Cited by 8Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesHealth, Medicine and Society

Euthanasia requests in a Canadian psychiatric emergency room: A case series

Benrimoh, David, Perreault, Antoine, Van Den Eynde, Frederique·2017·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

Euthanasia was decriminalized in Quebec in December 2015, and Canada-wide in June 2016. Both the Provincial and Federal legislation have limited the right to medical assistance in dying (MAID) to end-of-life cases; which makes MAID inaccessible to most patients solely suffering from psychiatric illness. While some end-stage anorexia nervosa or elderly patients may meet the end-of-life criterion because of their medical comorbidities or their age (Kelly et al., 2003), repeated suicide attempts or psychotic disorganization would not qualify since they would not be seen as elements of an illness leading to a foreseeable "natural death" (Canada, 2016). This is in contradiction to other jurisdictions, such as Belgium and the Netherlands as well as the eligibility criteria stated in the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Carter v. Canada (Supreme Court of Canada, 2015). Here we analyze three cases of patients who presented to a psychiatric emergency department and requested MAID for psychiatric reasons. While none of the patients were eligible for MAID under Canadian law, we find that their demographics match closely that of patients granted MAID for psychiatric reasons in jurisdictions where that practice is allowed. Based on these cases, we comment on potentially negative consequences that may come from decriminalizing MAID for psychiatric reasons (such as an increased assessment burden on ED staff) and potentially positive consequences (such as encouraging suffering patients who had not consulted to seek care). While it is by no means our intention to take a political or moral stand on this important issue, or to conclusively weigh the negatives and positives of allowing MAID for psychiatric reasons, we do stress the importance of an active voice for psychiatry in this ongoing public debate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.10.006

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MAiD-MD can generate issues of transference and countertransference, particularly given the enduring relationship that some patients have with their healthcare professional.

    “MAiD-MD can generate issues of transference and countertransference, in particular given the enduring relationship that some patients have with their healthcare professional [2, 28, 53, 59, 60, 71, 76].”
  • In Canada, a series of psychiatric patients who applied for MAiD-NT were denied it although, based on their characteristics, they would have been eligible for MAiD-NT in other countries such as Belgium or the Netherlands.

    “A series of cases of patients with psychiatric disorders who applied for MAiD-NT were denied it, although, based on their characteristics, would have been eligible for MAiD-NT in other countries (e.g. Belgium, Netherlands) [67, 68].”
  • For some disorders, such as borderline personality disorders, a physician intervening by MAiD-NT could encounter moral distress because the criteria might not consider the common fluctuating suicidal ideation and behavior, contemporary psychosocial rehabilitation treatment, and the individual's potential for a life worth living.

    “For some disorders, such as borderline personality disorders, a physician intervening by MAiD-NT could encounter moral distress, since the criteria for the procedure might not take into consideration the common fluctuating suicidal ideation and behavior in these disorders, the contemporary forms of psychosocial rehabilitation treatment, and the individual’s potential for having a life worth living”
  • Adding a more rigorous assessment process for MAiD-MD requests, including various safeguards, could impose an additional burden on an already struggling healthcare system.

    “In this context, adding a more rigorous assessment process for MAiD-MD requests, including various safeguards, could impose an additional burden on an already struggling system [28, 45].”
  • MAiD-MD may seem irreconcilable with the valuing of recovery-oriented approaches in mental health care, and some fear that its introduction into the continuum of care will cause a paradigm shift from improving quality of life towards assessing eligibility for MAiD-MD.

    “MAiD-MD may seem irreconcilable with the valuing of recovery-oriented approaches in mental health care [65], and some fear that its introduction into the continuum of care will cause a paradigm shift from a goal of improving quality of life towards a goal of assessing eligibility for MAiD-MD [28].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benrimoh, D., Perreault, A., & Van Den Eynde, F.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Benrimoh, David
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
55
Pages
37-44
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765597701
Cited by
7
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
medical assistance in dying, euthanasia, psychiatric emergency department, decriminalization of euthanasia, eligibility criteria, end-of-life criteria, mental illness, suicide attempts, anorexia nervosa, elderly patients, Carter v. Canada, health care access
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Canada, Decision Making, Emergency Service, Hospital, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quebec, Comorbidity, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review