Cited by 74Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilitySocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Perseverations of the academy: a survey of wearable technologies applied to autism intervention

Williams, Rua M., Gilbert, Juan E.·2020·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102485

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These technologies are used to classify and predict behavior for the purpose of coding, analysis, and interventions aimed at modifying the behaviors of autistic individuals.

    “These technologies are used to classify and predict behavior for the purpose of coding, analysis, and interventions aimed at modifying the behaviors of autistic individuals”

    From Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes (2022) · cites this paper as Williams and Gilbert, 2020

  • The growing interest in surveillance technologies and AI within health and rehabilitation sectors to "normalize, reprogram, or extinguish autistic traits" is a form of "tech-saviorism" that reflects eugenic logics.

    “As an example, the growing interest in surveillance technologies and AI within health and rehabilitation sectors to “normalize, reprogram, or extinguish autistic traits” is a form “tech-saviorism” that reflects eugenic logics”

    From Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes (2022) · cites this paper as Williams and Gilbert, 2020

  • Across HCI studies, there is a tendency to design systems that address perceived neurodivergent behaviours from an external viewpoint without adequately considering internal struggles.

    “Across a number of studies [9, 29, 30, 39, 54, 55, 64, 74, 81, 90, 93], there is a noticeable tendency to design systems that address perceived neurodivergent behaviours, often from an external viewpoint, without adequately considering the internal struggles experienced by neurodivergent individuals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, R. M., & Gilbert, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
143
Pages
102485
ISSN
1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033631891
Cited by
74
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
wearable devices, autism intervention, autism spectrum disorder, social skills training, sensorimotor integration, emotion regulation, executive function, communication, critical disability studies, assistive technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review