Pages
169-180
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992193293
Cited by
3,359
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 401 · 2025: 469 · 2024: 478 · 2023: 485 · 2022: 413 · 2021: 329 · 2020: 250 · 2019: 201 · 2018: 156 · 2017: 93
FWCI
266.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, long-term scenarios, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, social development, expert opinion, future scenarios, human development, technology and institutions, natural resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review