Cited by 417Climate Change Policy and EconomicsIntegrated Energy Systems OptimizationSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives

Open access
Bauer, Nico, Calvin, Katherine, Emmerling, Johannes, Fricko, Oliver, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Hilaire, Jérôme, Eom, Jiyong, Krey, Volker +20 more·2017·Global Environmental Change

Abstract

Energy is crucial for supporting basic human needs, development and well-being. The future evolution of the scale and character of the energy system will be fundamentally shaped by socioeconomic conditions and drivers, available energy resources, technologies of energy supply and transformation, and end-use energy demand. However, because energy-related activities are significant sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and other environmental and social externalities, energy system development will also be influenced by social acceptance and strategic policy choices. All of these uncertainties have important implications for many aspects of economic and environmental sustainability, and climate change in particular. In the Shared-Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) framework these uncertainties are structured into five narratives, arranged according to the challenges to climate change mitigation and adaptation. In this study we explore future energy sector developments across the five SSPs using Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), and we also provide summary output and analysis for selected scenarios of global emissions mitigation policies. The mitigation challenge strongly corresponds with global baseline energy sector growth over the 21st century, which varies between 40% and 230% depending on final energy consumer behavior, technological improvements, resource availability and policies. The future baseline CO 2 -emission range is even larger, as the most energy-intensive SSP also incorporates a comparatively high share of carbon-intensive fossil fuels, and vice versa. Inter-regional disparities in the SSPs are consistent with the underlying socioeconomic assumptions; these differences are particularly strong in the SSPs with large adaptation challenges, which have little inter-regional convergence in long-term income and final energy demand levels. The scenarios presented do not include feedbacks of climate change on energy sector development. The energy sector SSPs with and without emissions mitigation policies are introduced and analyzed here in order to contribute to future research in climate sciences, mitigation analysis, and studies on impacts, adaptation and vulnerability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Aguilera, R.F., Eggert, R.G., Lagos, C.C.G., Tilton, J.E., 2009. Depletion and the future availability of petroleum resources. Energy J. 30, 141 -174. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0005)
  2. Bauer, N., Bosetti, V., Hamdi-Cherif, M., Kitous, A., McCollum, D., Méjean, A., Rao, S., Turton, H., Paroussos, L., Ashina, S., Calvin, K., Wada, K., van Vuuren, D., 2015. CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: dynamic and international aspects of climate policies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 243 -256. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.009. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0010) · DOI
  3. Bauer, N., Hilaire, J., Brecha, R.J., Edmonds, J., Jiang, K., Kriegler, E., Rogner, H.-H., Sferra, F., 2016. Assessing global fossil fuel availability in a scenario framework. Energy 111, 580 -592. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.088. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0015) · DOI
  4. Bazilian, M., Rogner, H., Howells, M., Hermann, S., Arent, D., Gielen, D., Steduto, P., Mueller, A., Komor, P., Tol, R.S.J., Yumkella, K.K., 2011. Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy Clean Cook. Fuels Technol. Dev. Econ. 39, 7896 -7906. doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.039. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0020) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Blanco, G., Gerlagh, R., Suh, S., Barrett, J., de Coninck, H., Diaz Morejon, C.F., Mathur, R., Nakicenovic, N., Ofosu Ahenkora, A., Pan, J., Pathak, H., Rice, J., Richels, R., Smith, S.J., Stern, D.I., Toth, F.L., Zhou, P., 2014. Drivers, trends and mitigation. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0025)
  6. Bruckner, T., Bashmakov, I.A., Mulugetta, Y., Chum, H., de la Vega Navarro, A., Edmonds, J., Faaij, A., Fungtammasan, B., Garg, A., Hertwich, E., Honnery, D., In fi eld, D., Kainuma, M., Khennas, S., Kim, S., Nimir, H.B., Riahi, K., Strachan, N., Wiser, R., Zhang, X., 2014. Energy Systems, In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0030)
  7. Burke, M., Craxton, M., Kolstad, C.D., Onda, C., Allcott, H., Baker, E., Barrage, L., Carson, R., Gillingham, K., Graff-Zivin, J., Greenstone, M., Hallegatte, S., Hanemann, W.M., Heal, G., Hsiang, S., Jones, B., Kelly, D.L., Kopp, R., Kotchen, M., Mendelsohn, R., Meng, K., Metcalf, G., Moreno-Cruz, J., Pindyck, R., Rose, S., Rudik, I., Stock, J., Tol, R.S.J., 2016. Opportunities for advances in climate change economics. Science 352, 292 -293. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. aad9634. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0035) · DOI · Paper page
  8. Calvin, K., Bond-Lamberty, B., Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Eom, J., Hartin, C., Kim, S., Kyle, P., Link, R., Moss, R.H., McJeon, H.C., Patel, P., Smith, S., Waldhoff, S., Wise, M., 2017. SSP4: A world of inequality. Global Environ. Change 42, 284 -296. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0040)
  9. Chandramowli, S.N., Felder, F.A., 2014. Impact of climate change on electricity systems and markets -a review of models and forecasts. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 5, 62 -74. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2013.11.003. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0045) · DOI
  10. Ciscar, J.-C., Dowling, P., 2014. Integrated assessment of climate impacts and adaptation in the energy sector. Energy Econ. 46, 531 -538. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.003. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0050) · DOI · Paper page
  11. Clarke, L., Jiang, K., Akimoto, K., Babiker, M., Blanford, G., Fisher-Vanden, K., Hourcade, J.-C., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Löschel, A., McCollum, D., Paltsev, S., Rose, S., Shukla, P.R., Tavoni, M., van der Zwaan, B., van Vuuren, P., 2014. Assessing transformation pathways. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadne, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., Stechow, C., von Zwicke, T., Minx, J.C. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0055)
  12. Csereklyei, Z., Stern, D.I., 2015. Global energy use: decoupling or convergence? Energy Econ. 51, 633 -641. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.029. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0060) · DOI
  13. Edmonds, J., Wilson, T., Wise, M., Weyant, J., 2006. Electri fi cation of the economy and CO2 emissions mitigation. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 7,175 -203. doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03353999. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0070) · DOI
  14. Fouquet, R., Pearson, P.J.G., 2012. Past and prospective energy transitions: Insights from history. Energy Policy, Special Section: Past and Prospective Energy Transitions -Insights from History 50, 1 -7. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.014 · DOI
  15. Fricko, O., Havlik, P., Rogelj, J., Klimont, Z., Gusti, M., Johnson, N., Kolp, P., Strubegger, M., Valin, H., Amann, M., Ermolieva, T., Forsell, N., Herrero, M., Heyes, C., Kindermann, G., Krey, V., McCollum, D.L., Obersteiner, M., Pachauri, S., Rao, S., Schmid, E., Schoepp, W., Riahi, K., 2017. The marker quanti fi cation of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: a middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21 st century. Global Environ. Change 42, 251 -267. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2016.06.004. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0085) · DOI
  16. Fujimori, S., Hasegawa, T., Masui, T., Takahashi, K., Silva Herran, H.Y.H., Dai, Y., Kainuma, M., 2017. SSP3: AIM implementation of shared socioeconomic pathways. Global Environ. Change 42, 268 -283. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2016.06.009. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0095) · DOI
  17. Geels, F.W., Berkhout, F., van Vuuren, D.P., 2016. Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 576 -583. doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nclimate2980. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0100) · DOI
  18. Goldemberg, J., 1998. Leapfrog energy technologies. Energy Policy 26, 729 -741. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00025-1. · DOI
  19. Grübler, A., Nakicenovic, N., Victor, D.G., 1999. Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy 27, 247 -280. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S03014215(98)00067-6. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0110) · DOI
  20. Grübler, A., Johansson, T.B., Mundaca, L., Nakicenovic, N., Pachauri, S., Riahi, K., Rogner, H.-H., Strupeit, L., 2012. Chapter 1 -energy primer. Global Energy Assessment -Toward a Sustainable Future. Cambridge University Press, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA Laxenburg, Austria, pp. 99 -150. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0115)
  21. IEA, 2012. Energy Balances of Non-OECD and OECD Countries -2012 Edition. International Energy Agency, Paris. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0120)
  22. Isaac, M., van Vuuren, D.P., 2009. Modeling global residential sector energy demand for heating and air conditioning in the context of climate change. Energy Policy 37, 507 -521. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.051. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0125) · DOI
  23. Jakob, M., Haller, M., Marschinski, R., 2012. Will history repeat itself? Economic convergence and convergence in energy use patterns. Energy Econ. 34, 95 -104. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.008. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0130) · DOI
  24. Jewell, J., Cherp, A., Riahi, K., 2014. Energy security under de-carbonization scenarios: an assessment framework and evaluation under different technology and policy choices. Energy Policy 65, 743 -760. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2013.10.051. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0135) · DOI
  25. KC, S., Lutz, W., 2017. The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Global Environ. Change 42, 181 -192. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2014.06.004. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0140) · DOI
  26. Krey, V., Luderer, G., Clarke, L., Kriegler, E., 2014. Getting from here to there -energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. Clim. Change 123, 369 -382. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0145) · DOI
  27. Kriegler, E., O ' Neill, B.C., Hallegatte, S., Kram, T., Lempert, R.J., Moss, R.H., Wilbanks, T., 2012. The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: A new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environ. Change 22, 807 -822. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2012.05.005. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0150) · DOI
  28. Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., Hallegatte, S., Ebi, K.L., Kram, T., Riahi, K., Winkler, H., Vuuren, D.P. van, 2014. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions. Clim. Change 122, 401 -414. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0155) · DOI
  29. Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Bauer, N., Schwanitz, V.J., Petermann, N., Bosetti, V., Marcucci, A., Otto, S., Paroussos, L., Rao, S., Arroyo Currás, T., Ashina, S., Bollen, J., Eom, J., Hamdi-Cherif, M., Longden, T., Kitous, A., Méjean, A., Sano, F., Schaeffer, M., Wada, K., Capros, P., van Vuuren, P., Edenhofer, D., 2015. Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 24 -44. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2013.09.021 Part A. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0160) · DOI
  30. Lamb, W.F., Rao, N.D., 2015. Human development in a climate-constrained world: What the past says about the future. Global Environ. Change 33, 14 -22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.010. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0170) · DOI
  31. McCollum, D., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Kitous, A., Riahi, K., 2014. Fossil resource and energy security dynamics in conventional and carbon-constrained worlds. Clim. Change 123, 413 -426. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0939-5. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0175) · DOI
  32. McGlade, C., Ekins, P., 2015. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 C. Nature 517, 187 -190. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nature14016. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0180) · DOI · Paper page
  33. Moss, R.H., Edmonds, J.A., Hibbard, K.A., Manning, M.R., Rose, S.K., Vuuren, D.P., van Carter, T.R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., Meehl, G.A., Mitchell, J.F.B., Nakicenovic, N., Riahi, K., Smith, S.J., Stouffer, R.J., Thomson, A.M., Weyant, J.P., Wilbanks, T.J., 2010. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747 -756. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature08823. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0185)
  34. Nakicenovic, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B., Fenhann, J., Gaf fi n, S., Gregory, K., Grubler, A., Jung, T.Y., Kram, T., La Rovere, E.L., Michaelis, L., Mori, S., Morita, T., Pepper, W., Pitcher, H.M., Price, L., Riahi, K., Roehrl, A., Rogner, H.-H., Sankovski, A., Schlesinger, M., Shukla, P., Smith, S.J., Swart, R., van Rooijen, S., Victor, N., Dadi, Z., 2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (No PNNLSA-39650). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0190)
  35. Pachauri, S., Ruijven, B.J., van Nagai, Y., Riahi, K., Vuuren, D.P., van Brew-Hammond, A., Nakicenovic, N., 2013. Pathways to achieve universal household access to modern energy by. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 24015. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1748-9326/8/2/024015. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0200)
  36. Popp, A., Calvin, K., Fujimori, S., Havlik, P., Humpenöder, F., Stehfest, E., Bodirsky, B., Dietrich, J.P., Doelmann, J., Gusti, M., Hasegawa, T., Kyle, P., Obersteiner, M., Tabeau, A., Takahashi, K., Valin, H., Waldhoff, S., Weindl, I., Wise, M., Kriegler, E., Lotze-Campen, H., Fricko, O., Riahi, K., Van Vuuren, D.P., 2017. Land use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environ. Change 42, 331 -345. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0205)
  37. Rao, S., Klimont, Z., Smith, S.J., Van Dingenen, R., Dentener, F., Bouwman, L., Riahi, K., Amann, M., Bodirsky, B., van Vuuren, D.P., Aleluia Reis, L., Calvin, K., Drouet, L., Fricko, O., Fujimori, S., Gernaat, D., Havlik, P., Harmsen, M., Hasegawa, T., Heyes, C., Stef fl er, J., Luderer, G., Masui, T., Stehfest, E., Hilaire, J., Van Der Sluis, S., Tavoni, M., 2017. Future air pollution in the shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environ. Change 42, 346 -358. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2016.05.012. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0210) · DOI
  38. Riahi K., Dentener F., Gielen D., Grubler A., Jewell J., Klimont Z., Krey V., McCollum D., Pachauri S., Rao S., van Ruijven B., Van Vuuren D.P., Wilson C., 2012. Chapter 17: Energy Pathways for Sustainable Development, in: Global Energy Assessment -Toward a Sustainable Future. Cambridge University Press and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA and Laxenburg, Austria, pp. 1203 -1306.
  39. Riahi, Keywan, van Vuuren, Detlef P., Kriegler, Elmar, Edmonds, Jae, O ' Neill, Brian, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Bauer, Nico, Calvin, Katherine, Dellink, Rob, Fricko, Oliver, Lutz, Wolfgang, Popp, Alexander, Cuaresma, Jesus Crespo, Samir, K.C., Leimbach, Marian, Jiang, Leiwen, Kram, Tom, Rao, Shilpa, Emmerling, Johannes, Ebi, Kristie, Hasegawa, Tomoko, Havlik, Petr, Humpenöder, Florian, Da Silva, Lara Aleluia, Smith, Steve, Stehfest, Elke, Bosetti, Valentina, Eom, Jiyong, Gernaat, David, Masui, Toshihiko, Rogelj, Joeri, Stre fl er, Jessica, Drouet, Laurent, Krey, Volker, Luderer, Gunnar, Harmsen, Mathijs, Takahashi, Kiyoshi, Baumstark, Lavinia, Doelman, Jonathan, Kainuma, Mikiko, Klimont, Zbigniew, Marangoni, Giacomo, Lotze-Campen, Hermann, Obersteiner, Michael, Tabeau, Andrzej, Tavon, Massimo, 2017. Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: An Overview. Global Environ. Change 42, 153 -168. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0220) · DOI · Paper page
  40. Rogner, H.-H., Aguilera, R.F., Archer, C.L., Bertani, R., Bhattacharya, S.C., Dusseault, M. B., Gagnon, L., Haberl, H., Hoogwijk, M., Johnson, A., Rogner, M.L., Wagner, H., Yakushev, V., 2012. Chapter 7: energy resources and potentials. In: Zou, J. (Ed.), Global Energy Assessment -Toward a Sustainable Future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 425 -512. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0225)
  41. Rose, S.K., Kriegler, E., Bibas, R., Calvin, K., Popp, A., Vuuren, D.P., van Weyant, J., 2013. Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management. Clim. Change 123, 477 -493. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0965-3. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0230) · DOI
  42. Schäfer, A., 2005. Structural change in energy use. Energy Policy 33, 429 -437. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.09.002. · DOI
  43. Sims, R., Schaeffer, R., Creutzig, F., Cruz-Núñez, X., D ' Agosto, M., Dimitriu, D., Figueroa Meza, M.J., Fulton, L., Kobayashi, S., Lah, O., McKinnon, A., Newman, P., Ouyang, M., Schauer, J.J., Sperling, D., Tiwari, G., 2014. Transport. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Steckel, J.C., Brecha, R.J., Jakob, M., Stre fl er, J., Luderer, G., 2013. Development without energy? Assessing future scenarios of energy consumption in developing countries. Ecol. Econ. 90, 53 -67. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2013.02.006. · DOI
  44. Sugiyama, M., 2014. Climate change mitigation and electri fi cation. Energy Policy 44, 464 -468. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.028. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0250) · DOI
  45. Trutnevyte, E., Guivarch, C., Lempert, R., Strachan, N., 2016. Reinvigorating the scenario technique to expand uncertainty consideration. Clim. Change 135, 373 -379. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1585-x. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0255) · DOI
  46. Turkenburg, W., Beurskens, J., Fraenkel, A.F.P., Fridleifsson, I., Mills, E.L.D., Moreira, J. R., Nilsson, L.J., Schaap, A., Sinke, W.C., 2000. World Energy Assessment (WEA). United Nations Development Programme. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0260)
  47. Unruh, G.C., 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28, 817 -830. van Vuuren, P. Detlef, Elke Stehfest, David Gernaat, E.H.J., Jonathan Doelman, C., Maarten van den Berg, Mathijs Harmsen, Harmen -Sytze de Boer, Lex Bouwman, F., Vassilis Daioglou, Oreane Edelenbosch, Y., Bastien Girod, Tom Kram, Luis Lassaletta, Paul Lucas, L., Hans van Meijl, Christoph Müller, Bas van Ruijven, J., Andrzej Tabeau, 2017. Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. Global Environ. Change 42, 237 -250. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0250)
  48. Vuuren, D.P., Carter, van, 2014. Climate and socio-economic scenarios for climate change research and assessment: reconciling the new with the old. Clim. Change 122, 415 -429. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0974-2. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0275) · DOI
  49. van Sluisveld, M.A.E., Harmsen, J.H.M., Bauer, N., McCollum, D.L., Riahi, K., Tavoni, M., van Vuuren, D.P., Wilson, C., van der Zwaan, B., 2015. Comparing future patterns of energy system change in 2 C scenarios with historically observed rates of change. Global Environ. Change 35, 436 -449. doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.019. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0280) · DOI
  50. van Vuuren, D.P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G.C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Masui, T., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., Smith, S.J., Rose, S.K., 2011. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim. Change 109, 5 -31. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-0110148-z. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0285) · DOI
  51. van Vuuren, D.P., Kok, M.T.J., Girod, B., Lucas, P.L., de Vries, B., 2012. Scenarios in global environmental assessments: key characteristics and lessons for future use. Global Environ. Change 22, 884 -895. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2012.06.001. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0290) · DOI
  52. van Vuuren, D.P., Kriegler, E., O ' Neill, B.C., Ebi, K.L., Riahi, K., Carter, T.R., Edmonds, J., Hallegatte, S., Kram, T., Mathur, R., Winkler, H., 2014. A new scenario framework for climate change research: scenario matrix architecture. Clim. Change 122, 373 -386. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0906-1. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0295) · DOI
  53. von Stechow, C., McCollum, D., Riahi, K., Minx, J.C., Kriegler, E., van Vuuren, D.P., Jewell, J., Robledo-Abad, C., Hertwich, E., Tavoni, M., Mirasgedis, S., Lah, O., Roy, J., Mulugetta, Y., Dubash, N.K., Bollen, J., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Edenhofer, O., 2015. Integrating global climate change mitigation goals with other sustainability objectives: a synthesis. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40, 363 -394. doi:http://dx. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-021113-095626. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0300) · DOI
  54. Wilson, C., Grubler, A., Bauer, N., Krey, V., Riahi, K., 2013. Future capacity growth of energy technologies: are scenarios consistent with historical evidence? Clim. Change 118, 381 -395. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0618-y. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-3780(1630122-4/sbref0305) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Emmerling, J., Fricko, O., Fujimori, S., Hilaire, J., Eom, J., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Mouratiadou, I., Sytze de Boer, H., van den Berg, M., Carrara, S., Daioglou, V., Drouet, L., Edmonds, J. E., Gernaat, D., Havlik, P., Johnson, N., Klein, D., Kyle, P., Marangoni, G., Masui, T., Pietzcker, R. C., Strubegger, M., Wise, M., Riahi, K., & van Vuuren, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • CMCC Foundation - Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (IT)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
  • Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (DE)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
Corresponding author
Bauer, Nico
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
42
Pages
316-330
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514521744
Cited by
417
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7
FWCI
60.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01LA11020B)
  • “Global Environmental Research Fund”
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, energy sector, future energy scenarios, CO2 emissions, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, climate change adaptation, integrated assessment models, end-use energy demand, fossil fuel dependence, inter-regional disparities, climate change impacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review