Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control

Open access
El-Chami, Mikhael F., Al-Samadi, Faisal, Clementy, Nicolas, Garweg, Christophe, Martinez-Sande, Jose Luis, Piccini, Jonathan P., Iacopino, Saverio, Lloyd, Michael, Viñolas Prat, Xavier, Jacobsen, Michael Dilou, Ritter, Philippe, Johansen, Jens Brock, Tondo, Claudio, Liu, Fang, Fagan, Dedra H., Eakley, Alyssa K., Roberts, Paul R.·2018·Heart Rhythm

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early results of the Micra Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study and Micra Post-Approval Registry (PAR) demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy performance; however, intermediate-term results across a large patient population in the real-world setting have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: We report updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker from a worldwide PAR and compare it with the IDE study as well as a transvenous historical control. METHODS: The safety objective of the analysis was system- or procedure-related major complications through 12 months postimplantation. We compared the major complication rate with that of the 726 patients from the IDE and with a reference data set of 2667 patients with transvenous pacemakers by using a Fine-Gray competing risk model. RESULTS: The Micra device was successfully implanted in 1801 of 1817 patients (99.1%). The mean follow-up period was 6.8 ± 6.9 months. Through 12 months, the major complication rate was 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0%-3.7%). The risk of major complications for Micra PAR patients was 63% lower than that for patients with transvenous pacemakers through 12 months postimplantation (hazard ratio 0.37; 95% CI 0.27-0.52; P < .001). The major complication rate trended lower in the PAR than in the IDE study (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI 0.44-1.1; P = .160), driven by the lower pericardial effusion rate in the PAR. There were 3 cases of infection associated with the procedure, but none required device removal and there were no battery or telemetry issues. Pacing thresholds were low and stable through 12 months postimplantation. CONCLUSION: Performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in international clinical practice remains consistent with previously reported data. Major complications were infrequent and occurred 63% less often compared to transvenous systems. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Post-Approval Registry ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02536118; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02004873.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.08.005

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
El-Chami, M. F., Al-Samadi, F., Clementy, N., Garweg, C., Martinez-Sande, J. L., Piccini, J. P., Iacopino, S., Lloyd, M., Viñolas Prat, X., Jacobsen, M. D., Ritter, P., Johansen, J. B., Tondo, C., Liu, F., Fagan, D. H., Eakley, A. K., & Roberts, P. R.
Venue
Heart Rhythm
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1800-1807
ISSN
1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885247491
Cited by
355
References
10
FWCI
23.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.08.005
The paper
El-Chami, M. F., Al-Samadi, F., Clementy, N., Garweg, C., Martinez-Sande, J. L., Piccini, J. P., Iacopino, S., Lloyd, M., Viñolas Prat, X., Jacobsen, M. D., Ritter, P., Johansen, J. B., Tondo, C., Liu, F., Fagan, D. H., Eakley, A. K., & Roberts, P. R. (2018). Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control. Heart Rhythm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.08.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.