Cited by 21Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

The interplay between social media use and problematic internet usage: Four behavioral patterns

Open access
Chemnad, Khansa, Aziz, Maryam, Belhaouari, Samir Brahim, Ali, Raian·2023·Heliyon

Abstract

Objective The study aims to identify typical interplay between the use of social media apps on smartphones and Problematic Internet Usage (PIU). Method Our study utilizes data from a smartphone app that objectively monitors user usage, including the apps used and the start and finish times of each app session. This study included 334 participants who declared a need to be aware of their smartphone usage and control it. Problematic Internet Usage (PIU) was measured using the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire-Short Form-6 (PIUQ-SF6). The total PIU score can range from 6 to 30, with a score above 15 indicating that a person is at risk of PIU. Time spent on Social Media (SM) apps of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram, and whether people used each of these apps were studied along with the total PIU score. K-Prototype clustering was utilized for the analysis. Results Four distinct clusters, typifying the relationship between social media use and PIU, were identified. All the individuals in Cluster 1 ( Light SM Use Cluster; Cluster size = 270, 80.84% of total dataset) spent between 0 and 109.01 min on Instagram, between 0 and 69.84 min on Facebook, and between 0 and 86.42 min on WhatsApp and its median PIU score was 17. Those who were in cluster 2 ( Highly Visual SM Cluster; Cluster size = 23, 6.89% of total dataset) all used Instagram, and each member spent between 110 and 307.63 min on Instagram daily. The cluster median PIU score and average daily usage of Instagram were respectively 20 and 159.66 min. Those who were in Cluster 3 ( Conversational SM Cluster; Cluster size = 19, 5.69% of total dataset) all used WhatsApp, and spent between 76.68 and 225.22 min on WhatsApp daily. The cluster median PIU score and average time spent per day on WhatsApp were 20 and 132.65 min, respectively. Those who were in Cluster 4 ( Social Networking Cluster; (Cluster size = 22, 6.59% of total dataset) all used Facebook, and each spent between 73.09 and 272.85 min daily on Facebook. The cluster median PIU score and average time spent per day on Facebook were 18 and 133.61 min respectively. Conclusion The clusters indicate that those who use a particular social media app spend significantly less time on other social media apps. This indicates that problematic attachment to social media occurs primarily for one of three reasons: visual content and reels, conversations with peers, or surfing network content and news. This finding will help tailor interventions to fit each cluster, for example by strengthening interpersonal skills and resistance to peer pressure in the case of Cluster 3 and increasing impulse control in the case of Cluster 2.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15745

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BSS was positively and significantly associated with the YIAT-SF (r = .58, p < .001).

    “and the YIAT-SF (r = .58, p < .001).”

    From The binge scrolling scale measures excessive scrolling through a validated three-factor structure (2025) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Methodology > Measures section says the study measured problematic internet use with the PIUQ-SF-6, and Discussion > Limitations says it did not use the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. Searches for BSS, YIAT-SF, and the reported r = .58, p < .001 association found no passage reporting that relationship in our copy (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]Attrill A. Cyberpsychology 2015 Oxford University Press Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. [16]Chow H. Predicting Problematic Internet Use In A Sample Of Canadian University Students', Undefined 2017 Accessed: Mar. 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Predicting-Problematic-Internet-Use-in-A-Sample-of-Chow/05847e0b0b43c4311a7a87623702ca411c93ace0

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chemnad, K., Aziz, M., Belhaouari, S. B., & Ali, R.
Affiliations
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
Corresponding author
  • Chemnad, Khansa
  • Aziz, Maryam
  • Ali, Raian
Venue
Heliyon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e15745
ISSN
2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366824939
Cited by
21
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Qatar National Library
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
problematic internet use, social media use, smartphone app usage, Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook, behavioral patterns, screen time monitoring, social networking apps, k-prototypes clustering, digital addiction prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review