Cited by 154Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Untended wounds: Non-suicidal self-injury in adults with autism spectrum disorder

Maddox, Brenna B, Trubanova, Andrea, White, Susan W·2017·Autism

Abstract

Recent studies have examined non-suicidal self-injury in community and clinical samples, but there is no published research on non-suicidal self-injury in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. This lack of research is surprising, since individuals with autism spectrum disorder have high rates of risk factors for non-suicidal self-injury, including depression and poor emotion regulation skills. Using an online survey, we examined non-suicidal self-injury methods, frequency, severity, functions, and initial motivations in adults with autism spectrum disorder ( n = 42). We also compared their non-suicidal self-injury characteristics to those of a gender-matched group of adults without autism spectrum disorder ( n = 42). Of the participants with autism spectrum disorder, 50% reported a history of non-suicidal self-injury. This proportion is higher than non-suicidal self-injury rates previously reported for college students, adult community samples, and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, which suggests that adults with autism spectrum disorder have increased risk for engaging in non-suicidal self-injury. Women with autism spectrum disorder were significantly more likely to endorse non-suicidal self-injury, relative to men with autism spectrum disorder. A history of non-suicidal self-injury was not related to current depression or emotion dysregulation for the participants with autism spectrum disorder. Non-suicidal self-injury characteristics among the adults with autism spectrum disorder were similar to non-suicidal self-injury in adults without autism spectrum disorder. These preliminary findings highlight the need for increased awareness and further research about non-suicidal self-injury within autism spectrum disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361316644731

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maddox et al. found 50% of their autistic sample (n = 42) had engaged in at least one act of NSSI, indicating increased prevalence of NSSI in autistic compared with typically developing populations.

    “Crucially, it highlighted the increased prevalence of NSSI in autistic as compared with typically developing populations, with 50% of the autistic sample (n = 42) having engaged in at least one act of NSSI—an inflated prevalence that motivates further study of NSSI in a larger sample of these individuals within the autism spectrum.”
  • Maddox et al. found no significant differences in age, depression or emotion dysregulation between autistic self-harmers and autistic non-self-harmers, but a higher proportion of autistic women than autistic men engaged in NSSI.

    “These authors also compared autistic self-harmers to autistic people who did not engage in NSSI: they found no significant differences in age, depression or emotion dysregulation, but a higher proportion of autistic women than autistic men engaged in NSSI.”
  • Maddox et al. found no significant differences in depression and emotion dysregulation between autistic self-harmers and autistic non-self-harmers and suggested these factors are not associated with increased risk of self-injury.

    “They found no significant differences between groups and so suggest that these factors are not associated with increased risk of self-injury.”
  • Maddox et al. delineated a different type of NSSI in autistic people without intellectual disability, resembling that seen in neurotypical populations.

    “Maddox et al. [15] were recently the first to delineate a different type of NSSI, one resembling that seen in neurotypical populations, in autistic people without intellectual disability (all of whom had completed high school, the majority of whom had college qualifications).”
  • Maddox et al. found more similarities than differences between autistic and non-autistic self-harmers; both began self-injuring in early adolescence and did not differ in the specific NSSI they engaged in.

    “They found more similarities than differences between their small groups of autistic and non-autistic (typically developing) self-harmers; both began self-injuring in early adolescence and did not differ in the specific NSSI they engaged in.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maddox, B. B., Trubanova, A., & White, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Virginia Tech, USA
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Maddox, Brenna B
Venue
Autism
Published
2016-05-12
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
412-422
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2380785725
Cited by
154
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Virginia Tech Graduate Research Development Program (N/A)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, self-injury methods, functions of self-injury, gender differences, depression, emotional dysregulation, risk factors
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review