Euthanasia requests in a Canadian psychiatric emergency room: A case series
Abstract
Euthanasia was decriminalized in Quebec in December 2015, and Canada-wide in June 2016. Both the Provincial and Federal legislation have limited the right to medical assistance in dying (MAID) to end-of-life cases; which makes MAID inaccessible to most patients solely suffering from psychiatric illness. While some end-stage anorexia nervosa or elderly patients may meet the end-of-life criterion because of their medical comorbidities or their age (Kelly et al., 2003), repeated suicide attempts or psychotic disorganization would not qualify since they would not be seen as elements of an illness leading to a foreseeable "natural death" (Canada, 2016). This is in contradiction to other jurisdictions, such as Belgium and the Netherlands as well as the eligibility criteria stated in the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Carter v. Canada (Supreme Court of Canada, 2015). Here we analyze three cases of patients who presented to a psychiatric emergency department and requested MAID for psychiatric reasons. While none of the patients were eligible for MAID under Canadian law, we find that their demographics match closely that of patients granted MAID for psychiatric reasons in jurisdictions where that practice is allowed. Based on these cases, we comment on potentially negative consequences that may come from decriminalizing MAID for psychiatric reasons (such as an increased assessment burden on ED staff) and potentially positive consequences (such as encouraging suffering patients who had not consulted to seek care). While it is by no means our intention to take a political or moral stand on this important issue, or to conclusively weigh the negatives and positives of allowing MAID for psychiatric reasons, we do stress the importance of an active voice for psychiatry in this ongoing public debate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MAiD-MD can generate issues of transference and countertransference, particularly given the enduring relationship that some patients have with their healthcare professional.
“MAiD-MD can generate issues of transference and countertransference, in particular given the enduring relationship that some patients have with their healthcare professional [2, 28, 53, 59, 60, 71, 76].”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
In Canada, a series of psychiatric patients who applied for MAiD-NT were denied it although, based on their characteristics, they would have been eligible for MAiD-NT in other countries such as Belgium or the Netherlands.
“A series of cases of patients with psychiatric disorders who applied for MAiD-NT were denied it, although, based on their characteristics, would have been eligible for MAiD-NT in other countries (e.g. Belgium, Netherlands) [67, 68].”
From Debating Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Death in People with Psychiatric Disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [68]
For some disorders, such as borderline personality disorders, a physician intervening by MAiD-NT could encounter moral distress because the criteria might not consider the common fluctuating suicidal ideation and behavior, contemporary psychosocial rehabilitation treatment, and the individual's potential for a life worth living.
“For some disorders, such as borderline personality disorders, a physician intervening by MAiD-NT could encounter moral distress, since the criteria for the procedure might not take into consideration the common fluctuating suicidal ideation and behavior in these disorders, the contemporary forms of psychosocial rehabilitation treatment, and the individual’s potential for having a life worth living”
From Debating Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Death in People with Psychiatric Disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [68]
Adding a more rigorous assessment process for MAiD-MD requests, including various safeguards, could impose an additional burden on an already struggling healthcare system.
“In this context, adding a more rigorous assessment process for MAiD-MD requests, including various safeguards, could impose an additional burden on an already struggling system [28, 45].”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
MAiD-MD may seem irreconcilable with the valuing of recovery-oriented approaches in mental health care, and some fear that its introduction into the continuum of care will cause a paradigm shift from improving quality of life towards assessing eligibility for MAiD-MD.
“MAiD-MD may seem irreconcilable with the valuing of recovery-oriented approaches in mental health care [65], and some fear that its introduction into the continuum of care will cause a paradigm shift from a goal of improving quality of life towards a goal of assessing eligibility for MAiD-MD [28].”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Transference and countertransference can lead healthcare professionals to facilitate access to MAiD-MD, or to respond to a MAiD-MD request with hostility, which could make a patient reluctant to share suicidal thoughts, push them to act on those thoughts, or lead them to change healthcare professionals, thus harming continuity of care.
“Transference and countertransference often come together and are usually unconscious, but they can lead healthcare professionals to facilitate access to MAiD-MD, or to respond to a MAiD-MD request with hostility, which could subsequently make a patient reluctant to share their suicidal thoughts, push them to act on those suicidal thoughts, or lead them to change healthcare professionals, thus harm”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Cites
Kim, S. Y. H., De Vries, R. G., & Peteet, J. R. (2016) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2887 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Thienpont, L., Verhofstadt, M., Van Loon, T., Distelmans, W., Audenaert, K., & De Deyn, P. P. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007454 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Steck, N., Egger, M., Maessen, M., Reisch, T., & Zwahlen, M. (2013) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e3182a0f427 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Curlin, F. A., Nwodim, C., Vance, J. L., Chin, M. H., & Lantos, J. D. (2008) · American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® · doi:10.1177/1049909107310141 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Effects of euthanasia on the bereaved family and friends: a cross sectional study
Swarte, N. B., van der Lee, M. L., van der Bom, J. G., van den Bout, J., & Heintz, A. P. M. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7408.189 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
McCormack, R., & Fléchais, R. (2012) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/j.psym.2012.03.005 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Physician-assisted suicide in psychiatry and loss of hope
Berghmans, R., Widdershoven, G., & Widdershoven-Heerding, I. (2013) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.06.020 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Euthanasia: The role of the psychiatrist
Naudts, K., Ducatelle, C., Kovacs, J., Laurens, K., Van Den Eynde, F., & Van Heeringen, C. (2006) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.010256 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The terminal, the futile, and the psychiatrically disordered
Cholbi, M. J. (2013) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.06.011 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Countertransference and ethics: A perspective on clinical dilemmas in end-of-life decisions
Kelly, B. J., Varghese, F. T. N., & Pelusi, D. (2003) · Palliative & Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951503030517 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Physician-assisted dying and psychiatry: Recent developments in the Netherlands
Pols, H., & Oak, S. (2013) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.06.015 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Euthanasia and assisted suicide in psychiatric patients: A systematic review of the literature
Calati, R., Olié, E., Dassa, D., Gramaglia, C., Guillaume, S., Madeddu, F., & Courtet, P. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.006 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Debating Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Death in People with Psychiatric Disorders
Grassi, L., Folesani, F., Marella, M., Tiberto, E., Riba, M. B., Bortolotti, L., Toffanin, T., Palagini, L., Belvederi Murri, M., Biancosino, B., et al. (2022) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-022-01339-y · Cited by 39 · see citing works
What medical conditions lead to a request for euthanasia? A rapid scoping review
Rahimian, Z., Rahimian, L., López‐Castromán, J., Ostovarfar, J., Fallahi, M. J., Nayeri, M. A., & Vardanjani, H. M. (2024) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.1978 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Euthanasia, medically assisted dying or assisted suicide: time for psychiatrists to say no
Gale, C., & Barak, Y. (2020) · Australasian Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1039856219878645 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Perreault, A., Benrimoh, D., & Fielding, A. (2019) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101464 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationMedical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review
Favron-Godbout, C., & Racine, E. (2023) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-023-00971-4 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“A healthcare professional could share the patient’s demoralization [57] from lack of being able to relieve their suffering [28]: this transposition of the patient’s despair onto the healthcare professional would constitute transference.”
BackgroundInfluentialTrouble psychiatrique, souffrance réfractaire et aide active à mourir
Vachon, J., Mercy, P., Gasser, M., & Aubry, R. (2022) · Éthique & Santé · doi:10.1016/j.etiqe.2022.04.003 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Favron‐Godbout, C., & Racine, É. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24432000
- Authors
- Benrimoh, D., Perreault, A., & Van Den Eynde, F.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Benrimoh, David
- ORCID
- Benrimoh, David
- Venue
- International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 37-44
- ISSN
- 0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2765597701
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Keywords
- medical assistance in dying, euthanasia, psychiatric emergency department, decriminalization of euthanasia, eligibility criteria, end-of-life criteria, mental illness, suicide attempts, anorexia nervosa, elderly patients, Carter v. Canada, health care access
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Canada, Decision Making, Emergency Service, Hospital, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quebec, Comorbidity, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review